Disproportional Imprisonment of Black and Hispanic Males: Sentencing Discretion, Processing Outcomes, and Policy Structures

Jeffrey Todd Ulmer, Noah Painter-Davis, Leigh Tinik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Disproportional incarceration of black and Hispanic men has been the subject of much critical commentary and empirical inquiry. Such disproportionality may be due to greater involvement of minority men in serious crime, to discretionary decisions by local justice officials, or to the differential impact of sentencing policies, such as mandatory minimums or sentencing guidelines, that differentially impact minority men. This study investigated the extent to which the disproportional punishment of black and Hispanic men, and local variation in such disproportionality, can be attributed to unexplained disparities in local sentencing decisions, as opposed to the extent to which such differences are mediated by sentencing policies, or case-processing and extralegal factors. We use 2005–2009 federal court and Pennsylvania state court data. Our findings suggest, particularly in Federal courts, that most disproportionality is determined by processes prior to sentencing, especially sentencing policies that differentially impact minority males.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)642-681
Number of pages40
JournalJustice Quarterly
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 6 2016

Fingerprint

imprisonment
Hispanic Americans
minority
Punishment
Social Justice
Crime
penalty
justice
offense
Guidelines

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

@article{66e9b5fe9e5e4033a16ef7a533a1e1bd,
title = "Disproportional Imprisonment of Black and Hispanic Males: Sentencing Discretion, Processing Outcomes, and Policy Structures",
abstract = "Disproportional incarceration of black and Hispanic men has been the subject of much critical commentary and empirical inquiry. Such disproportionality may be due to greater involvement of minority men in serious crime, to discretionary decisions by local justice officials, or to the differential impact of sentencing policies, such as mandatory minimums or sentencing guidelines, that differentially impact minority men. This study investigated the extent to which the disproportional punishment of black and Hispanic men, and local variation in such disproportionality, can be attributed to unexplained disparities in local sentencing decisions, as opposed to the extent to which such differences are mediated by sentencing policies, or case-processing and extralegal factors. We use 2005–2009 federal court and Pennsylvania state court data. Our findings suggest, particularly in Federal courts, that most disproportionality is determined by processes prior to sentencing, especially sentencing policies that differentially impact minority males.",
author = "Ulmer, {Jeffrey Todd} and Noah Painter-Davis and Leigh Tinik",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1080/07418825.2014.958186",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "642--681",
journal = "Justice Quarterly",
issn = "0741-8825",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

Disproportional Imprisonment of Black and Hispanic Males : Sentencing Discretion, Processing Outcomes, and Policy Structures. / Ulmer, Jeffrey Todd; Painter-Davis, Noah; Tinik, Leigh.

In: Justice Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 4, 06.06.2016, p. 642-681.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disproportional Imprisonment of Black and Hispanic Males

T2 - Sentencing Discretion, Processing Outcomes, and Policy Structures

AU - Ulmer, Jeffrey Todd

AU - Painter-Davis, Noah

AU - Tinik, Leigh

PY - 2016/6/6

Y1 - 2016/6/6

N2 - Disproportional incarceration of black and Hispanic men has been the subject of much critical commentary and empirical inquiry. Such disproportionality may be due to greater involvement of minority men in serious crime, to discretionary decisions by local justice officials, or to the differential impact of sentencing policies, such as mandatory minimums or sentencing guidelines, that differentially impact minority men. This study investigated the extent to which the disproportional punishment of black and Hispanic men, and local variation in such disproportionality, can be attributed to unexplained disparities in local sentencing decisions, as opposed to the extent to which such differences are mediated by sentencing policies, or case-processing and extralegal factors. We use 2005–2009 federal court and Pennsylvania state court data. Our findings suggest, particularly in Federal courts, that most disproportionality is determined by processes prior to sentencing, especially sentencing policies that differentially impact minority males.

AB - Disproportional incarceration of black and Hispanic men has been the subject of much critical commentary and empirical inquiry. Such disproportionality may be due to greater involvement of minority men in serious crime, to discretionary decisions by local justice officials, or to the differential impact of sentencing policies, such as mandatory minimums or sentencing guidelines, that differentially impact minority men. This study investigated the extent to which the disproportional punishment of black and Hispanic men, and local variation in such disproportionality, can be attributed to unexplained disparities in local sentencing decisions, as opposed to the extent to which such differences are mediated by sentencing policies, or case-processing and extralegal factors. We use 2005–2009 federal court and Pennsylvania state court data. Our findings suggest, particularly in Federal courts, that most disproportionality is determined by processes prior to sentencing, especially sentencing policies that differentially impact minority males.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962349396&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962349396&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07418825.2014.958186

DO - 10.1080/07418825.2014.958186

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84962349396

VL - 33

SP - 642

EP - 681

JO - Justice Quarterly

JF - Justice Quarterly

SN - 0741-8825

IS - 4

ER -