Dissociable mappings of tonic and phasic pupillary features onto cognitive processes involved in mental arithmetic

Russell A.Cohen Hoffing, Nina Lauharatanahirun, Daniel E. Forster, Javier O. Garcia, Jean M. Vettel, Steven M. Thurman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Pupil size modulations have been used for decades as a window into the mind, and several pupillary features have been implicated in a variety of cognitive processes. Thus, a general challenge facing the field of pupillometry has been understanding which pupil features should be most relevant for explaining behavior in a given task domain. In the present study, a longitudinal design was employed where participants completed 8 biweekly sessions of a classic mental arithmetic task for the purposes of teasing apart the relationships between tonic/phasic pupil features (baseline, peak amplitude, peak latency) and two task-related cognitive processes including mental processing load (indexed by math question difficulty) and decision making (indexed by response times). We used multi-level modeling to account for individual variation while identifying pupil-to-behavior relationships at the single-trial and between-session levels. We show a dissociation between phasic and tonic features with peak amplitude and latency (but not baseline) driven by ongoing task-related processing, whereas baseline was driven by state-level effects that changed over a longer time period (i.e. weeks). Finally, we report a dissociation between peak amplitude and latency whereby amplitude reflected surprise and processing load, and latency reflected decision making times.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere0230517
JournalPloS one
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • General

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Dissociable mappings of tonic and phasic pupillary features onto cognitive processes involved in mental arithmetic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this