Divergent paths, divergent outcomes

Linking differences in economic reform to levels of US foreign direct investment and business in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article compares two transition economies that have diverged in their progress on important economic reform areas and then seeks to link these differences to their resulting levels of investment and business. For this study, interviews were conducted with firm representatives that had invested or conducted business in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan in order to determine the areas of reform that were the most important for their investment and business decisions. The analysis indicates a relationship between Kazakhstan's advanced economic reforms in such areas as foreign investment legislation, tax legislation, banking system reform, and higher levels of investment and business. Uzbekistan's lack of progress in these reform areas has affected the level of investment in the country, but not the number of firms conducting business. This was primarily because firms could secure financing for the business through the US Export-Import Bank.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages355-372
Number of pages18
Volume26
No3
Specialist publicationCentral Asian Survey
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2007

Fingerprint

Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
foreign direct investment
economic reform
direct investment
foreign investment
firm
reform
tax legislation
legislation
banking
import
bank
economy
lack
interview

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Development
  • Earth-Surface Processes

Cite this

@misc{3b7e562aaaf2463fb7c3ade23af27151,
title = "Divergent paths, divergent outcomes: Linking differences in economic reform to levels of US foreign direct investment and business in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan",
abstract = "This article compares two transition economies that have diverged in their progress on important economic reform areas and then seeks to link these differences to their resulting levels of investment and business. For this study, interviews were conducted with firm representatives that had invested or conducted business in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan in order to determine the areas of reform that were the most important for their investment and business decisions. The analysis indicates a relationship between Kazakhstan's advanced economic reforms in such areas as foreign investment legislation, tax legislation, banking system reform, and higher levels of investment and business. Uzbekistan's lack of progress in these reform areas has affected the level of investment in the country, but not the number of firms conducting business. This was primarily because firms could secure financing for the business through the US Export-Import Bank.",
author = "Blackmon, {Pamela Elizabeth}",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/02634930701702563",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "355--372",
journal = "Central Asian Survey",
issn = "0263-4937",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Divergent paths, divergent outcomes

T2 - Linking differences in economic reform to levels of US foreign direct investment and business in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan

AU - Blackmon, Pamela Elizabeth

PY - 2007/9/1

Y1 - 2007/9/1

N2 - This article compares two transition economies that have diverged in their progress on important economic reform areas and then seeks to link these differences to their resulting levels of investment and business. For this study, interviews were conducted with firm representatives that had invested or conducted business in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan in order to determine the areas of reform that were the most important for their investment and business decisions. The analysis indicates a relationship between Kazakhstan's advanced economic reforms in such areas as foreign investment legislation, tax legislation, banking system reform, and higher levels of investment and business. Uzbekistan's lack of progress in these reform areas has affected the level of investment in the country, but not the number of firms conducting business. This was primarily because firms could secure financing for the business through the US Export-Import Bank.

AB - This article compares two transition economies that have diverged in their progress on important economic reform areas and then seeks to link these differences to their resulting levels of investment and business. For this study, interviews were conducted with firm representatives that had invested or conducted business in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan in order to determine the areas of reform that were the most important for their investment and business decisions. The analysis indicates a relationship between Kazakhstan's advanced economic reforms in such areas as foreign investment legislation, tax legislation, banking system reform, and higher levels of investment and business. Uzbekistan's lack of progress in these reform areas has affected the level of investment in the country, but not the number of firms conducting business. This was primarily because firms could secure financing for the business through the US Export-Import Bank.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37549043580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37549043580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02634930701702563

DO - 10.1080/02634930701702563

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 355

EP - 372

JO - Central Asian Survey

JF - Central Asian Survey

SN - 0263-4937

ER -