Do actions reported by physicians in training conflict with consensus guidelines on ethics?

Michael J. Green, Gary Mitchell, Carol B. Stocking, Christine K. Cassel, Mark Siegler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To assess the extent to which actions reported by internal medicine trainees conflict with published guidelines on ethics. Methods: A confidential survey was sent to a random sample (N= 1000) of associate members of the American College of Physicians (ACP). Questions were asked about ethical decision making in areas addressed by the guidelines in the ACP Ethics Manual. Quoted manual guidelines were provided, followed by 55 yes or no questions, such that a yes answer represented an action that conflicted with a guideline. There were two follow up mailings to nonresponders. Results: Forty percent (n=397) completed the questionnaire; 17% indicated they were aware of the guidelines on ethics. On average, associates responded yes to 16% of questions where a yes response indicated they have acted outside guidelines on ethics one or more times. The mean number of responses (n=55) that conflicted with a guideline was 76 per person (SD, 4.7 responses; range, 0 to 33 responses). Ninety-eight percent of respondents reported actions falling outside a guideline one or more times and 80% did so four or more times. The most frequently reported reason (965/3219 [30%]) from a list of four choices for acting outside a guideline was 'I was aware of the guideline, but this did not represent an ethical dilemma to me.' Conclusions: Few responding ACP associates indicated awareness of the ACP guidelines on ethic. Physicians in training nevertheless reported acting according to the presented guidelines most of the time, although nearly all respondents acted outside a guideline at least once, and some did so many times. Reported behaviors were sometimes inconsistent with consensus ethical standards that apply to internists. Physicians in training need to know more about ethical standards that apply to their own practice and should be aware when their actions deviate from ethical norms. Before acting outside guidelines on ethics, trainees should discuss their conflicts with others, such as attending physicians, clinical ethicists, or hospital ethics committees.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)298-304
Number of pages7
JournalArchives of Internal Medicine
Volume156
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 12 1996

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Internal Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Do actions reported by physicians in training conflict with consensus guidelines on ethics?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this