Do different methods for modeling age-graded trajectories yield consistent and valid results?

John Robert Warren, Liying Luo, Andrew Halpern-Manners, James M. Raymo, Alberto Palloni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Data on age-sequenced trajectories of individuals’ attributes are used for a growing number of research purposes. However, there is no consensus about which method to use to identify the number of discrete trajectories in a population or to assign individuals to a specific trajectory group. The authors modeled real and simulated trajectory data using “naïve” methods, optimal matching, grade of membership models, and three types of finite-mixture models. They found that these methods produced inferences about the number of trajectories that frequently differ (1) fromone another and (2) fromthe truth as represented by simulation parameters. They also found that they differed in the assignment of individuals to trajectory groups. In light of these findings, the authors argue that researchers should interpret results based on these methods cautiously, neither reifying point estimates about the number of trajectories nor treating individuals’ trajectory group assignments as certain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalAmerican Journal of Sociology
Volume120
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 14 2015

Fingerprint

Group
simulation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Warren, John Robert ; Luo, Liying ; Halpern-Manners, Andrew ; Raymo, James M. ; Palloni, Alberto. / Do different methods for modeling age-graded trajectories yield consistent and valid results?. In: American Journal of Sociology. 2015 ; Vol. 120, No. 6.
@article{f60c507d73814f7d96335f10e1a431f8,
title = "Do different methods for modeling age-graded trajectories yield consistent and valid results?",
abstract = "Data on age-sequenced trajectories of individuals’ attributes are used for a growing number of research purposes. However, there is no consensus about which method to use to identify the number of discrete trajectories in a population or to assign individuals to a specific trajectory group. The authors modeled real and simulated trajectory data using “na{\"i}ve” methods, optimal matching, grade of membership models, and three types of finite-mixture models. They found that these methods produced inferences about the number of trajectories that frequently differ (1) fromone another and (2) fromthe truth as represented by simulation parameters. They also found that they differed in the assignment of individuals to trajectory groups. In light of these findings, the authors argue that researchers should interpret results based on these methods cautiously, neither reifying point estimates about the number of trajectories nor treating individuals’ trajectory group assignments as certain.",
author = "Warren, {John Robert} and Liying Luo and Andrew Halpern-Manners and Raymo, {James M.} and Alberto Palloni",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1086/681962",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "120",
journal = "American Journal of Sociology",
issn = "0002-9602",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "6",

}

Do different methods for modeling age-graded trajectories yield consistent and valid results? / Warren, John Robert; Luo, Liying; Halpern-Manners, Andrew; Raymo, James M.; Palloni, Alberto.

In: American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 120, No. 6, 14.07.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do different methods for modeling age-graded trajectories yield consistent and valid results?

AU - Warren, John Robert

AU - Luo, Liying

AU - Halpern-Manners, Andrew

AU - Raymo, James M.

AU - Palloni, Alberto

PY - 2015/7/14

Y1 - 2015/7/14

N2 - Data on age-sequenced trajectories of individuals’ attributes are used for a growing number of research purposes. However, there is no consensus about which method to use to identify the number of discrete trajectories in a population or to assign individuals to a specific trajectory group. The authors modeled real and simulated trajectory data using “naïve” methods, optimal matching, grade of membership models, and three types of finite-mixture models. They found that these methods produced inferences about the number of trajectories that frequently differ (1) fromone another and (2) fromthe truth as represented by simulation parameters. They also found that they differed in the assignment of individuals to trajectory groups. In light of these findings, the authors argue that researchers should interpret results based on these methods cautiously, neither reifying point estimates about the number of trajectories nor treating individuals’ trajectory group assignments as certain.

AB - Data on age-sequenced trajectories of individuals’ attributes are used for a growing number of research purposes. However, there is no consensus about which method to use to identify the number of discrete trajectories in a population or to assign individuals to a specific trajectory group. The authors modeled real and simulated trajectory data using “naïve” methods, optimal matching, grade of membership models, and three types of finite-mixture models. They found that these methods produced inferences about the number of trajectories that frequently differ (1) fromone another and (2) fromthe truth as represented by simulation parameters. They also found that they differed in the assignment of individuals to trajectory groups. In light of these findings, the authors argue that researchers should interpret results based on these methods cautiously, neither reifying point estimates about the number of trajectories nor treating individuals’ trajectory group assignments as certain.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84936993308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84936993308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/681962

DO - 10.1086/681962

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84936993308

VL - 120

JO - American Journal of Sociology

JF - American Journal of Sociology

SN - 0002-9602

IS - 6

ER -