Do health care professionals find the use of age-based rationing to reduce health care costs ethical?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose – As a result of the aging of American society, health care costs have been and will continue to rise, to the extent that they are not sustainable. Obviously, this trend will continue in spite of the 2010 health care reform. As a result of this uncontrollable problem, writers such as Daniel Callahan have proposed age-based rationing of health care while utilizing the utilitarian notions of ethics and justice. However, other writers, utilizing more egalitarian notions of justice, have opposed this. This suggests an ethical dilemma, which has to be debated in the future. The author believes professors teaching health care related courses will be instrumental in this debate, explaining why she decided to seek the opinion of a sample of 18 professors regarding this issue. The purpose of this paper is to report on the results of this research. Design/methodology/approach – Qualitative methodology, specially grounded theory, was used in this study that sought to explore the views of 18 full-time professors who teach health care policy and administration in Northeast Pennsylvania about age-based rationing of health care. Qualitative research is very useful uncovering the views of individuals as they relate to their experiences. In the study, professors were asked 14 questions by the author, four of these being demographic. The remaining ten questions, open ended ones, sought the opinions of these professors about their support or opposition to age-based rationing. Findings – The author's interviews of those 18 professors and the analysis of the responses, which revealed the complexity and multidimensional nature of the issue, led to the emergence of eight different themes. Originality/value – The author used a qualitative method of research, interviewing 18 professors, to uncover personal views not previously published.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)282-299
Number of pages18
JournalHumanomics
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2011

Fingerprint

Rationing
Costs
Healthcare
Health care costs
Justice
Writer
Teaching
Ethical dilemmas
Qualitative methods
Health care policy
Design methodology
Demographics
Qualitative methodology
Qualitative research
Interviewing
Grounded theory
Health care reform
Qualitative Research
Methodology
Northeast

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

@article{c2699f34cdcd48a4b4e53c3aafca20a9,
title = "Do health care professionals find the use of age-based rationing to reduce health care costs ethical?",
abstract = "Purpose – As a result of the aging of American society, health care costs have been and will continue to rise, to the extent that they are not sustainable. Obviously, this trend will continue in spite of the 2010 health care reform. As a result of this uncontrollable problem, writers such as Daniel Callahan have proposed age-based rationing of health care while utilizing the utilitarian notions of ethics and justice. However, other writers, utilizing more egalitarian notions of justice, have opposed this. This suggests an ethical dilemma, which has to be debated in the future. The author believes professors teaching health care related courses will be instrumental in this debate, explaining why she decided to seek the opinion of a sample of 18 professors regarding this issue. The purpose of this paper is to report on the results of this research. Design/methodology/approach – Qualitative methodology, specially grounded theory, was used in this study that sought to explore the views of 18 full-time professors who teach health care policy and administration in Northeast Pennsylvania about age-based rationing of health care. Qualitative research is very useful uncovering the views of individuals as they relate to their experiences. In the study, professors were asked 14 questions by the author, four of these being demographic. The remaining ten questions, open ended ones, sought the opinions of these professors about their support or opposition to age-based rationing. Findings – The author's interviews of those 18 professors and the analysis of the responses, which revealed the complexity and multidimensional nature of the issue, led to the emergence of eight different themes. Originality/value – The author used a qualitative method of research, interviewing 18 professors, to uncover personal views not previously published.",
author = "Hengameh Hosseini",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/08288661111181323",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "282--299",
journal = "International Journal of Ethics and Systems",
issn = "2514-9369",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

Do health care professionals find the use of age-based rationing to reduce health care costs ethical? / Hosseini, Hengameh.

In: Humanomics, Vol. 27, No. 4, 01.11.2011, p. 282-299.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do health care professionals find the use of age-based rationing to reduce health care costs ethical?

AU - Hosseini, Hengameh

PY - 2011/11/1

Y1 - 2011/11/1

N2 - Purpose – As a result of the aging of American society, health care costs have been and will continue to rise, to the extent that they are not sustainable. Obviously, this trend will continue in spite of the 2010 health care reform. As a result of this uncontrollable problem, writers such as Daniel Callahan have proposed age-based rationing of health care while utilizing the utilitarian notions of ethics and justice. However, other writers, utilizing more egalitarian notions of justice, have opposed this. This suggests an ethical dilemma, which has to be debated in the future. The author believes professors teaching health care related courses will be instrumental in this debate, explaining why she decided to seek the opinion of a sample of 18 professors regarding this issue. The purpose of this paper is to report on the results of this research. Design/methodology/approach – Qualitative methodology, specially grounded theory, was used in this study that sought to explore the views of 18 full-time professors who teach health care policy and administration in Northeast Pennsylvania about age-based rationing of health care. Qualitative research is very useful uncovering the views of individuals as they relate to their experiences. In the study, professors were asked 14 questions by the author, four of these being demographic. The remaining ten questions, open ended ones, sought the opinions of these professors about their support or opposition to age-based rationing. Findings – The author's interviews of those 18 professors and the analysis of the responses, which revealed the complexity and multidimensional nature of the issue, led to the emergence of eight different themes. Originality/value – The author used a qualitative method of research, interviewing 18 professors, to uncover personal views not previously published.

AB - Purpose – As a result of the aging of American society, health care costs have been and will continue to rise, to the extent that they are not sustainable. Obviously, this trend will continue in spite of the 2010 health care reform. As a result of this uncontrollable problem, writers such as Daniel Callahan have proposed age-based rationing of health care while utilizing the utilitarian notions of ethics and justice. However, other writers, utilizing more egalitarian notions of justice, have opposed this. This suggests an ethical dilemma, which has to be debated in the future. The author believes professors teaching health care related courses will be instrumental in this debate, explaining why she decided to seek the opinion of a sample of 18 professors regarding this issue. The purpose of this paper is to report on the results of this research. Design/methodology/approach – Qualitative methodology, specially grounded theory, was used in this study that sought to explore the views of 18 full-time professors who teach health care policy and administration in Northeast Pennsylvania about age-based rationing of health care. Qualitative research is very useful uncovering the views of individuals as they relate to their experiences. In the study, professors were asked 14 questions by the author, four of these being demographic. The remaining ten questions, open ended ones, sought the opinions of these professors about their support or opposition to age-based rationing. Findings – The author's interviews of those 18 professors and the analysis of the responses, which revealed the complexity and multidimensional nature of the issue, led to the emergence of eight different themes. Originality/value – The author used a qualitative method of research, interviewing 18 professors, to uncover personal views not previously published.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986132065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84986132065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/08288661111181323

DO - 10.1108/08288661111181323

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84986132065

VL - 27

SP - 282

EP - 299

JO - International Journal of Ethics and Systems

JF - International Journal of Ethics and Systems

SN - 2514-9369

IS - 4

ER -