Do international rules and norms apply to nonstate actors?

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

The nonstate actors of interest in this article are territorial contenders: political entities that control populated territory, function like sovereign states but are not recognized as sovereign states by other members of the international system. Sometimes they are de facto states, sometimes they are rebel groups, sometimes they are neither of these, instead existing in control of territory with neither conflict against the sovereign state within whose borders they exist nor claims to a state of their own. New data about territorial contenders permit me to evaluate arguments about changing rules and norms in the international system. I find support for claims about the consequences of changing rules about which actors are recognized as sovereign states but not for claims about a norm against conquest after World War II. In the discussion section, I consider implications of these findings for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)210-224
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Studies Review
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

international system
World War II
Group
norm
conflict
border
world

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{22afbdf0e5fc4d71bea255254849d1b3,
title = "Do international rules and norms apply to nonstate actors?",
abstract = "The nonstate actors of interest in this article are territorial contenders: political entities that control populated territory, function like sovereign states but are not recognized as sovereign states by other members of the international system. Sometimes they are de facto states, sometimes they are rebel groups, sometimes they are neither of these, instead existing in control of territory with neither conflict against the sovereign state within whose borders they exist nor claims to a state of their own. New data about territorial contenders permit me to evaluate arguments about changing rules and norms in the international system. I find support for claims about the consequences of changing rules about which actors are recognized as sovereign states but not for claims about a norm against conquest after World War II. In the discussion section, I consider implications of these findings for future research.",
author = "Lemke, {Douglas William}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/isr/viz015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "210--224",
journal = "International Studies Review",
issn = "1521-9488",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Do international rules and norms apply to nonstate actors? / Lemke, Douglas William.

In: International Studies Review, Vol. 21, No. 2, 01.01.2019, p. 210-224.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do international rules and norms apply to nonstate actors?

AU - Lemke, Douglas William

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The nonstate actors of interest in this article are territorial contenders: political entities that control populated territory, function like sovereign states but are not recognized as sovereign states by other members of the international system. Sometimes they are de facto states, sometimes they are rebel groups, sometimes they are neither of these, instead existing in control of territory with neither conflict against the sovereign state within whose borders they exist nor claims to a state of their own. New data about territorial contenders permit me to evaluate arguments about changing rules and norms in the international system. I find support for claims about the consequences of changing rules about which actors are recognized as sovereign states but not for claims about a norm against conquest after World War II. In the discussion section, I consider implications of these findings for future research.

AB - The nonstate actors of interest in this article are territorial contenders: political entities that control populated territory, function like sovereign states but are not recognized as sovereign states by other members of the international system. Sometimes they are de facto states, sometimes they are rebel groups, sometimes they are neither of these, instead existing in control of territory with neither conflict against the sovereign state within whose borders they exist nor claims to a state of their own. New data about territorial contenders permit me to evaluate arguments about changing rules and norms in the international system. I find support for claims about the consequences of changing rules about which actors are recognized as sovereign states but not for claims about a norm against conquest after World War II. In the discussion section, I consider implications of these findings for future research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072379330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072379330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/isr/viz015

DO - 10.1093/isr/viz015

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85072379330

VL - 21

SP - 210

EP - 224

JO - International Studies Review

JF - International Studies Review

SN - 1521-9488

IS - 2

ER -