Do risk factors matter in the IPO valuation?

Khaled Khalil Abdou, Mehmet F. Dicle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose-The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether all of the risk factors were priced during the internet bubble period. Design/methodology/approach-A unique hand collected dataset was used from public prospectuses for companies that issued an initial public offering during the internet bubble period. Three hypotheses were proposed: the risk factors mentioned in the prospectus are important for IPO trading and therefore affect IPO underpricing; risk factors affect the IPO deal attributes; and the number of risk factors cited by the issuing firm is affected by direct participants such as venture capitalists and investment bankers. Findings-It was found that hi-tech dummy played a significant role during the bubble period. Moreover, not all risk factors are regarded important, some of them are not significant at all as predicted by first hypothesis. The most striking observation is the negative economic significance of the risk factor no prior market for the traded stock. This reveals that, traders are selective in valuing risks and may value some factors as opportunities and not as risk factors. In addition, the results reveal that risk factors do affect the deal attributes as predicted by our second hypothesis. Also, the pricing of these risk factors are not different between retail and hi-tech companies. Regarding the participants, it was found that venture capitalists and investment bankers have a significant statistical and economic effect on the number of risk factors reported in the prospectus. Originality/value-The paper contributes to the literature by investigating the IPO underpricing phenomenon in the internet bubble period.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)63-89
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Financial Regulation and Compliance
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

Fingerprint

Risk factors
Bubble
World Wide Web
Bankers
IPO underpricing
Venture capitalists
Initial public offerings
Pricing
Traders
Design methodology
Economic effect
Factors
Economic significance
Retail

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Finance
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

@article{5058e58c322b4f7f9928f9e9f59643b9,
title = "Do risk factors matter in the IPO valuation?",
abstract = "Purpose-The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether all of the risk factors were priced during the internet bubble period. Design/methodology/approach-A unique hand collected dataset was used from public prospectuses for companies that issued an initial public offering during the internet bubble period. Three hypotheses were proposed: the risk factors mentioned in the prospectus are important for IPO trading and therefore affect IPO underpricing; risk factors affect the IPO deal attributes; and the number of risk factors cited by the issuing firm is affected by direct participants such as venture capitalists and investment bankers. Findings-It was found that hi-tech dummy played a significant role during the bubble period. Moreover, not all risk factors are regarded important, some of them are not significant at all as predicted by first hypothesis. The most striking observation is the negative economic significance of the risk factor no prior market for the traded stock. This reveals that, traders are selective in valuing risks and may value some factors as opportunities and not as risk factors. In addition, the results reveal that risk factors do affect the deal attributes as predicted by our second hypothesis. Also, the pricing of these risk factors are not different between retail and hi-tech companies. Regarding the participants, it was found that venture capitalists and investment bankers have a significant statistical and economic effect on the number of risk factors reported in the prospectus. Originality/value-The paper contributes to the literature by investigating the IPO underpricing phenomenon in the internet bubble period.",
author = "Abdou, {Khaled Khalil} and Dicle, {Mehmet F.}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/13581980710726796",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "63--89",
journal = "Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance",
issn = "1358-1988",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Do risk factors matter in the IPO valuation? / Abdou, Khaled Khalil; Dicle, Mehmet F.

In: Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.01.2007, p. 63-89.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do risk factors matter in the IPO valuation?

AU - Abdou, Khaled Khalil

AU - Dicle, Mehmet F.

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - Purpose-The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether all of the risk factors were priced during the internet bubble period. Design/methodology/approach-A unique hand collected dataset was used from public prospectuses for companies that issued an initial public offering during the internet bubble period. Three hypotheses were proposed: the risk factors mentioned in the prospectus are important for IPO trading and therefore affect IPO underpricing; risk factors affect the IPO deal attributes; and the number of risk factors cited by the issuing firm is affected by direct participants such as venture capitalists and investment bankers. Findings-It was found that hi-tech dummy played a significant role during the bubble period. Moreover, not all risk factors are regarded important, some of them are not significant at all as predicted by first hypothesis. The most striking observation is the negative economic significance of the risk factor no prior market for the traded stock. This reveals that, traders are selective in valuing risks and may value some factors as opportunities and not as risk factors. In addition, the results reveal that risk factors do affect the deal attributes as predicted by our second hypothesis. Also, the pricing of these risk factors are not different between retail and hi-tech companies. Regarding the participants, it was found that venture capitalists and investment bankers have a significant statistical and economic effect on the number of risk factors reported in the prospectus. Originality/value-The paper contributes to the literature by investigating the IPO underpricing phenomenon in the internet bubble period.

AB - Purpose-The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether all of the risk factors were priced during the internet bubble period. Design/methodology/approach-A unique hand collected dataset was used from public prospectuses for companies that issued an initial public offering during the internet bubble period. Three hypotheses were proposed: the risk factors mentioned in the prospectus are important for IPO trading and therefore affect IPO underpricing; risk factors affect the IPO deal attributes; and the number of risk factors cited by the issuing firm is affected by direct participants such as venture capitalists and investment bankers. Findings-It was found that hi-tech dummy played a significant role during the bubble period. Moreover, not all risk factors are regarded important, some of them are not significant at all as predicted by first hypothesis. The most striking observation is the negative economic significance of the risk factor no prior market for the traded stock. This reveals that, traders are selective in valuing risks and may value some factors as opportunities and not as risk factors. In addition, the results reveal that risk factors do affect the deal attributes as predicted by our second hypothesis. Also, the pricing of these risk factors are not different between retail and hi-tech companies. Regarding the participants, it was found that venture capitalists and investment bankers have a significant statistical and economic effect on the number of risk factors reported in the prospectus. Originality/value-The paper contributes to the literature by investigating the IPO underpricing phenomenon in the internet bubble period.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855566300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855566300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/13581980710726796

DO - 10.1108/13581980710726796

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 63

EP - 89

JO - Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance

JF - Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance

SN - 1358-1988

IS - 1

ER -