Does clinician continuity over two brief motivational sessions improve outcomes in college students?

Erica Eaton Short, Anne Fernandez, Brian Borsari, John T.P. Hustad, Mark Wood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous research has shown that brief motivational interventions (BMIs) are an effective treatment approach for reducing college student alcohol use and associated negative consequences. The purpose of this study was to determine whether clinician continuity (having the same vs. a different clinician) across an initial BMI and follow-up booster session was related to differences in session satisfaction, self-reported alcohol use, and alcohol-related negative consequences. Participants included 358 undergraduate students who were part of a larger randomized clinical trial. Results revealed no significant differences in alcohol use and associated consequences at follow-up between participants who met with the same versus a different clinician. Clinician continuity was not significantly related to intervention fidelity in terms of BMI-consistent qualities, relevance of information presented, or session satisfaction. These findings suggest that clinician continuity across BMIs for college students is not related to participant satisfaction or intervention effectiveness, especially if the clinicians adhere to empirically supported techniques.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)313-320
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Volume41
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2011

Fingerprint

Alcohols
Students
Randomized Controlled Trials
Research
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Phychiatric Mental Health
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Short, Erica Eaton ; Fernandez, Anne ; Borsari, Brian ; Hustad, John T.P. ; Wood, Mark. / Does clinician continuity over two brief motivational sessions improve outcomes in college students?. In: Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2011 ; Vol. 41, No. 3. pp. 313-320.
@article{fce751d3aed94d369dbd5f01cfa80444,
title = "Does clinician continuity over two brief motivational sessions improve outcomes in college students?",
abstract = "Previous research has shown that brief motivational interventions (BMIs) are an effective treatment approach for reducing college student alcohol use and associated negative consequences. The purpose of this study was to determine whether clinician continuity (having the same vs. a different clinician) across an initial BMI and follow-up booster session was related to differences in session satisfaction, self-reported alcohol use, and alcohol-related negative consequences. Participants included 358 undergraduate students who were part of a larger randomized clinical trial. Results revealed no significant differences in alcohol use and associated consequences at follow-up between participants who met with the same versus a different clinician. Clinician continuity was not significantly related to intervention fidelity in terms of BMI-consistent qualities, relevance of information presented, or session satisfaction. These findings suggest that clinician continuity across BMIs for college students is not related to participant satisfaction or intervention effectiveness, especially if the clinicians adhere to empirically supported techniques.",
author = "Short, {Erica Eaton} and Anne Fernandez and Brian Borsari and Hustad, {John T.P.} and Mark Wood",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsat.2011.04.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "313--320",
journal = "Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment",
issn = "0740-5472",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Does clinician continuity over two brief motivational sessions improve outcomes in college students? / Short, Erica Eaton; Fernandez, Anne; Borsari, Brian; Hustad, John T.P.; Wood, Mark.

In: Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, Vol. 41, No. 3, 01.10.2011, p. 313-320.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does clinician continuity over two brief motivational sessions improve outcomes in college students?

AU - Short, Erica Eaton

AU - Fernandez, Anne

AU - Borsari, Brian

AU - Hustad, John T.P.

AU - Wood, Mark

PY - 2011/10/1

Y1 - 2011/10/1

N2 - Previous research has shown that brief motivational interventions (BMIs) are an effective treatment approach for reducing college student alcohol use and associated negative consequences. The purpose of this study was to determine whether clinician continuity (having the same vs. a different clinician) across an initial BMI and follow-up booster session was related to differences in session satisfaction, self-reported alcohol use, and alcohol-related negative consequences. Participants included 358 undergraduate students who were part of a larger randomized clinical trial. Results revealed no significant differences in alcohol use and associated consequences at follow-up between participants who met with the same versus a different clinician. Clinician continuity was not significantly related to intervention fidelity in terms of BMI-consistent qualities, relevance of information presented, or session satisfaction. These findings suggest that clinician continuity across BMIs for college students is not related to participant satisfaction or intervention effectiveness, especially if the clinicians adhere to empirically supported techniques.

AB - Previous research has shown that brief motivational interventions (BMIs) are an effective treatment approach for reducing college student alcohol use and associated negative consequences. The purpose of this study was to determine whether clinician continuity (having the same vs. a different clinician) across an initial BMI and follow-up booster session was related to differences in session satisfaction, self-reported alcohol use, and alcohol-related negative consequences. Participants included 358 undergraduate students who were part of a larger randomized clinical trial. Results revealed no significant differences in alcohol use and associated consequences at follow-up between participants who met with the same versus a different clinician. Clinician continuity was not significantly related to intervention fidelity in terms of BMI-consistent qualities, relevance of information presented, or session satisfaction. These findings suggest that clinician continuity across BMIs for college students is not related to participant satisfaction or intervention effectiveness, especially if the clinicians adhere to empirically supported techniques.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052329816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052329816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsat.2011.04.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jsat.2011.04.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 21696911

AN - SCOPUS:80052329816

VL - 41

SP - 313

EP - 320

JO - Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

JF - Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

SN - 0740-5472

IS - 3

ER -