Does competition for transplantable hearts encourage 'gaming' of the waiting list?

Dennis P. Scanlon, Christopher S. Hollenbeak, Woolton Lee, Evan Loh, Peter A. Ubel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Transplant centers may "game" the severity of listed patients to increase their patients' likelihood of receiving transplantable organs. Recent lawsuits allege gaming at some centers, and listing policies were modified in 1999 to clarify listing criteria. We tested for gaming and its relationship to heart transplant center competition. We found that increased competition resulted in more patients listed in the most severe illness category (p < .01), consistent with the gaming hypothesis. Gaming was mitigated after the 1999 policy change (p > .05), which suggests that the new rules were effective. Continued monitoring is warranted, given prior gaming and recent accusations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)191-198
Number of pages8
JournalHealth Affairs
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Does competition for transplantable hearts encourage 'gaming' of the waiting list?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this