Does cost-share replicate water quality trading projects? Implications for a possible partnership

Hanna L. Breetz, Karen Ann Fisher-Vanden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Water Quality Trading (WQT) and federal conservation programs such as the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) employ incentive payments to encourage agricultural best management practices (BMPs). In many cases, WQT and EQIP are encouraging the same types of farmers to implement the same types of BMPs using similar incentive payments. A number of analysts have recommended that WQT partner with EQIP to recruit farmers, yet the literature lacks an analysis of whether EQIP could adequately substitute for WQT's project selection process. In this article, we systematically compare the project ranking procedures used by WQT and EQIP and suggest which partnership structures might be most appropriate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)201-215
Number of pages15
JournalReview of Agricultural Economics
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2007

Fingerprint

Environmental Quality Incentives Program
incentive
environmental quality
water quality
water
costs
cost
best management practice
farmers
good agricultural practices
best management practices
farmer
conservation programs
project
Costs
Incentives
Water quality
management
ranking
programme

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

@article{03aa3dac60364b7a9f7f9d368feb4518,
title = "Does cost-share replicate water quality trading projects? Implications for a possible partnership",
abstract = "Water Quality Trading (WQT) and federal conservation programs such as the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) employ incentive payments to encourage agricultural best management practices (BMPs). In many cases, WQT and EQIP are encouraging the same types of farmers to implement the same types of BMPs using similar incentive payments. A number of analysts have recommended that WQT partner with EQIP to recruit farmers, yet the literature lacks an analysis of whether EQIP could adequately substitute for WQT's project selection process. In this article, we systematically compare the project ranking procedures used by WQT and EQIP and suggest which partnership structures might be most appropriate.",
author = "Breetz, {Hanna L.} and Fisher-Vanden, {Karen Ann}",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9353.2007.00338.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "201--215",
journal = "Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy",
issn = "2040-5790",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

Does cost-share replicate water quality trading projects? Implications for a possible partnership. / Breetz, Hanna L.; Fisher-Vanden, Karen Ann.

In: Review of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 29, No. 2, 01.06.2007, p. 201-215.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does cost-share replicate water quality trading projects? Implications for a possible partnership

AU - Breetz, Hanna L.

AU - Fisher-Vanden, Karen Ann

PY - 2007/6/1

Y1 - 2007/6/1

N2 - Water Quality Trading (WQT) and federal conservation programs such as the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) employ incentive payments to encourage agricultural best management practices (BMPs). In many cases, WQT and EQIP are encouraging the same types of farmers to implement the same types of BMPs using similar incentive payments. A number of analysts have recommended that WQT partner with EQIP to recruit farmers, yet the literature lacks an analysis of whether EQIP could adequately substitute for WQT's project selection process. In this article, we systematically compare the project ranking procedures used by WQT and EQIP and suggest which partnership structures might be most appropriate.

AB - Water Quality Trading (WQT) and federal conservation programs such as the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) employ incentive payments to encourage agricultural best management practices (BMPs). In many cases, WQT and EQIP are encouraging the same types of farmers to implement the same types of BMPs using similar incentive payments. A number of analysts have recommended that WQT partner with EQIP to recruit farmers, yet the literature lacks an analysis of whether EQIP could adequately substitute for WQT's project selection process. In this article, we systematically compare the project ranking procedures used by WQT and EQIP and suggest which partnership structures might be most appropriate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34147137266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34147137266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2007.00338.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2007.00338.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34147137266

VL - 29

SP - 201

EP - 215

JO - Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy

JF - Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy

SN - 2040-5790

IS - 2

ER -