Does expressing subjectivity in online reviews enhance persuasion?

Stephanie Q. Liu, Marie Ozanne, Anna S. Mattila

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: People express subjectivity and objectivity in everyday communication, yet little is known about how such linguistic content affects persuasion in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM). Drawing on the congruity theory and the selectivity model, the present study proposes that the effectiveness of subjectivity/objectivity expressions in an online review is contingent on whether the consumption experience is primarily hedonic or utilitarian, and whether the decision maker is a male or female. Furthermore, this study aims to examine the psychological mechanism that underlies the proposed effects. Design/methodology/approach: This research used an experimental design to test the hypotheses. Four versions of online review stimuli were created. Participants were asked to read the online reviews and to complete a survey. Findings: The findings indicate that expressing subjectivity (vs objectivity) in online reviews effectively boosts men’s purchase intention in the hedonic context and women’s purchase intention in the utilitarian context. Furthermore, the mediation analysis reveals that perceived relevance of the review is the psychological mechanism explaining the joint effects of linguistic style, consumption type and gender on purchase intention. Originality/value: This research is the first to examine expressing subjectivity (vs objectivity) as a persuasion strategy in online reviews. Findings of this research add to the growing literature on linguistic effects in eWOM. Furthermore, this research deepens the understanding of conversational norms for hedonic vs utilitarian consumption in consumer-generated content and gender differences in processing online reviews.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)403-413
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Consumer Marketing
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 11 2018

Fingerprint

Online reviews
Subjectivity
Persuasion
Objectivity
Purchase intention
Electronic word-of-mouth
Psychological
Communication
Decision maker
Gender differences
Experimental design
Consumption experience
Design methodology
Mediation
Selectivity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Marketing

Cite this

Liu, Stephanie Q. ; Ozanne, Marie ; Mattila, Anna S. / Does expressing subjectivity in online reviews enhance persuasion?. In: Journal of Consumer Marketing. 2018 ; Vol. 35, No. 4. pp. 403-413.
@article{35a5f6c260f34c6bb4f494582714eebf,
title = "Does expressing subjectivity in online reviews enhance persuasion?",
abstract = "Purpose: People express subjectivity and objectivity in everyday communication, yet little is known about how such linguistic content affects persuasion in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM). Drawing on the congruity theory and the selectivity model, the present study proposes that the effectiveness of subjectivity/objectivity expressions in an online review is contingent on whether the consumption experience is primarily hedonic or utilitarian, and whether the decision maker is a male or female. Furthermore, this study aims to examine the psychological mechanism that underlies the proposed effects. Design/methodology/approach: This research used an experimental design to test the hypotheses. Four versions of online review stimuli were created. Participants were asked to read the online reviews and to complete a survey. Findings: The findings indicate that expressing subjectivity (vs objectivity) in online reviews effectively boosts men’s purchase intention in the hedonic context and women’s purchase intention in the utilitarian context. Furthermore, the mediation analysis reveals that perceived relevance of the review is the psychological mechanism explaining the joint effects of linguistic style, consumption type and gender on purchase intention. Originality/value: This research is the first to examine expressing subjectivity (vs objectivity) as a persuasion strategy in online reviews. Findings of this research add to the growing literature on linguistic effects in eWOM. Furthermore, this research deepens the understanding of conversational norms for hedonic vs utilitarian consumption in consumer-generated content and gender differences in processing online reviews.",
author = "Liu, {Stephanie Q.} and Marie Ozanne and Mattila, {Anna S.}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1108/JCM-02-2017-2109",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "403--413",
journal = "Journal of Consumer Marketing",
issn = "0736-3761",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

Does expressing subjectivity in online reviews enhance persuasion? / Liu, Stephanie Q.; Ozanne, Marie; Mattila, Anna S.

In: Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 35, No. 4, 11.06.2018, p. 403-413.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does expressing subjectivity in online reviews enhance persuasion?

AU - Liu, Stephanie Q.

AU - Ozanne, Marie

AU - Mattila, Anna S.

PY - 2018/6/11

Y1 - 2018/6/11

N2 - Purpose: People express subjectivity and objectivity in everyday communication, yet little is known about how such linguistic content affects persuasion in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM). Drawing on the congruity theory and the selectivity model, the present study proposes that the effectiveness of subjectivity/objectivity expressions in an online review is contingent on whether the consumption experience is primarily hedonic or utilitarian, and whether the decision maker is a male or female. Furthermore, this study aims to examine the psychological mechanism that underlies the proposed effects. Design/methodology/approach: This research used an experimental design to test the hypotheses. Four versions of online review stimuli were created. Participants were asked to read the online reviews and to complete a survey. Findings: The findings indicate that expressing subjectivity (vs objectivity) in online reviews effectively boosts men’s purchase intention in the hedonic context and women’s purchase intention in the utilitarian context. Furthermore, the mediation analysis reveals that perceived relevance of the review is the psychological mechanism explaining the joint effects of linguistic style, consumption type and gender on purchase intention. Originality/value: This research is the first to examine expressing subjectivity (vs objectivity) as a persuasion strategy in online reviews. Findings of this research add to the growing literature on linguistic effects in eWOM. Furthermore, this research deepens the understanding of conversational norms for hedonic vs utilitarian consumption in consumer-generated content and gender differences in processing online reviews.

AB - Purpose: People express subjectivity and objectivity in everyday communication, yet little is known about how such linguistic content affects persuasion in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM). Drawing on the congruity theory and the selectivity model, the present study proposes that the effectiveness of subjectivity/objectivity expressions in an online review is contingent on whether the consumption experience is primarily hedonic or utilitarian, and whether the decision maker is a male or female. Furthermore, this study aims to examine the psychological mechanism that underlies the proposed effects. Design/methodology/approach: This research used an experimental design to test the hypotheses. Four versions of online review stimuli were created. Participants were asked to read the online reviews and to complete a survey. Findings: The findings indicate that expressing subjectivity (vs objectivity) in online reviews effectively boosts men’s purchase intention in the hedonic context and women’s purchase intention in the utilitarian context. Furthermore, the mediation analysis reveals that perceived relevance of the review is the psychological mechanism explaining the joint effects of linguistic style, consumption type and gender on purchase intention. Originality/value: This research is the first to examine expressing subjectivity (vs objectivity) as a persuasion strategy in online reviews. Findings of this research add to the growing literature on linguistic effects in eWOM. Furthermore, this research deepens the understanding of conversational norms for hedonic vs utilitarian consumption in consumer-generated content and gender differences in processing online reviews.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051678527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051678527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/JCM-02-2017-2109

DO - 10.1108/JCM-02-2017-2109

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85051678527

VL - 35

SP - 403

EP - 413

JO - Journal of Consumer Marketing

JF - Journal of Consumer Marketing

SN - 0736-3761

IS - 4

ER -