Does it matter that the prosecutor is also the judge? The administrative complaint process at the federal trade commission

Malcolm B. Coate, Andrew N. Kleit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Firms seeking to merge face antitrust scrutiny from either the Department of Justice (DOJ) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Unlike the DOJ, the FTC litigates its cases in front of its own administrative law judges (ALJs), and then hears the appeal itself, rather than using federal district courts. This study focuses on the formal decisions made by the FTC after an ALJ has conducted a full trial for a particular case. We find that while the ‘merits’ of a matter, as implied by the case law, affect the FTC’s decision, institutional factors also have an impact. In particular, the firm’s chances of prevailing in litigation are influenced by the number of commissioners who both vote to prosecute and then vote as a judge as well as the political affiliations of the commissioners.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalManagerial and Decision Economics
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1998

Fingerprint

Complaints
Federal Trade Commission
Vote
Administrative law
Justice
Litigation
Institutional factors

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

@article{3849b375f5194bffbd6ab571a9a4b7f0,
title = "Does it matter that the prosecutor is also the judge? The administrative complaint process at the federal trade commission",
abstract = "Firms seeking to merge face antitrust scrutiny from either the Department of Justice (DOJ) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Unlike the DOJ, the FTC litigates its cases in front of its own administrative law judges (ALJs), and then hears the appeal itself, rather than using federal district courts. This study focuses on the formal decisions made by the FTC after an ALJ has conducted a full trial for a particular case. We find that while the ‘merits’ of a matter, as implied by the case law, affect the FTC’s decision, institutional factors also have an impact. In particular, the firm’s chances of prevailing in litigation are influenced by the number of commissioners who both vote to prosecute and then vote as a judge as well as the political affiliations of the commissioners.",
author = "Coate, {Malcolm B.} and Kleit, {Andrew N.}",
year = "1998",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1002/(SICI)1099-1468(199802)19:1<1::AID-MDE840>3.0.CO;2-G",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Managerial and Decision Economics",
issn = "0143-6570",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does it matter that the prosecutor is also the judge? The administrative complaint process at the federal trade commission

AU - Coate, Malcolm B.

AU - Kleit, Andrew N.

PY - 1998/2

Y1 - 1998/2

N2 - Firms seeking to merge face antitrust scrutiny from either the Department of Justice (DOJ) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Unlike the DOJ, the FTC litigates its cases in front of its own administrative law judges (ALJs), and then hears the appeal itself, rather than using federal district courts. This study focuses on the formal decisions made by the FTC after an ALJ has conducted a full trial for a particular case. We find that while the ‘merits’ of a matter, as implied by the case law, affect the FTC’s decision, institutional factors also have an impact. In particular, the firm’s chances of prevailing in litigation are influenced by the number of commissioners who both vote to prosecute and then vote as a judge as well as the political affiliations of the commissioners.

AB - Firms seeking to merge face antitrust scrutiny from either the Department of Justice (DOJ) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Unlike the DOJ, the FTC litigates its cases in front of its own administrative law judges (ALJs), and then hears the appeal itself, rather than using federal district courts. This study focuses on the formal decisions made by the FTC after an ALJ has conducted a full trial for a particular case. We find that while the ‘merits’ of a matter, as implied by the case law, affect the FTC’s decision, institutional factors also have an impact. In particular, the firm’s chances of prevailing in litigation are influenced by the number of commissioners who both vote to prosecute and then vote as a judge as well as the political affiliations of the commissioners.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=66849096843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=66849096843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1468(199802)19:1<1::AID-MDE840>3.0.CO;2-G

DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1468(199802)19:1<1::AID-MDE840>3.0.CO;2-G

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:66849096843

VL - 19

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Managerial and Decision Economics

JF - Managerial and Decision Economics

SN - 0143-6570

IS - 1

ER -