Does socioeconomic status matter? Race, class, and residential segregation

John David Iceland, Rima Wilkes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

176 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Spatial assimilation theory predicts that racial and ethnic residential segregation results at least in part from socioeconomic differences across groups. In contrast, the place stratification perspective emphasizes the role of prejudice and discrimination in shaping residential patterns. This article evaluates these perspectives by examining the role of race and class in explaining the residential segregation of African Americans, Hispanics, and Asians from non-Hispanic whites in all U.S. metropolitan areas over the 1990 to 2000 period. Using the dissimilarity index and various indicators of socioeconomic status (SES), we find that in both 1990 and 2000 high-SES racial and ethnic groups were significantly less segregated from non-Hispanic whites than corresponding low-SES groups, especially among Hispanics and Asians - much as the spatial assimilation model would predict. Consistent with the place stratification model, African Americans of all SES levels continued to be more segregated from whites than were Hispanics and Asians, and this changed little between 1990 and 2000. However, the importance of SES in explaining the segregation of African Americans from whites increased over the period, while not for Hispanics and Asian Americans, providing support for a modest increase in the applicability of the spatial assimilation model for African Americans in the 1990s.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)248-273
Number of pages26
JournalSocial Problems
Volume53
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2006

Fingerprint

segregation
social status
assimilation
status group
prejudice
agglomeration area
ethnic group
discrimination
American
Group

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{4ff4d7a6a1b24af19d1d6dc300a162c8,
title = "Does socioeconomic status matter? Race, class, and residential segregation",
abstract = "Spatial assimilation theory predicts that racial and ethnic residential segregation results at least in part from socioeconomic differences across groups. In contrast, the place stratification perspective emphasizes the role of prejudice and discrimination in shaping residential patterns. This article evaluates these perspectives by examining the role of race and class in explaining the residential segregation of African Americans, Hispanics, and Asians from non-Hispanic whites in all U.S. metropolitan areas over the 1990 to 2000 period. Using the dissimilarity index and various indicators of socioeconomic status (SES), we find that in both 1990 and 2000 high-SES racial and ethnic groups were significantly less segregated from non-Hispanic whites than corresponding low-SES groups, especially among Hispanics and Asians - much as the spatial assimilation model would predict. Consistent with the place stratification model, African Americans of all SES levels continued to be more segregated from whites than were Hispanics and Asians, and this changed little between 1990 and 2000. However, the importance of SES in explaining the segregation of African Americans from whites increased over the period, while not for Hispanics and Asian Americans, providing support for a modest increase in the applicability of the spatial assimilation model for African Americans in the 1990s.",
author = "Iceland, {John David} and Rima Wilkes",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1525/sp.2006.53.2.248",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "248--273",
journal = "Social Problems",
issn = "0037-7791",
publisher = "University of California Press",
number = "2",

}

Does socioeconomic status matter? Race, class, and residential segregation. / Iceland, John David; Wilkes, Rima.

In: Social Problems, Vol. 53, No. 2, 01.05.2006, p. 248-273.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does socioeconomic status matter? Race, class, and residential segregation

AU - Iceland, John David

AU - Wilkes, Rima

PY - 2006/5/1

Y1 - 2006/5/1

N2 - Spatial assimilation theory predicts that racial and ethnic residential segregation results at least in part from socioeconomic differences across groups. In contrast, the place stratification perspective emphasizes the role of prejudice and discrimination in shaping residential patterns. This article evaluates these perspectives by examining the role of race and class in explaining the residential segregation of African Americans, Hispanics, and Asians from non-Hispanic whites in all U.S. metropolitan areas over the 1990 to 2000 period. Using the dissimilarity index and various indicators of socioeconomic status (SES), we find that in both 1990 and 2000 high-SES racial and ethnic groups were significantly less segregated from non-Hispanic whites than corresponding low-SES groups, especially among Hispanics and Asians - much as the spatial assimilation model would predict. Consistent with the place stratification model, African Americans of all SES levels continued to be more segregated from whites than were Hispanics and Asians, and this changed little between 1990 and 2000. However, the importance of SES in explaining the segregation of African Americans from whites increased over the period, while not for Hispanics and Asian Americans, providing support for a modest increase in the applicability of the spatial assimilation model for African Americans in the 1990s.

AB - Spatial assimilation theory predicts that racial and ethnic residential segregation results at least in part from socioeconomic differences across groups. In contrast, the place stratification perspective emphasizes the role of prejudice and discrimination in shaping residential patterns. This article evaluates these perspectives by examining the role of race and class in explaining the residential segregation of African Americans, Hispanics, and Asians from non-Hispanic whites in all U.S. metropolitan areas over the 1990 to 2000 period. Using the dissimilarity index and various indicators of socioeconomic status (SES), we find that in both 1990 and 2000 high-SES racial and ethnic groups were significantly less segregated from non-Hispanic whites than corresponding low-SES groups, especially among Hispanics and Asians - much as the spatial assimilation model would predict. Consistent with the place stratification model, African Americans of all SES levels continued to be more segregated from whites than were Hispanics and Asians, and this changed little between 1990 and 2000. However, the importance of SES in explaining the segregation of African Americans from whites increased over the period, while not for Hispanics and Asian Americans, providing support for a modest increase in the applicability of the spatial assimilation model for African Americans in the 1990s.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646159990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646159990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1525/sp.2006.53.2.248

DO - 10.1525/sp.2006.53.2.248

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 248

EP - 273

JO - Social Problems

JF - Social Problems

SN - 0037-7791

IS - 2

ER -