Dominating defects in the MOS system: Pband E’ centers

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two types of silicon dangling bond centers play dominating roles in metal=oxide=silicon (MOS) device limitations. Silicon dangling bonds defects at the Si=SiO2boundary, Pbcenters dominate Si=SiO2interface trapping. Silicon dangling bond defects called E’ centers dominate deep levels in the oxide. E’ centers can also play dominating roles in the electronic properties of the near Si=SiO2interface dielectrics, serving as switching traps or border traps (Chapter 7). Under some circumstances, some E0 centers also act as interface traps. Analysis of a combination of electron spin resonance (ESR) and electrical measurements provides a fairly detailed understanding of the relationship between the structure and electronic properties of the Pbinterface centers and E0 oxide centers. Straightforward application of the fundamental principles of statistical mechanics provides a partial explanation of the frequently noted correlation between oxide deep level defects and Si=SiO2interface trap defects. This chapter reviews the spectroscopy, electronic properties, and device relevance of these two families of defects. Since the understanding of the defects has come from ESR, the chapter begins with a brief introduction to this technique. It is important to note that Pband E’ centers are not necessarily the only electrically active point defects in MOS devices. Although many studies have established the dominating roles of these two families of silicon dangling bond centers, the limited precision of ESR measurements as well as that of the relevant electrical measurements precludes concluding with certainty that either defect is entirely responsible for any device limitation. However, they are clearly responsible for the majority of the deep levels in most and perhaps all the phenomena discussed in this chapter. Furthermore, under some circumstances, it is clear that other defects are playing important roles. For example, the addition of nitrogen introduces greater complexity in plasma-nitrided gate oxides. Not surprisingly, several very different defects clearly play important roles in gate stacks based on hafnium oxide=silicon dioxide systems. Several decades of ESR [1] studies of the MOS system have established the roles of these two families of silicon dangling bond defects in MOS device instabilities. At the Si=SiO2boundary the Pbcenter family dominates interface trapping under many circumstances [2-32]. Largely due to the simplicity of the ESR spectroscopy, most earlier studies focused upon the (111) Si=SiO2interface, where only one Pbdefect, called simply Pb, appears [2-15].

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationDefects in Microelectronic Materials and Devices
PublisherCRC Press
Pages163-214
Number of pages52
ISBN (Electronic)9781420043778
ISBN (Print)9781420043761
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

Silicon oxides
metal oxides
Metals
Defects
Dangling bonds
defects
silicon
Silicon
electron paramagnetic resonance
Oxides
Paramagnetic resonance
traps
Electronic properties
oxides
electrical measurement
trapping
electronics
Hafnium oxides
Electron spin resonance spectroscopy
hafnium oxides

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Engineering(all)
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Lenahan, P. M. (2008). Dominating defects in the MOS system: Pband E’ centers. In Defects in Microelectronic Materials and Devices (pp. 163-214). CRC Press.
Lenahan, Patrick M. / Dominating defects in the MOS system : Pband E’ centers. Defects in Microelectronic Materials and Devices. CRC Press, 2008. pp. 163-214
@inbook{47f38cc9af084bf5b9b5bb81a53e069d,
title = "Dominating defects in the MOS system: Pband E’ centers",
abstract = "Two types of silicon dangling bond centers play dominating roles in metal=oxide=silicon (MOS) device limitations. Silicon dangling bonds defects at the Si=SiO2boundary, Pbcenters dominate Si=SiO2interface trapping. Silicon dangling bond defects called E’ centers dominate deep levels in the oxide. E’ centers can also play dominating roles in the electronic properties of the near Si=SiO2interface dielectrics, serving as switching traps or border traps (Chapter 7). Under some circumstances, some E0 centers also act as interface traps. Analysis of a combination of electron spin resonance (ESR) and electrical measurements provides a fairly detailed understanding of the relationship between the structure and electronic properties of the Pbinterface centers and E0 oxide centers. Straightforward application of the fundamental principles of statistical mechanics provides a partial explanation of the frequently noted correlation between oxide deep level defects and Si=SiO2interface trap defects. This chapter reviews the spectroscopy, electronic properties, and device relevance of these two families of defects. Since the understanding of the defects has come from ESR, the chapter begins with a brief introduction to this technique. It is important to note that Pband E’ centers are not necessarily the only electrically active point defects in MOS devices. Although many studies have established the dominating roles of these two families of silicon dangling bond centers, the limited precision of ESR measurements as well as that of the relevant electrical measurements precludes concluding with certainty that either defect is entirely responsible for any device limitation. However, they are clearly responsible for the majority of the deep levels in most and perhaps all the phenomena discussed in this chapter. Furthermore, under some circumstances, it is clear that other defects are playing important roles. For example, the addition of nitrogen introduces greater complexity in plasma-nitrided gate oxides. Not surprisingly, several very different defects clearly play important roles in gate stacks based on hafnium oxide=silicon dioxide systems. Several decades of ESR [1] studies of the MOS system have established the roles of these two families of silicon dangling bond defects in MOS device instabilities. At the Si=SiO2boundary the Pbcenter family dominates interface trapping under many circumstances [2-32]. Largely due to the simplicity of the ESR spectroscopy, most earlier studies focused upon the (111) Si=SiO2interface, where only one Pbdefect, called simply Pb, appears [2-15].",
author = "Lenahan, {Patrick M.}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781420043761",
pages = "163--214",
booktitle = "Defects in Microelectronic Materials and Devices",
publisher = "CRC Press",

}

Lenahan, PM 2008, Dominating defects in the MOS system: Pband E’ centers. in Defects in Microelectronic Materials and Devices. CRC Press, pp. 163-214.

Dominating defects in the MOS system : Pband E’ centers. / Lenahan, Patrick M.

Defects in Microelectronic Materials and Devices. CRC Press, 2008. p. 163-214.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Dominating defects in the MOS system

T2 - Pband E’ centers

AU - Lenahan, Patrick M.

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Two types of silicon dangling bond centers play dominating roles in metal=oxide=silicon (MOS) device limitations. Silicon dangling bonds defects at the Si=SiO2boundary, Pbcenters dominate Si=SiO2interface trapping. Silicon dangling bond defects called E’ centers dominate deep levels in the oxide. E’ centers can also play dominating roles in the electronic properties of the near Si=SiO2interface dielectrics, serving as switching traps or border traps (Chapter 7). Under some circumstances, some E0 centers also act as interface traps. Analysis of a combination of electron spin resonance (ESR) and electrical measurements provides a fairly detailed understanding of the relationship between the structure and electronic properties of the Pbinterface centers and E0 oxide centers. Straightforward application of the fundamental principles of statistical mechanics provides a partial explanation of the frequently noted correlation between oxide deep level defects and Si=SiO2interface trap defects. This chapter reviews the spectroscopy, electronic properties, and device relevance of these two families of defects. Since the understanding of the defects has come from ESR, the chapter begins with a brief introduction to this technique. It is important to note that Pband E’ centers are not necessarily the only electrically active point defects in MOS devices. Although many studies have established the dominating roles of these two families of silicon dangling bond centers, the limited precision of ESR measurements as well as that of the relevant electrical measurements precludes concluding with certainty that either defect is entirely responsible for any device limitation. However, they are clearly responsible for the majority of the deep levels in most and perhaps all the phenomena discussed in this chapter. Furthermore, under some circumstances, it is clear that other defects are playing important roles. For example, the addition of nitrogen introduces greater complexity in plasma-nitrided gate oxides. Not surprisingly, several very different defects clearly play important roles in gate stacks based on hafnium oxide=silicon dioxide systems. Several decades of ESR [1] studies of the MOS system have established the roles of these two families of silicon dangling bond defects in MOS device instabilities. At the Si=SiO2boundary the Pbcenter family dominates interface trapping under many circumstances [2-32]. Largely due to the simplicity of the ESR spectroscopy, most earlier studies focused upon the (111) Si=SiO2interface, where only one Pbdefect, called simply Pb, appears [2-15].

AB - Two types of silicon dangling bond centers play dominating roles in metal=oxide=silicon (MOS) device limitations. Silicon dangling bonds defects at the Si=SiO2boundary, Pbcenters dominate Si=SiO2interface trapping. Silicon dangling bond defects called E’ centers dominate deep levels in the oxide. E’ centers can also play dominating roles in the electronic properties of the near Si=SiO2interface dielectrics, serving as switching traps or border traps (Chapter 7). Under some circumstances, some E0 centers also act as interface traps. Analysis of a combination of electron spin resonance (ESR) and electrical measurements provides a fairly detailed understanding of the relationship between the structure and electronic properties of the Pbinterface centers and E0 oxide centers. Straightforward application of the fundamental principles of statistical mechanics provides a partial explanation of the frequently noted correlation between oxide deep level defects and Si=SiO2interface trap defects. This chapter reviews the spectroscopy, electronic properties, and device relevance of these two families of defects. Since the understanding of the defects has come from ESR, the chapter begins with a brief introduction to this technique. It is important to note that Pband E’ centers are not necessarily the only electrically active point defects in MOS devices. Although many studies have established the dominating roles of these two families of silicon dangling bond centers, the limited precision of ESR measurements as well as that of the relevant electrical measurements precludes concluding with certainty that either defect is entirely responsible for any device limitation. However, they are clearly responsible for the majority of the deep levels in most and perhaps all the phenomena discussed in this chapter. Furthermore, under some circumstances, it is clear that other defects are playing important roles. For example, the addition of nitrogen introduces greater complexity in plasma-nitrided gate oxides. Not surprisingly, several very different defects clearly play important roles in gate stacks based on hafnium oxide=silicon dioxide systems. Several decades of ESR [1] studies of the MOS system have established the roles of these two families of silicon dangling bond defects in MOS device instabilities. At the Si=SiO2boundary the Pbcenter family dominates interface trapping under many circumstances [2-32]. Largely due to the simplicity of the ESR spectroscopy, most earlier studies focused upon the (111) Si=SiO2interface, where only one Pbdefect, called simply Pb, appears [2-15].

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050575535&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050575535&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85050575535

SN - 9781420043761

SP - 163

EP - 214

BT - Defects in Microelectronic Materials and Devices

PB - CRC Press

ER -

Lenahan PM. Dominating defects in the MOS system: Pband E’ centers. In Defects in Microelectronic Materials and Devices. CRC Press. 2008. p. 163-214