Drinking-and-Driving in America: A Test of Behavioral Assumptions Underlying Public Policy

David J. Houston, Lilliard E. Richardson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since the 1980s, states have increasingly used sanctions to deter people from drinking-and-driving, but the effectiveness of these policies is questionable. The use of sanctions as policy tools rests on deterrence theory, but little is known about the appropriateness of its behavioral assumptions for the group targeted by policy the drinking-driver. Employing a national survey of 4,008 respondents, we use logistic regression analysis to examine perceptions of punishment costs, the importance of individual versus societal costs, and policy preferences related to drink-driving. It was found that the perceptions of the punishment costs of drinking-and-driving are not consistent with basic hypotheses of deterrence theory. The results suggest that policies based on deterrence theory are likely to be least effective for the main target of these policies (frequent drink-drivers) and are likely to be unnecessary for non-drink-drivers. An alternative set of behavioral assumptions is provided that more closely fit the results obtained.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)53-64
Number of pages12
JournalPolitical Research Quarterly
Volume57
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2004

Fingerprint

deterrence
public policy
driver
sanction
penalty
costs
regression analysis
logistics
Group

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{f6b6d8bf4d144fff890bb39b16d20951,
title = "Drinking-and-Driving in America: A Test of Behavioral Assumptions Underlying Public Policy",
abstract = "Since the 1980s, states have increasingly used sanctions to deter people from drinking-and-driving, but the effectiveness of these policies is questionable. The use of sanctions as policy tools rests on deterrence theory, but little is known about the appropriateness of its behavioral assumptions for the group targeted by policy the drinking-driver. Employing a national survey of 4,008 respondents, we use logistic regression analysis to examine perceptions of punishment costs, the importance of individual versus societal costs, and policy preferences related to drink-driving. It was found that the perceptions of the punishment costs of drinking-and-driving are not consistent with basic hypotheses of deterrence theory. The results suggest that policies based on deterrence theory are likely to be least effective for the main target of these policies (frequent drink-drivers) and are likely to be unnecessary for non-drink-drivers. An alternative set of behavioral assumptions is provided that more closely fit the results obtained.",
author = "Houston, {David J.} and Richardson, {Lilliard E.}",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1177/106591290405700105",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "53--64",
journal = "Political Research Quarterly",
issn = "1065-9129",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Drinking-and-Driving in America : A Test of Behavioral Assumptions Underlying Public Policy. / Houston, David J.; Richardson, Lilliard E.

In: Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 57, No. 1, 03.2004, p. 53-64.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Drinking-and-Driving in America

T2 - A Test of Behavioral Assumptions Underlying Public Policy

AU - Houston, David J.

AU - Richardson, Lilliard E.

PY - 2004/3

Y1 - 2004/3

N2 - Since the 1980s, states have increasingly used sanctions to deter people from drinking-and-driving, but the effectiveness of these policies is questionable. The use of sanctions as policy tools rests on deterrence theory, but little is known about the appropriateness of its behavioral assumptions for the group targeted by policy the drinking-driver. Employing a national survey of 4,008 respondents, we use logistic regression analysis to examine perceptions of punishment costs, the importance of individual versus societal costs, and policy preferences related to drink-driving. It was found that the perceptions of the punishment costs of drinking-and-driving are not consistent with basic hypotheses of deterrence theory. The results suggest that policies based on deterrence theory are likely to be least effective for the main target of these policies (frequent drink-drivers) and are likely to be unnecessary for non-drink-drivers. An alternative set of behavioral assumptions is provided that more closely fit the results obtained.

AB - Since the 1980s, states have increasingly used sanctions to deter people from drinking-and-driving, but the effectiveness of these policies is questionable. The use of sanctions as policy tools rests on deterrence theory, but little is known about the appropriateness of its behavioral assumptions for the group targeted by policy the drinking-driver. Employing a national survey of 4,008 respondents, we use logistic regression analysis to examine perceptions of punishment costs, the importance of individual versus societal costs, and policy preferences related to drink-driving. It was found that the perceptions of the punishment costs of drinking-and-driving are not consistent with basic hypotheses of deterrence theory. The results suggest that policies based on deterrence theory are likely to be least effective for the main target of these policies (frequent drink-drivers) and are likely to be unnecessary for non-drink-drivers. An alternative set of behavioral assumptions is provided that more closely fit the results obtained.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2142815363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2142815363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/106591290405700105

DO - 10.1177/106591290405700105

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:2142815363

VL - 57

SP - 53

EP - 64

JO - Political Research Quarterly

JF - Political Research Quarterly

SN - 1065-9129

IS - 1

ER -