Dual conversations: Body talk among young women and their social contacts

Maureen O'Dougherty, Kathryn H. Schmitz, Mary O. Hearst, Michaela Covelli, Mindy S. Kurzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, we explore an area little researched within the literature on body dissatisfaction: the content and functions of body talk. We interviewed 60 diverse, college-educated women aged 18 to 30 in the urban United States about how social contacts talked about their bodies. Half the women, and by their reports, half their contacts (N = 295) endorsed some ideal body, most often the thin model. The other half favored a "healthy," "average" range in body size, shape, and/or appearance. Excepting family members, contacts gave mostly positive comments about women's bodies or appearance, or made no comments. Many critiqued their own bodies, however, as did nearly half the women participants. We suggest that these women exempted others, but not themselves, from critical body surveillance, rendering contestation of the ideal theoretical. We also suggest that the parallel airing of self-criticism repeatedly circulated through speech, if not through practice, the imperative to regulate one's own gendered body toward unattainable normativity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1191-1204
Number of pages14
JournalQualitative Health Research
Volume21
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2011

Fingerprint

Body Size
Self-Assessment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

O'Dougherty, Maureen ; Schmitz, Kathryn H. ; Hearst, Mary O. ; Covelli, Michaela ; Kurzer, Mindy S. / Dual conversations : Body talk among young women and their social contacts. In: Qualitative Health Research. 2011 ; Vol. 21, No. 9. pp. 1191-1204.
@article{e4c43f85fffc4a59899e22298180c76c,
title = "Dual conversations: Body talk among young women and their social contacts",
abstract = "In this article, we explore an area little researched within the literature on body dissatisfaction: the content and functions of body talk. We interviewed 60 diverse, college-educated women aged 18 to 30 in the urban United States about how social contacts talked about their bodies. Half the women, and by their reports, half their contacts (N = 295) endorsed some ideal body, most often the thin model. The other half favored a {"}healthy,{"} {"}average{"} range in body size, shape, and/or appearance. Excepting family members, contacts gave mostly positive comments about women's bodies or appearance, or made no comments. Many critiqued their own bodies, however, as did nearly half the women participants. We suggest that these women exempted others, but not themselves, from critical body surveillance, rendering contestation of the ideal theoretical. We also suggest that the parallel airing of self-criticism repeatedly circulated through speech, if not through practice, the imperative to regulate one's own gendered body toward unattainable normativity.",
author = "Maureen O'Dougherty and Schmitz, {Kathryn H.} and Hearst, {Mary O.} and Michaela Covelli and Kurzer, {Mindy S.}",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1049732311405804",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "1191--1204",
journal = "Qualitative Health Research",
issn = "1049-7323",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "9",

}

Dual conversations : Body talk among young women and their social contacts. / O'Dougherty, Maureen; Schmitz, Kathryn H.; Hearst, Mary O.; Covelli, Michaela; Kurzer, Mindy S.

In: Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 21, No. 9, 01.09.2011, p. 1191-1204.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dual conversations

T2 - Body talk among young women and their social contacts

AU - O'Dougherty, Maureen

AU - Schmitz, Kathryn H.

AU - Hearst, Mary O.

AU - Covelli, Michaela

AU - Kurzer, Mindy S.

PY - 2011/9/1

Y1 - 2011/9/1

N2 - In this article, we explore an area little researched within the literature on body dissatisfaction: the content and functions of body talk. We interviewed 60 diverse, college-educated women aged 18 to 30 in the urban United States about how social contacts talked about their bodies. Half the women, and by their reports, half their contacts (N = 295) endorsed some ideal body, most often the thin model. The other half favored a "healthy," "average" range in body size, shape, and/or appearance. Excepting family members, contacts gave mostly positive comments about women's bodies or appearance, or made no comments. Many critiqued their own bodies, however, as did nearly half the women participants. We suggest that these women exempted others, but not themselves, from critical body surveillance, rendering contestation of the ideal theoretical. We also suggest that the parallel airing of self-criticism repeatedly circulated through speech, if not through practice, the imperative to regulate one's own gendered body toward unattainable normativity.

AB - In this article, we explore an area little researched within the literature on body dissatisfaction: the content and functions of body talk. We interviewed 60 diverse, college-educated women aged 18 to 30 in the urban United States about how social contacts talked about their bodies. Half the women, and by their reports, half their contacts (N = 295) endorsed some ideal body, most often the thin model. The other half favored a "healthy," "average" range in body size, shape, and/or appearance. Excepting family members, contacts gave mostly positive comments about women's bodies or appearance, or made no comments. Many critiqued their own bodies, however, as did nearly half the women participants. We suggest that these women exempted others, but not themselves, from critical body surveillance, rendering contestation of the ideal theoretical. We also suggest that the parallel airing of self-criticism repeatedly circulated through speech, if not through practice, the imperative to regulate one's own gendered body toward unattainable normativity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051526475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80051526475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1049732311405804

DO - 10.1177/1049732311405804

M3 - Article

C2 - 21508251

AN - SCOPUS:80051526475

VL - 21

SP - 1191

EP - 1204

JO - Qualitative Health Research

JF - Qualitative Health Research

SN - 1049-7323

IS - 9

ER -