Dynamic stability of passive dynamic walking on an irregular surface

Jimmy Li Shin Su, Jonathan B. Dingwell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Falls that occur during walking are a significant health problem. One of the greatest impediments to solve this problem is that there is no single obviously "correct" way to quantify walking stability. While many people use variability as a proxy for stability, measures of variability do not quantify how the locomotor system responds to perturbations. The purpose of this study was to determine how changes in walking surface variability affect changes in both locomotor variability and stability. We modified an irreducibly simple model of walking to apply random perturbations that simulated walking over an irregular surface. Because the model's global basin of attraction remained fixed, increasing the amplitude of the applied perturbations directly increased the risk of falling in the model. We generated ten simulations of 300 consecutive strides of walking at each of six perturbation amplitudes ranging from zero (i.e., a smooth continuous surface) up to the maximum level the model could tolerate without falling over. Orbital stability defines how a system responds to small (i.e., "local") perturbations from one cycle to the next and was quantified by calculating the maximum Floquet multipliers for the model. Local stability defines how a system responds to similar perturbations in real time and was quantified by calculating short-term and long-term local exponential rates of divergence for the model. As perturbation amplitudes increased, no changes were seen in orbital stability (r2 = 2.43%; p = 0.280) or long-term local instability (r2 = 1.0%; p = 0.441). These measures essentially reflected the fact that the model never actually "fell" during any of our simulations. Conversely, the variability of the walker's kinematics increased exponentially (r2 ≥ 99.6%; p < 0.001) and short-term local instability increased linearly ( r2 = 88.1%; p < 0.001). These measures thus predicted the increased risk of falling exhibited by the model. For all simulated conditions, the walker remained orbitally stable, while exhibiting substantial local instability. This was because very small initial perturbations diverged away from the limit cycle, while larger initial perturbations converged toward the limit cycle. These results provide insight into how these different proposed measures of walking stability are related to each other and to risk of falling.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)802-810
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
Volume129
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2007

Fingerprint

Walking
Accidental Falls
Proxy
Biomechanical Phenomena
Medical problems
Kinematics
Health

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

@article{65c8201c90e9451ea5c9b3cea4e0e2e7,
title = "Dynamic stability of passive dynamic walking on an irregular surface",
abstract = "Falls that occur during walking are a significant health problem. One of the greatest impediments to solve this problem is that there is no single obviously {"}correct{"} way to quantify walking stability. While many people use variability as a proxy for stability, measures of variability do not quantify how the locomotor system responds to perturbations. The purpose of this study was to determine how changes in walking surface variability affect changes in both locomotor variability and stability. We modified an irreducibly simple model of walking to apply random perturbations that simulated walking over an irregular surface. Because the model's global basin of attraction remained fixed, increasing the amplitude of the applied perturbations directly increased the risk of falling in the model. We generated ten simulations of 300 consecutive strides of walking at each of six perturbation amplitudes ranging from zero (i.e., a smooth continuous surface) up to the maximum level the model could tolerate without falling over. Orbital stability defines how a system responds to small (i.e., {"}local{"}) perturbations from one cycle to the next and was quantified by calculating the maximum Floquet multipliers for the model. Local stability defines how a system responds to similar perturbations in real time and was quantified by calculating short-term and long-term local exponential rates of divergence for the model. As perturbation amplitudes increased, no changes were seen in orbital stability (r2 = 2.43{\%}; p = 0.280) or long-term local instability (r2 = 1.0{\%}; p = 0.441). These measures essentially reflected the fact that the model never actually {"}fell{"} during any of our simulations. Conversely, the variability of the walker's kinematics increased exponentially (r2 ≥ 99.6{\%}; p < 0.001) and short-term local instability increased linearly ( r2 = 88.1{\%}; p < 0.001). These measures thus predicted the increased risk of falling exhibited by the model. For all simulated conditions, the walker remained orbitally stable, while exhibiting substantial local instability. This was because very small initial perturbations diverged away from the limit cycle, while larger initial perturbations converged toward the limit cycle. These results provide insight into how these different proposed measures of walking stability are related to each other and to risk of falling.",
author = "Su, {Jimmy Li Shin} and Dingwell, {Jonathan B.}",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1115/1.2800760",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "129",
pages = "802--810",
journal = "Journal of Biomechanical Engineering",
issn = "0148-0731",
publisher = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers(ASME)",
number = "6",

}

Dynamic stability of passive dynamic walking on an irregular surface. / Su, Jimmy Li Shin; Dingwell, Jonathan B.

In: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Vol. 129, No. 6, 01.12.2007, p. 802-810.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dynamic stability of passive dynamic walking on an irregular surface

AU - Su, Jimmy Li Shin

AU - Dingwell, Jonathan B.

PY - 2007/12/1

Y1 - 2007/12/1

N2 - Falls that occur during walking are a significant health problem. One of the greatest impediments to solve this problem is that there is no single obviously "correct" way to quantify walking stability. While many people use variability as a proxy for stability, measures of variability do not quantify how the locomotor system responds to perturbations. The purpose of this study was to determine how changes in walking surface variability affect changes in both locomotor variability and stability. We modified an irreducibly simple model of walking to apply random perturbations that simulated walking over an irregular surface. Because the model's global basin of attraction remained fixed, increasing the amplitude of the applied perturbations directly increased the risk of falling in the model. We generated ten simulations of 300 consecutive strides of walking at each of six perturbation amplitudes ranging from zero (i.e., a smooth continuous surface) up to the maximum level the model could tolerate without falling over. Orbital stability defines how a system responds to small (i.e., "local") perturbations from one cycle to the next and was quantified by calculating the maximum Floquet multipliers for the model. Local stability defines how a system responds to similar perturbations in real time and was quantified by calculating short-term and long-term local exponential rates of divergence for the model. As perturbation amplitudes increased, no changes were seen in orbital stability (r2 = 2.43%; p = 0.280) or long-term local instability (r2 = 1.0%; p = 0.441). These measures essentially reflected the fact that the model never actually "fell" during any of our simulations. Conversely, the variability of the walker's kinematics increased exponentially (r2 ≥ 99.6%; p < 0.001) and short-term local instability increased linearly ( r2 = 88.1%; p < 0.001). These measures thus predicted the increased risk of falling exhibited by the model. For all simulated conditions, the walker remained orbitally stable, while exhibiting substantial local instability. This was because very small initial perturbations diverged away from the limit cycle, while larger initial perturbations converged toward the limit cycle. These results provide insight into how these different proposed measures of walking stability are related to each other and to risk of falling.

AB - Falls that occur during walking are a significant health problem. One of the greatest impediments to solve this problem is that there is no single obviously "correct" way to quantify walking stability. While many people use variability as a proxy for stability, measures of variability do not quantify how the locomotor system responds to perturbations. The purpose of this study was to determine how changes in walking surface variability affect changes in both locomotor variability and stability. We modified an irreducibly simple model of walking to apply random perturbations that simulated walking over an irregular surface. Because the model's global basin of attraction remained fixed, increasing the amplitude of the applied perturbations directly increased the risk of falling in the model. We generated ten simulations of 300 consecutive strides of walking at each of six perturbation amplitudes ranging from zero (i.e., a smooth continuous surface) up to the maximum level the model could tolerate without falling over. Orbital stability defines how a system responds to small (i.e., "local") perturbations from one cycle to the next and was quantified by calculating the maximum Floquet multipliers for the model. Local stability defines how a system responds to similar perturbations in real time and was quantified by calculating short-term and long-term local exponential rates of divergence for the model. As perturbation amplitudes increased, no changes were seen in orbital stability (r2 = 2.43%; p = 0.280) or long-term local instability (r2 = 1.0%; p = 0.441). These measures essentially reflected the fact that the model never actually "fell" during any of our simulations. Conversely, the variability of the walker's kinematics increased exponentially (r2 ≥ 99.6%; p < 0.001) and short-term local instability increased linearly ( r2 = 88.1%; p < 0.001). These measures thus predicted the increased risk of falling exhibited by the model. For all simulated conditions, the walker remained orbitally stable, while exhibiting substantial local instability. This was because very small initial perturbations diverged away from the limit cycle, while larger initial perturbations converged toward the limit cycle. These results provide insight into how these different proposed measures of walking stability are related to each other and to risk of falling.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38549102135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38549102135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1115/1.2800760

DO - 10.1115/1.2800760

M3 - Article

C2 - 18067383

AN - SCOPUS:38549102135

VL - 129

SP - 802

EP - 810

JO - Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

JF - Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

SN - 0148-0731

IS - 6

ER -