Early results of tree training system on production of two apple cultivars

R. M. Crassweller, D. E. Smith

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

A field planting of 'Daybreak Fuji'/M.9 NAKB T337 and 'Rubinstar Jonagold'/B.9 was established in 2008 to evaluate 4 training systems: tall spindle (TS), vertical axis (A), tall trellis (TT) and minimally pruned (MP). Training system influenced the number of flowers and flowering density in the second and third growing seasons. At the end of the 6th growing season there was no influence of training system on tree size for 'Jonagold' (JG), while 'Fuji' (DF) TT trees were the smallest of the 4 systems. Total cumulative yield for both cultivars was greatest for trees trained to the MP system. Total cumulative yield for 'Fuji' was lowest for trees trained to the TT system. Cumulative efficiency for 'Jonagold' was significantly better for the trees in the TT and MP than trees in the TS system. There was no significant difference in cumulative efficiency for 'Fuji' trees in any system. Total number of fruit tree-1 was higher for MP trees resulting in lower fruit weight. Labor requirements, man h ha-1, were consistently higher for the TT system largely due to summer pruning; while it was consistently lower for the MP system. Light intensity in the lower canopy in 2012 was not influenced by training system for JG but was for DF.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationInternational Symposium on Physiological Principles and Their Application to Fruit Production
EditorsT. Robinson
PublisherInternational Society for Horticultural Science
Pages127-131
Number of pages5
ISBN (Electronic)9789462611733
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 8 2017

Publication series

NameActa Horticulturae
Volume1177
ISSN (Print)0567-7572

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Horticulture

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Early results of tree training system on production of two apple cultivars'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this