TY - JOUR
T1 - Echocardiography-guided left ventricular lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy in ischemic vs nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients
AU - Daya, Hussein Abu
AU - Alam, Mian Bilal
AU - Adelstein, Evan
AU - Schwartzman, David
AU - Jain, Sandeep
AU - Marek, Josef
AU - Gorcsan, John
AU - Saba, Samir
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported in part by an American Heart Association Grant-in-Aid (Grant 0855526D) to Dr. Saba. Dr. Adelstein receives research grant support from St. Jude Medical. Dr. Schwartzman receives research grant support from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Biosense and is a consultant for Atricure, Avery-Dennison, Biosense, Estech, and Medtronic. Dr. Jain receives research grant support from Medtronic. Dr. Gorcsan receives research grant support from Biotronik, GE, Toshiba, Medtronic, and St. Jude Medical. Dr. Saba receives research grant support from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and St. Jude Medical and is a consultant for Medtronic.
PY - 2014/4
Y1 - 2014/4
N2 - Background: Echocardiography-guided (EG) left ventricular (LV) lead placement at the site of latest mechanical activation improves outcome in heart failure (HF) patients receiving a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)-defibrillator (CRT-D). Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of a strategy of EG LV lead placement in each of ischemic (ICM) vs nonischemic (NICM) cardiomyopathy patients. Methods: Patients enrolled in the Speckle Tracking Assisted Resynchronization Therapy for Electrode Region (STARTER) prospective, randomized trial who were treated with a CRT-D device (108 EG strategy and 75 routine strategy) were followed to the end-points of death, appropriate CRT-D therapy, or HF hospitalization. Results: Of the patients enrolled in STARTER, 115 had ICM and 68 had NICM. Over mean follow-up of 3.7 ± 2.1 years, 62 patients died, 40 received appropriate CRT-D therapy, and 67 had HF hospitalizations. Compared to NICM patients, patients with ICM had worse survival (P = .0003), worse survival free from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy (P = .004), and survival free from HF hospitalization (P = .0001). A strategy of EG LV lead placement improved the outcome of CRT-D therapy-free survival primarily in ICM patients and the outcome of HF hospitalization-free survival in both ICM and NICM patients. Achieving LV resynchronization was most critical in ICM patients in whom arrhythmic and HF outcomes improve with resynchronization to levels comparable to those of NICM patients. Conclusion: A strategy of EG LV lead placement improves HF-free survival equally in ICM and NICM patients and CRT-D therapy-free survival more favorably in ICM patients to levels comparable to those of NICM patients.
AB - Background: Echocardiography-guided (EG) left ventricular (LV) lead placement at the site of latest mechanical activation improves outcome in heart failure (HF) patients receiving a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)-defibrillator (CRT-D). Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of a strategy of EG LV lead placement in each of ischemic (ICM) vs nonischemic (NICM) cardiomyopathy patients. Methods: Patients enrolled in the Speckle Tracking Assisted Resynchronization Therapy for Electrode Region (STARTER) prospective, randomized trial who were treated with a CRT-D device (108 EG strategy and 75 routine strategy) were followed to the end-points of death, appropriate CRT-D therapy, or HF hospitalization. Results: Of the patients enrolled in STARTER, 115 had ICM and 68 had NICM. Over mean follow-up of 3.7 ± 2.1 years, 62 patients died, 40 received appropriate CRT-D therapy, and 67 had HF hospitalizations. Compared to NICM patients, patients with ICM had worse survival (P = .0003), worse survival free from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy (P = .004), and survival free from HF hospitalization (P = .0001). A strategy of EG LV lead placement improved the outcome of CRT-D therapy-free survival primarily in ICM patients and the outcome of HF hospitalization-free survival in both ICM and NICM patients. Achieving LV resynchronization was most critical in ICM patients in whom arrhythmic and HF outcomes improve with resynchronization to levels comparable to those of NICM patients. Conclusion: A strategy of EG LV lead placement improves HF-free survival equally in ICM and NICM patients and CRT-D therapy-free survival more favorably in ICM patients to levels comparable to those of NICM patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897090890&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897090890&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.01.023
DO - 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.01.023
M3 - Article
C2 - 24462657
AN - SCOPUS:84897090890
SN - 1547-5271
VL - 11
SP - 614
EP - 619
JO - Heart Rhythm
JF - Heart Rhythm
IS - 4
ER -