Editorial 6: On persons, things and obligations in semiotic perspective

Jan M. Broekman, Larry Cata Backer

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

It seems rather challenging: persons, things and obligations do not exist in the sense of ˜natural entities. So, how do we come to appreciate their diversification and the order they suggest to represent? A first answer to this question is, that persons, things and obligations are elements embedded in the history of Occidental culture. The period in which they play their role reaches exceptionally wide: from the Twelve Tables erected in the center of Rome around 450 BC to the first Law School in Bologna mid-12th century, and then until our days, when they became incorporated in a variety of national Codes, such as the French or the German. Those concepts fulfilled the task to create an ordernot in society and human relations but in the mass of legal-textual materials that had grown rank in the course of the ages. One concludes, that it is history, which has put emphasis on those three concepts. A characteristic feature in that history was the use of a specific language: Latin survived throughout the ages and was for centuries closely tied to the lawyers profession. The Justinian Code, still in the mind of legal scholars today, reminds the lawyer of this in the US almost forgotten fact. Can one study law without knowledge of Latin?� is a challenging question not only for Civil Law. The Justinian Code plays a star role here. Our contemporary law reverberates the Justinian intuition and treats the three as if they were todays realities. They are realities solely as legal realities, as constructions playing a key role in law and legal discourse.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSigns in Law - A Source Book
Subtitle of host publicationThe Semiotics of Law in Legal Education III
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages159-164
Number of pages6
ISBN (Electronic)9783319098371
ISBN (Print)9783319098364
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

semiotics
obligation
Lawyers
History
lawyer
human being
Law
history
Intuition
human relations
civil law
school law
role play
intuition
diversification
Language
profession
discourse
language
Person

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Broekman, J. M., & Backer, L. C. (2015). Editorial 6: On persons, things and obligations in semiotic perspective. In Signs in Law - A Source Book: The Semiotics of Law in Legal Education III (pp. 159-164). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09837-1_20
Broekman, Jan M. ; Backer, Larry Cata. / Editorial 6 : On persons, things and obligations in semiotic perspective. Signs in Law - A Source Book: The Semiotics of Law in Legal Education III. Springer International Publishing, 2015. pp. 159-164
@inbook{48a8ec40357c42e7820abbb00eed6995,
title = "Editorial 6: On persons, things and obligations in semiotic perspective",
abstract = "It seems rather challenging: persons, things and obligations do not exist in the sense of ˜natural entities. So, how do we come to appreciate their diversification and the order they suggest to represent? A first answer to this question is, that persons, things and obligations are elements embedded in the history of Occidental culture. The period in which they play their role reaches exceptionally wide: from the Twelve Tables erected in the center of Rome around 450 BC to the first Law School in Bologna mid-12th century, and then until our days, when they became incorporated in a variety of national Codes, such as the French or the German. Those concepts fulfilled the task to create an ordernot in society and human relations but in the mass of legal-textual materials that had grown rank in the course of the ages. One concludes, that it is history, which has put emphasis on those three concepts. A characteristic feature in that history was the use of a specific language: Latin survived throughout the ages and was for centuries closely tied to the lawyers profession. The Justinian Code, still in the mind of legal scholars today, reminds the lawyer of this in the US almost forgotten fact. Can one study law without knowledge of Latin?� is a challenging question not only for Civil Law. The Justinian Code plays a star role here. Our contemporary law reverberates the Justinian intuition and treats the three as if they were todays realities. They are realities solely as legal realities, as constructions playing a key role in law and legal discourse.",
author = "Broekman, {Jan M.} and Backer, {Larry Cata}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-09837-1_20",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9783319098364",
pages = "159--164",
booktitle = "Signs in Law - A Source Book",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing",

}

Broekman, JM & Backer, LC 2015, Editorial 6: On persons, things and obligations in semiotic perspective. in Signs in Law - A Source Book: The Semiotics of Law in Legal Education III. Springer International Publishing, pp. 159-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09837-1_20

Editorial 6 : On persons, things and obligations in semiotic perspective. / Broekman, Jan M.; Backer, Larry Cata.

Signs in Law - A Source Book: The Semiotics of Law in Legal Education III. Springer International Publishing, 2015. p. 159-164.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Editorial 6

T2 - On persons, things and obligations in semiotic perspective

AU - Broekman, Jan M.

AU - Backer, Larry Cata

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - It seems rather challenging: persons, things and obligations do not exist in the sense of ˜natural entities. So, how do we come to appreciate their diversification and the order they suggest to represent? A first answer to this question is, that persons, things and obligations are elements embedded in the history of Occidental culture. The period in which they play their role reaches exceptionally wide: from the Twelve Tables erected in the center of Rome around 450 BC to the first Law School in Bologna mid-12th century, and then until our days, when they became incorporated in a variety of national Codes, such as the French or the German. Those concepts fulfilled the task to create an ordernot in society and human relations but in the mass of legal-textual materials that had grown rank in the course of the ages. One concludes, that it is history, which has put emphasis on those three concepts. A characteristic feature in that history was the use of a specific language: Latin survived throughout the ages and was for centuries closely tied to the lawyers profession. The Justinian Code, still in the mind of legal scholars today, reminds the lawyer of this in the US almost forgotten fact. Can one study law without knowledge of Latin?� is a challenging question not only for Civil Law. The Justinian Code plays a star role here. Our contemporary law reverberates the Justinian intuition and treats the three as if they were todays realities. They are realities solely as legal realities, as constructions playing a key role in law and legal discourse.

AB - It seems rather challenging: persons, things and obligations do not exist in the sense of ˜natural entities. So, how do we come to appreciate their diversification and the order they suggest to represent? A first answer to this question is, that persons, things and obligations are elements embedded in the history of Occidental culture. The period in which they play their role reaches exceptionally wide: from the Twelve Tables erected in the center of Rome around 450 BC to the first Law School in Bologna mid-12th century, and then until our days, when they became incorporated in a variety of national Codes, such as the French or the German. Those concepts fulfilled the task to create an ordernot in society and human relations but in the mass of legal-textual materials that had grown rank in the course of the ages. One concludes, that it is history, which has put emphasis on those three concepts. A characteristic feature in that history was the use of a specific language: Latin survived throughout the ages and was for centuries closely tied to the lawyers profession. The Justinian Code, still in the mind of legal scholars today, reminds the lawyer of this in the US almost forgotten fact. Can one study law without knowledge of Latin?� is a challenging question not only for Civil Law. The Justinian Code plays a star role here. Our contemporary law reverberates the Justinian intuition and treats the three as if they were todays realities. They are realities solely as legal realities, as constructions playing a key role in law and legal discourse.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955406985&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955406985&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-09837-1_20

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-09837-1_20

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84955406985

SN - 9783319098364

SP - 159

EP - 164

BT - Signs in Law - A Source Book

PB - Springer International Publishing

ER -

Broekman JM, Backer LC. Editorial 6: On persons, things and obligations in semiotic perspective. In Signs in Law - A Source Book: The Semiotics of Law in Legal Education III. Springer International Publishing. 2015. p. 159-164 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09837-1_20