Effect of bronchial smooth muscle contraction on lung compliance

W. Mitzner, Sandralee Blosser, D. Yager, E. Wagner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

91 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lung compliance is generally considered to represent a blend of surface and tissue forces, and changes in compliance in vivo are commonly used to indicate changes in surface forces. There are, however, theoretical arguments that would allow contraction of airway smooth muscle to affect substantially the elasticity of the lung. In the present study we evaluated the role of conducting airway contraction on lung compliance in vivo by infusing methacholine (MCh) at a constant rate into the bronchial circulation. With a steady-state MCh infusion of 2.4 μg/min into the bronchial perfusate (perfusate concentration = 0.7 μM), there was an approximate doubling of lung resistance and a 50% fall in dynamic compliance. There were also significant decreases in chord compliance measured from the quasi-static pressure-volume curves and in total lung capacity and residual volume. When the same infusion rate was administered into the pulmonary artery, no changes in lung mechanics were observed. These results indicate that the conducting airways may have a major role in regulating lung elasticity. This linkage between airway contraction and lung compliance may account for the common observation that pharmacological challenges given to the lung usually result in similar changes in lung compliance and airway conductance. Our results also suggest the possibility that the lung tissue resistance, which dominates the measurement of lung resistance in many species, might in fact reflect the physical properties of conducting airways.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)158-167
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of applied physiology
Volume72
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 1992

Fingerprint

Lung Compliance
Muscle Contraction
Smooth Muscle
Lung
Compliance
Methacholine Chloride
Elasticity
Total Lung Capacity
Residual Volume
Mechanics
Pulmonary Artery
Pharmacology
Pressure

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Mitzner, W. ; Blosser, Sandralee ; Yager, D. ; Wagner, E. / Effect of bronchial smooth muscle contraction on lung compliance. In: Journal of applied physiology. 1992 ; Vol. 72, No. 1. pp. 158-167.
@article{94e66f4b4c5d4fcf8c89adac1f64a87a,
title = "Effect of bronchial smooth muscle contraction on lung compliance",
abstract = "Lung compliance is generally considered to represent a blend of surface and tissue forces, and changes in compliance in vivo are commonly used to indicate changes in surface forces. There are, however, theoretical arguments that would allow contraction of airway smooth muscle to affect substantially the elasticity of the lung. In the present study we evaluated the role of conducting airway contraction on lung compliance in vivo by infusing methacholine (MCh) at a constant rate into the bronchial circulation. With a steady-state MCh infusion of 2.4 μg/min into the bronchial perfusate (perfusate concentration = 0.7 μM), there was an approximate doubling of lung resistance and a 50{\%} fall in dynamic compliance. There were also significant decreases in chord compliance measured from the quasi-static pressure-volume curves and in total lung capacity and residual volume. When the same infusion rate was administered into the pulmonary artery, no changes in lung mechanics were observed. These results indicate that the conducting airways may have a major role in regulating lung elasticity. This linkage between airway contraction and lung compliance may account for the common observation that pharmacological challenges given to the lung usually result in similar changes in lung compliance and airway conductance. Our results also suggest the possibility that the lung tissue resistance, which dominates the measurement of lung resistance in many species, might in fact reflect the physical properties of conducting airways.",
author = "W. Mitzner and Sandralee Blosser and D. Yager and E. Wagner",
year = "1992",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "158--167",
journal = "Journal of Applied Physiology",
issn = "8750-7587",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "1",

}

Mitzner, W, Blosser, S, Yager, D & Wagner, E 1992, 'Effect of bronchial smooth muscle contraction on lung compliance', Journal of applied physiology, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 158-167.

Effect of bronchial smooth muscle contraction on lung compliance. / Mitzner, W.; Blosser, Sandralee; Yager, D.; Wagner, E.

In: Journal of applied physiology, Vol. 72, No. 1, 01.01.1992, p. 158-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of bronchial smooth muscle contraction on lung compliance

AU - Mitzner, W.

AU - Blosser, Sandralee

AU - Yager, D.

AU - Wagner, E.

PY - 1992/1/1

Y1 - 1992/1/1

N2 - Lung compliance is generally considered to represent a blend of surface and tissue forces, and changes in compliance in vivo are commonly used to indicate changes in surface forces. There are, however, theoretical arguments that would allow contraction of airway smooth muscle to affect substantially the elasticity of the lung. In the present study we evaluated the role of conducting airway contraction on lung compliance in vivo by infusing methacholine (MCh) at a constant rate into the bronchial circulation. With a steady-state MCh infusion of 2.4 μg/min into the bronchial perfusate (perfusate concentration = 0.7 μM), there was an approximate doubling of lung resistance and a 50% fall in dynamic compliance. There were also significant decreases in chord compliance measured from the quasi-static pressure-volume curves and in total lung capacity and residual volume. When the same infusion rate was administered into the pulmonary artery, no changes in lung mechanics were observed. These results indicate that the conducting airways may have a major role in regulating lung elasticity. This linkage between airway contraction and lung compliance may account for the common observation that pharmacological challenges given to the lung usually result in similar changes in lung compliance and airway conductance. Our results also suggest the possibility that the lung tissue resistance, which dominates the measurement of lung resistance in many species, might in fact reflect the physical properties of conducting airways.

AB - Lung compliance is generally considered to represent a blend of surface and tissue forces, and changes in compliance in vivo are commonly used to indicate changes in surface forces. There are, however, theoretical arguments that would allow contraction of airway smooth muscle to affect substantially the elasticity of the lung. In the present study we evaluated the role of conducting airway contraction on lung compliance in vivo by infusing methacholine (MCh) at a constant rate into the bronchial circulation. With a steady-state MCh infusion of 2.4 μg/min into the bronchial perfusate (perfusate concentration = 0.7 μM), there was an approximate doubling of lung resistance and a 50% fall in dynamic compliance. There were also significant decreases in chord compliance measured from the quasi-static pressure-volume curves and in total lung capacity and residual volume. When the same infusion rate was administered into the pulmonary artery, no changes in lung mechanics were observed. These results indicate that the conducting airways may have a major role in regulating lung elasticity. This linkage between airway contraction and lung compliance may account for the common observation that pharmacological challenges given to the lung usually result in similar changes in lung compliance and airway conductance. Our results also suggest the possibility that the lung tissue resistance, which dominates the measurement of lung resistance in many species, might in fact reflect the physical properties of conducting airways.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026593585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026593585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1537710

AN - SCOPUS:0026593585

VL - 72

SP - 158

EP - 167

JO - Journal of Applied Physiology

JF - Journal of Applied Physiology

SN - 8750-7587

IS - 1

ER -