Effect of excitation position of a handheld shaker on fruit removal efficiency and damage in mechanical harvesting of sweet cherry

Jianfeng Zhou, Long He, Qin Zhang, Manoj Karkee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As labour cost keeps rising and labour availability remains increasingly uncertain, growers are seeking mechanical harvesting solutions for fresh-market tree fruit production. To fulfil this need, this research aimed at assessing the effect of excitation position on fruit removal efficiency and fruit damage using a hand-held limb shaker for harvesting sweet cherry. In this study, four excitation positions were selected on each randomly selected limb of "Y" trellis cherry trees. The total number of fruit being removed from five fruiting zones of each limb and those remaining on the tree after harvesting was counted, and harvest-induced damage was assessed. Results showed that fruit removal efficiency from each zone was highly affected by the distance of the zone to the excitation position. The overall fruit removal efficiency was 84% when shaken at the lowest excitation position, and 77%, 51% and 72% respectively as the excitation position moved up the limbs. The fruit damage rates from low to high excitation positions were 20%, 28%, 20% and 23%, which was approximately 10% higher than that of handpicked fruit. No significant difference was found in the fruit damage rate when comparing different excitation positions. It was observed that the fruit removal efficiency may reach up to 97% when the limbs were excited at both the lowest and the highest excitation positions, and adopting such an excitation method could lead to a high fruit removal efficiency with not much increase in fruit damage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)36-44
Number of pages9
JournalBiosystems Engineering
Volume125
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

mechanical harvesting
Prunus avium
Fruits
Fruit
fruit
branches
plant damage
damage
fruits
limb
Extremities
labor
tree fruits
fresh market
fruit growing
effect
removal
fruiting
growers
Personnel

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Food Science
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Soil Science
  • Control and Systems Engineering

Cite this

@article{6853fe6d6a894b33835fc07b069e50a3,
title = "Effect of excitation position of a handheld shaker on fruit removal efficiency and damage in mechanical harvesting of sweet cherry",
abstract = "As labour cost keeps rising and labour availability remains increasingly uncertain, growers are seeking mechanical harvesting solutions for fresh-market tree fruit production. To fulfil this need, this research aimed at assessing the effect of excitation position on fruit removal efficiency and fruit damage using a hand-held limb shaker for harvesting sweet cherry. In this study, four excitation positions were selected on each randomly selected limb of {"}Y{"} trellis cherry trees. The total number of fruit being removed from five fruiting zones of each limb and those remaining on the tree after harvesting was counted, and harvest-induced damage was assessed. Results showed that fruit removal efficiency from each zone was highly affected by the distance of the zone to the excitation position. The overall fruit removal efficiency was 84{\%} when shaken at the lowest excitation position, and 77{\%}, 51{\%} and 72{\%} respectively as the excitation position moved up the limbs. The fruit damage rates from low to high excitation positions were 20{\%}, 28{\%}, 20{\%} and 23{\%}, which was approximately 10{\%} higher than that of handpicked fruit. No significant difference was found in the fruit damage rate when comparing different excitation positions. It was observed that the fruit removal efficiency may reach up to 97{\%} when the limbs were excited at both the lowest and the highest excitation positions, and adopting such an excitation method could lead to a high fruit removal efficiency with not much increase in fruit damage.",
author = "Jianfeng Zhou and Long He and Qin Zhang and Manoj Karkee",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.06.016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "125",
pages = "36--44",
journal = "Biosystems Engineering",
issn = "1537-5110",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

Effect of excitation position of a handheld shaker on fruit removal efficiency and damage in mechanical harvesting of sweet cherry. / Zhou, Jianfeng; He, Long; Zhang, Qin; Karkee, Manoj.

In: Biosystems Engineering, Vol. 125, 01.01.2014, p. 36-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of excitation position of a handheld shaker on fruit removal efficiency and damage in mechanical harvesting of sweet cherry

AU - Zhou, Jianfeng

AU - He, Long

AU - Zhang, Qin

AU - Karkee, Manoj

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - As labour cost keeps rising and labour availability remains increasingly uncertain, growers are seeking mechanical harvesting solutions for fresh-market tree fruit production. To fulfil this need, this research aimed at assessing the effect of excitation position on fruit removal efficiency and fruit damage using a hand-held limb shaker for harvesting sweet cherry. In this study, four excitation positions were selected on each randomly selected limb of "Y" trellis cherry trees. The total number of fruit being removed from five fruiting zones of each limb and those remaining on the tree after harvesting was counted, and harvest-induced damage was assessed. Results showed that fruit removal efficiency from each zone was highly affected by the distance of the zone to the excitation position. The overall fruit removal efficiency was 84% when shaken at the lowest excitation position, and 77%, 51% and 72% respectively as the excitation position moved up the limbs. The fruit damage rates from low to high excitation positions were 20%, 28%, 20% and 23%, which was approximately 10% higher than that of handpicked fruit. No significant difference was found in the fruit damage rate when comparing different excitation positions. It was observed that the fruit removal efficiency may reach up to 97% when the limbs were excited at both the lowest and the highest excitation positions, and adopting such an excitation method could lead to a high fruit removal efficiency with not much increase in fruit damage.

AB - As labour cost keeps rising and labour availability remains increasingly uncertain, growers are seeking mechanical harvesting solutions for fresh-market tree fruit production. To fulfil this need, this research aimed at assessing the effect of excitation position on fruit removal efficiency and fruit damage using a hand-held limb shaker for harvesting sweet cherry. In this study, four excitation positions were selected on each randomly selected limb of "Y" trellis cherry trees. The total number of fruit being removed from five fruiting zones of each limb and those remaining on the tree after harvesting was counted, and harvest-induced damage was assessed. Results showed that fruit removal efficiency from each zone was highly affected by the distance of the zone to the excitation position. The overall fruit removal efficiency was 84% when shaken at the lowest excitation position, and 77%, 51% and 72% respectively as the excitation position moved up the limbs. The fruit damage rates from low to high excitation positions were 20%, 28%, 20% and 23%, which was approximately 10% higher than that of handpicked fruit. No significant difference was found in the fruit damage rate when comparing different excitation positions. It was observed that the fruit removal efficiency may reach up to 97% when the limbs were excited at both the lowest and the highest excitation positions, and adopting such an excitation method could lead to a high fruit removal efficiency with not much increase in fruit damage.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904099322&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904099322&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.06.016

DO - 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.06.016

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84904099322

VL - 125

SP - 36

EP - 44

JO - Biosystems Engineering

JF - Biosystems Engineering

SN - 1537-5110

ER -