Effect of gel damage on fracture fluid cleanup and long-term recovery in tight gas reservoirs

John Yilin Wang, Stephen A. Holditch, Duane A. McVay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One major source of new natural gas supplies for the world will be gas from low-permeability reservoirs. Currently, natural gas from tight sandstones, carbonates, coal seams and shales accounts for over 25% of the annual gas production in the United States. Global production of gas from similar reservoirs world wide will be expected in the next few decades. For such reservoirs, the wells have to be successfully fracture treated to produce at commercial gas flow rates. In many situations, the designed created length was probably achieved, and maybe even the designed propped length was achieved. However, due to insufficient proppant concentration, or insufficient proppant transport, or the use of the wrong propping agent, or a fracture fluid that does not break to a low viscosity fluid, the effective fracture length is significantly less than the designed length and does not provide optimal production results. It is our opinion that insufficient fracture fluid cleanup is the primary cause of poor results when the optimal effective fracture length is not achieved. Fracture fluid cleanup is affected by gel damage, which includes the static yield stress, the flowing yield stress, the amount of polymer residue in the fracture after the fracture closes, and the amount of polymer that forms a filter cake on the walls of the fracture. In addition, there are other issues such as proppant crushing and non-Darcy flow effects that also affect fracture fluid cleanup. In this research, we have used a reservoir simulator to model how polymers in the fracture affect fracture fluid cleanup. We have incorporated mathematical expressions for static yield stress. We have included the effects of proppant crushing, gel residue plugging and the formation of a filter cake on the cleanup behavior and the resulting gas flow rates. With our model, we are able to simulate many of the problems we observe in field data and problems documented in the petroleum literature. Even though real solutions to these problems still remain to be developed, we think we can explain the issues behind most fracture fluid cleanup problems and offer a few ideas on what can be done to solve them.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)108-118
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
Volume9
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2012

Fingerprint

Gels
Recovery
Fluids
Proppants
Yield stress
Crushing
Tight gas
Flow of gases
Natural gas
Polymers
Gases
Flow rate
Low permeability reservoirs
Gas supply
Sandstone
Carbonates
Crude oil
Simulators
Coal
Viscosity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology

Cite this

@article{7a709f0bbfb04875bbbe48316abe74d6,
title = "Effect of gel damage on fracture fluid cleanup and long-term recovery in tight gas reservoirs",
abstract = "One major source of new natural gas supplies for the world will be gas from low-permeability reservoirs. Currently, natural gas from tight sandstones, carbonates, coal seams and shales accounts for over 25{\%} of the annual gas production in the United States. Global production of gas from similar reservoirs world wide will be expected in the next few decades. For such reservoirs, the wells have to be successfully fracture treated to produce at commercial gas flow rates. In many situations, the designed created length was probably achieved, and maybe even the designed propped length was achieved. However, due to insufficient proppant concentration, or insufficient proppant transport, or the use of the wrong propping agent, or a fracture fluid that does not break to a low viscosity fluid, the effective fracture length is significantly less than the designed length and does not provide optimal production results. It is our opinion that insufficient fracture fluid cleanup is the primary cause of poor results when the optimal effective fracture length is not achieved. Fracture fluid cleanup is affected by gel damage, which includes the static yield stress, the flowing yield stress, the amount of polymer residue in the fracture after the fracture closes, and the amount of polymer that forms a filter cake on the walls of the fracture. In addition, there are other issues such as proppant crushing and non-Darcy flow effects that also affect fracture fluid cleanup. In this research, we have used a reservoir simulator to model how polymers in the fracture affect fracture fluid cleanup. We have incorporated mathematical expressions for static yield stress. We have included the effects of proppant crushing, gel residue plugging and the formation of a filter cake on the cleanup behavior and the resulting gas flow rates. With our model, we are able to simulate many of the problems we observe in field data and problems documented in the petroleum literature. Even though real solutions to these problems still remain to be developed, we think we can explain the issues behind most fracture fluid cleanup problems and offer a few ideas on what can be done to solve them.",
author = "Wang, {John Yilin} and Holditch, {Stephen A.} and McVay, {Duane A.}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jngse.2012.05.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "108--118",
journal = "Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering",
issn = "1875-5100",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Effect of gel damage on fracture fluid cleanup and long-term recovery in tight gas reservoirs. / Wang, John Yilin; Holditch, Stephen A.; McVay, Duane A.

In: Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, Vol. 9, 01.11.2012, p. 108-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of gel damage on fracture fluid cleanup and long-term recovery in tight gas reservoirs

AU - Wang, John Yilin

AU - Holditch, Stephen A.

AU - McVay, Duane A.

PY - 2012/11/1

Y1 - 2012/11/1

N2 - One major source of new natural gas supplies for the world will be gas from low-permeability reservoirs. Currently, natural gas from tight sandstones, carbonates, coal seams and shales accounts for over 25% of the annual gas production in the United States. Global production of gas from similar reservoirs world wide will be expected in the next few decades. For such reservoirs, the wells have to be successfully fracture treated to produce at commercial gas flow rates. In many situations, the designed created length was probably achieved, and maybe even the designed propped length was achieved. However, due to insufficient proppant concentration, or insufficient proppant transport, or the use of the wrong propping agent, or a fracture fluid that does not break to a low viscosity fluid, the effective fracture length is significantly less than the designed length and does not provide optimal production results. It is our opinion that insufficient fracture fluid cleanup is the primary cause of poor results when the optimal effective fracture length is not achieved. Fracture fluid cleanup is affected by gel damage, which includes the static yield stress, the flowing yield stress, the amount of polymer residue in the fracture after the fracture closes, and the amount of polymer that forms a filter cake on the walls of the fracture. In addition, there are other issues such as proppant crushing and non-Darcy flow effects that also affect fracture fluid cleanup. In this research, we have used a reservoir simulator to model how polymers in the fracture affect fracture fluid cleanup. We have incorporated mathematical expressions for static yield stress. We have included the effects of proppant crushing, gel residue plugging and the formation of a filter cake on the cleanup behavior and the resulting gas flow rates. With our model, we are able to simulate many of the problems we observe in field data and problems documented in the petroleum literature. Even though real solutions to these problems still remain to be developed, we think we can explain the issues behind most fracture fluid cleanup problems and offer a few ideas on what can be done to solve them.

AB - One major source of new natural gas supplies for the world will be gas from low-permeability reservoirs. Currently, natural gas from tight sandstones, carbonates, coal seams and shales accounts for over 25% of the annual gas production in the United States. Global production of gas from similar reservoirs world wide will be expected in the next few decades. For such reservoirs, the wells have to be successfully fracture treated to produce at commercial gas flow rates. In many situations, the designed created length was probably achieved, and maybe even the designed propped length was achieved. However, due to insufficient proppant concentration, or insufficient proppant transport, or the use of the wrong propping agent, or a fracture fluid that does not break to a low viscosity fluid, the effective fracture length is significantly less than the designed length and does not provide optimal production results. It is our opinion that insufficient fracture fluid cleanup is the primary cause of poor results when the optimal effective fracture length is not achieved. Fracture fluid cleanup is affected by gel damage, which includes the static yield stress, the flowing yield stress, the amount of polymer residue in the fracture after the fracture closes, and the amount of polymer that forms a filter cake on the walls of the fracture. In addition, there are other issues such as proppant crushing and non-Darcy flow effects that also affect fracture fluid cleanup. In this research, we have used a reservoir simulator to model how polymers in the fracture affect fracture fluid cleanup. We have incorporated mathematical expressions for static yield stress. We have included the effects of proppant crushing, gel residue plugging and the formation of a filter cake on the cleanup behavior and the resulting gas flow rates. With our model, we are able to simulate many of the problems we observe in field data and problems documented in the petroleum literature. Even though real solutions to these problems still remain to be developed, we think we can explain the issues behind most fracture fluid cleanup problems and offer a few ideas on what can be done to solve them.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863222040&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863222040&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jngse.2012.05.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jngse.2012.05.007

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 108

EP - 118

JO - Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering

JF - Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering

SN - 1875-5100

ER -