Effect of stimulus number, target-to-distractor ratio, and motor speed on visual spatial search quality following traumatic brain injury

David S. Geldmacher, Everett C. Hills

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The object of this study was to investigate stimulus effects and motor limitations on visuospatial performance after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Previous findings have not fully explained the basis of attentional impairments after TBI. There has been little study of the spatial aspects of attention and information processing in this group. We studied 20 patients after severe TBI and 21 healthy controls. Four random-array letter cancellation tasks, varying in number of stimuli (50 and 100) and target-to-distractor ratio (1:4 and 1:9) were employed. Performance was calculated from the number and proportion of cancelled targets, as well as time to completion. TBI subjects were slower on finger tapping and achieved lower cancellation performance scores. Both TBI subjects and controls performed better on tasks with target-to-distractor (T/D) ratios of 1:4 than on those with 1:9. There was no effect of stimulus number. We conclude that there are both quantitative (speed) and qualitative contributors to impaired visuospatial ability following TBI. Motor impairments may slow the overall cancellation performance, but the differential effect of T/D ratio in the two populations suggests that TBI impairs quality of research. Accounting for both speed and accuracy suggests increased utility for the cancellation paradigm in clinical and research assessment of visuospatial attention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)59-66
Number of pages8
JournalBrain Injury
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1997

Fingerprint

Distractor
Traumatic Brain Injury
Stimulus
Automatic Data Processing
Research
Fingers
Population
Impairment
Letters
Information Processing
Finger Tapping
Research Assessment
Proportion
Completion
Paradigm

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neuroscience (miscellaneous)
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

@article{ce3cc1a6551c44a6b36a29fcf43f3b73,
title = "Effect of stimulus number, target-to-distractor ratio, and motor speed on visual spatial search quality following traumatic brain injury",
abstract = "The object of this study was to investigate stimulus effects and motor limitations on visuospatial performance after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Previous findings have not fully explained the basis of attentional impairments after TBI. There has been little study of the spatial aspects of attention and information processing in this group. We studied 20 patients after severe TBI and 21 healthy controls. Four random-array letter cancellation tasks, varying in number of stimuli (50 and 100) and target-to-distractor ratio (1:4 and 1:9) were employed. Performance was calculated from the number and proportion of cancelled targets, as well as time to completion. TBI subjects were slower on finger tapping and achieved lower cancellation performance scores. Both TBI subjects and controls performed better on tasks with target-to-distractor (T/D) ratios of 1:4 than on those with 1:9. There was no effect of stimulus number. We conclude that there are both quantitative (speed) and qualitative contributors to impaired visuospatial ability following TBI. Motor impairments may slow the overall cancellation performance, but the differential effect of T/D ratio in the two populations suggests that TBI impairs quality of research. Accounting for both speed and accuracy suggests increased utility for the cancellation paradigm in clinical and research assessment of visuospatial attention.",
author = "Geldmacher, {David S.} and Hills, {Everett C.}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1080/026990597123818",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "59--66",
journal = "Brain Injury",
issn = "0269-9052",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "1",

}

Effect of stimulus number, target-to-distractor ratio, and motor speed on visual spatial search quality following traumatic brain injury. / Geldmacher, David S.; Hills, Everett C.

In: Brain Injury, Vol. 11, No. 1, 01.1997, p. 59-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of stimulus number, target-to-distractor ratio, and motor speed on visual spatial search quality following traumatic brain injury

AU - Geldmacher, David S.

AU - Hills, Everett C.

PY - 1997/1

Y1 - 1997/1

N2 - The object of this study was to investigate stimulus effects and motor limitations on visuospatial performance after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Previous findings have not fully explained the basis of attentional impairments after TBI. There has been little study of the spatial aspects of attention and information processing in this group. We studied 20 patients after severe TBI and 21 healthy controls. Four random-array letter cancellation tasks, varying in number of stimuli (50 and 100) and target-to-distractor ratio (1:4 and 1:9) were employed. Performance was calculated from the number and proportion of cancelled targets, as well as time to completion. TBI subjects were slower on finger tapping and achieved lower cancellation performance scores. Both TBI subjects and controls performed better on tasks with target-to-distractor (T/D) ratios of 1:4 than on those with 1:9. There was no effect of stimulus number. We conclude that there are both quantitative (speed) and qualitative contributors to impaired visuospatial ability following TBI. Motor impairments may slow the overall cancellation performance, but the differential effect of T/D ratio in the two populations suggests that TBI impairs quality of research. Accounting for both speed and accuracy suggests increased utility for the cancellation paradigm in clinical and research assessment of visuospatial attention.

AB - The object of this study was to investigate stimulus effects and motor limitations on visuospatial performance after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Previous findings have not fully explained the basis of attentional impairments after TBI. There has been little study of the spatial aspects of attention and information processing in this group. We studied 20 patients after severe TBI and 21 healthy controls. Four random-array letter cancellation tasks, varying in number of stimuli (50 and 100) and target-to-distractor ratio (1:4 and 1:9) were employed. Performance was calculated from the number and proportion of cancelled targets, as well as time to completion. TBI subjects were slower on finger tapping and achieved lower cancellation performance scores. Both TBI subjects and controls performed better on tasks with target-to-distractor (T/D) ratios of 1:4 than on those with 1:9. There was no effect of stimulus number. We conclude that there are both quantitative (speed) and qualitative contributors to impaired visuospatial ability following TBI. Motor impairments may slow the overall cancellation performance, but the differential effect of T/D ratio in the two populations suggests that TBI impairs quality of research. Accounting for both speed and accuracy suggests increased utility for the cancellation paradigm in clinical and research assessment of visuospatial attention.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031018123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031018123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/026990597123818

DO - 10.1080/026990597123818

M3 - Article

C2 - 9012552

AN - SCOPUS:0031018123

VL - 11

SP - 59

EP - 66

JO - Brain Injury

JF - Brain Injury

SN - 0269-9052

IS - 1

ER -