Effectiveness of mental health courts in reducing recidivism: A meta-analysis

Evan M. Lowder, Candalyn B. Rade, Sarah L. Desmarais

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Mental health courts (MHCs) were developed to address the overrepresentation of adults with mental illnesses in the U.S. criminal justice system through diversion into community-based treatment. Research on MHCs has proliferated in recent years, and there is a need to synthesize contemporary literature on MHC effectiveness. The authors conducted a meta-analytic investigation of the effect on criminal recidivism of adult MHC participation compared with traditional criminal processing. Methods: Systematic search of three databases yielded 17 studies (N=16,129) published between 2004 and 2015. Study characteristics and potential moderators (that is, publication type, recidivism outcome, and length and timing of followup) were independently extracted by two of four raters for each study. Two raters coded each study for quality and extracted between-group effect sizes for measures of recidivism (that is, arrest, charge, conviction, and jail time; k=25). Results were synthesized by using random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity and publication bias were also assessed. Results: Results showed a small effect of MHC participation on recidivism (d=–.20) relative to traditional criminal processing. MHCs were most effective with respect to jail time and charge outcomes compared with arrest and conviction, in studies measuring recidivism after MHC exit rather than at entry, and in lower-quality studies compared with moderate- and high-quality studies. Results showed significant heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies (I 2 =73.33) but little evidence of publication bias. Conclusions: Overall, a small effect of MHC participation on recidivism was noted, compared with traditional criminal processing. Findings suggest the need for research to identify additional sources of variability in the effectiveness of MHCs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)15-22
Number of pages8
JournalPsychiatric Services
Volume69
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Mental Health
Publication Bias
Literature
Criminal Law
Research
Publications
Databases

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Lowder, Evan M. ; Rade, Candalyn B. ; Desmarais, Sarah L. / Effectiveness of mental health courts in reducing recidivism : A meta-analysis. In: Psychiatric Services. 2018 ; Vol. 69, No. 1. pp. 15-22.
@article{44b02b57400643d5a7b9feb3e4841a4b,
title = "Effectiveness of mental health courts in reducing recidivism: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "Objective: Mental health courts (MHCs) were developed to address the overrepresentation of adults with mental illnesses in the U.S. criminal justice system through diversion into community-based treatment. Research on MHCs has proliferated in recent years, and there is a need to synthesize contemporary literature on MHC effectiveness. The authors conducted a meta-analytic investigation of the effect on criminal recidivism of adult MHC participation compared with traditional criminal processing. Methods: Systematic search of three databases yielded 17 studies (N=16,129) published between 2004 and 2015. Study characteristics and potential moderators (that is, publication type, recidivism outcome, and length and timing of followup) were independently extracted by two of four raters for each study. Two raters coded each study for quality and extracted between-group effect sizes for measures of recidivism (that is, arrest, charge, conviction, and jail time; k=25). Results were synthesized by using random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity and publication bias were also assessed. Results: Results showed a small effect of MHC participation on recidivism (d=–.20) relative to traditional criminal processing. MHCs were most effective with respect to jail time and charge outcomes compared with arrest and conviction, in studies measuring recidivism after MHC exit rather than at entry, and in lower-quality studies compared with moderate- and high-quality studies. Results showed significant heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies (I 2 =73.33) but little evidence of publication bias. Conclusions: Overall, a small effect of MHC participation on recidivism was noted, compared with traditional criminal processing. Findings suggest the need for research to identify additional sources of variability in the effectiveness of MHCs.",
author = "Lowder, {Evan M.} and Rade, {Candalyn B.} and Desmarais, {Sarah L.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1176/appi.ps.201700107",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "15--22",
journal = "Psychiatric Services",
issn = "1075-2730",
publisher = "American Psychiatric Association",
number = "1",

}

Effectiveness of mental health courts in reducing recidivism : A meta-analysis. / Lowder, Evan M.; Rade, Candalyn B.; Desmarais, Sarah L.

In: Psychiatric Services, Vol. 69, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 15-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of mental health courts in reducing recidivism

T2 - A meta-analysis

AU - Lowder, Evan M.

AU - Rade, Candalyn B.

AU - Desmarais, Sarah L.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objective: Mental health courts (MHCs) were developed to address the overrepresentation of adults with mental illnesses in the U.S. criminal justice system through diversion into community-based treatment. Research on MHCs has proliferated in recent years, and there is a need to synthesize contemporary literature on MHC effectiveness. The authors conducted a meta-analytic investigation of the effect on criminal recidivism of adult MHC participation compared with traditional criminal processing. Methods: Systematic search of three databases yielded 17 studies (N=16,129) published between 2004 and 2015. Study characteristics and potential moderators (that is, publication type, recidivism outcome, and length and timing of followup) were independently extracted by two of four raters for each study. Two raters coded each study for quality and extracted between-group effect sizes for measures of recidivism (that is, arrest, charge, conviction, and jail time; k=25). Results were synthesized by using random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity and publication bias were also assessed. Results: Results showed a small effect of MHC participation on recidivism (d=–.20) relative to traditional criminal processing. MHCs were most effective with respect to jail time and charge outcomes compared with arrest and conviction, in studies measuring recidivism after MHC exit rather than at entry, and in lower-quality studies compared with moderate- and high-quality studies. Results showed significant heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies (I 2 =73.33) but little evidence of publication bias. Conclusions: Overall, a small effect of MHC participation on recidivism was noted, compared with traditional criminal processing. Findings suggest the need for research to identify additional sources of variability in the effectiveness of MHCs.

AB - Objective: Mental health courts (MHCs) were developed to address the overrepresentation of adults with mental illnesses in the U.S. criminal justice system through diversion into community-based treatment. Research on MHCs has proliferated in recent years, and there is a need to synthesize contemporary literature on MHC effectiveness. The authors conducted a meta-analytic investigation of the effect on criminal recidivism of adult MHC participation compared with traditional criminal processing. Methods: Systematic search of three databases yielded 17 studies (N=16,129) published between 2004 and 2015. Study characteristics and potential moderators (that is, publication type, recidivism outcome, and length and timing of followup) were independently extracted by two of four raters for each study. Two raters coded each study for quality and extracted between-group effect sizes for measures of recidivism (that is, arrest, charge, conviction, and jail time; k=25). Results were synthesized by using random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity and publication bias were also assessed. Results: Results showed a small effect of MHC participation on recidivism (d=–.20) relative to traditional criminal processing. MHCs were most effective with respect to jail time and charge outcomes compared with arrest and conviction, in studies measuring recidivism after MHC exit rather than at entry, and in lower-quality studies compared with moderate- and high-quality studies. Results showed significant heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies (I 2 =73.33) but little evidence of publication bias. Conclusions: Overall, a small effect of MHC participation on recidivism was noted, compared with traditional criminal processing. Findings suggest the need for research to identify additional sources of variability in the effectiveness of MHCs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039967118&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85039967118&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1176/appi.ps.201700107

DO - 10.1176/appi.ps.201700107

M3 - Article

C2 - 28806894

AN - SCOPUS:85039967118

VL - 69

SP - 15

EP - 22

JO - Psychiatric Services

JF - Psychiatric Services

SN - 1075-2730

IS - 1

ER -