Effectiveness of Practices to Support Appropriate Laboratory Test Utilization

Matthew Rubinstein, Robert Hirsch, Kakali Bandyopadhyay, Bereneice Madison, Thomas Taylor, Anne Ranne, Millie Linville, Keri Donaldson, Felicitas Lacbawan, Nancy Cornish

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of practices used to support appropriate clinical laboratory test utilization. Methods This review followed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Laboratory Medicine Best Practices A6 cycle method. Eligible studies assessed one of the following practices for effect on outcomes relating to over- or underutilization: computerized provider order entry (CPOE), clinical decision support systems/tools (CDSS/CDST), education, feedback, test review, reflex testing, laboratory test utilization (LTU) teams, and any combination of these practices. Eligible outcomes included intermediate, systems outcomes (eg, number of tests ordered/performed and cost of tests), as well as patient-related outcomes (eg, length of hospital stay, readmission rates, morbidity, and mortality). Results Eighty-three studies met inclusion criteria. Fifty-one of these studies could be meta-analyzed. Strength of evidence ratings for each practice ranged from high to insufficient. Conclusion Practice recommendations are made for CPOE (specifically, modifications to existing CPOE), reflex testing, and combined practices. No recommendation for or against could be made for CDSS/CDST, education, feedback, test review, and LTU. Findings from this review serve to inform guidance for future studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)197-221
Number of pages25
JournalAmerican journal of clinical pathology
Volume149
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 17 2018

Fingerprint

Medical Order Entry Systems
Reflex
Length of Stay
Clinical Decision Support Systems
Education
Patient Readmission
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)
Practice Guidelines
Medicine
Morbidity
Costs and Cost Analysis
Mortality

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Rubinstein, M., Hirsch, R., Bandyopadhyay, K., Madison, B., Taylor, T., Ranne, A., ... Cornish, N. (2018). Effectiveness of Practices to Support Appropriate Laboratory Test Utilization. American journal of clinical pathology, 149(3), 197-221. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqx147
Rubinstein, Matthew ; Hirsch, Robert ; Bandyopadhyay, Kakali ; Madison, Bereneice ; Taylor, Thomas ; Ranne, Anne ; Linville, Millie ; Donaldson, Keri ; Lacbawan, Felicitas ; Cornish, Nancy. / Effectiveness of Practices to Support Appropriate Laboratory Test Utilization. In: American journal of clinical pathology. 2018 ; Vol. 149, No. 3. pp. 197-221.
@article{abc82c4de66d4d56864ff5a22bfb323d,
title = "Effectiveness of Practices to Support Appropriate Laboratory Test Utilization",
abstract = "Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of practices used to support appropriate clinical laboratory test utilization. Methods This review followed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Laboratory Medicine Best Practices A6 cycle method. Eligible studies assessed one of the following practices for effect on outcomes relating to over- or underutilization: computerized provider order entry (CPOE), clinical decision support systems/tools (CDSS/CDST), education, feedback, test review, reflex testing, laboratory test utilization (LTU) teams, and any combination of these practices. Eligible outcomes included intermediate, systems outcomes (eg, number of tests ordered/performed and cost of tests), as well as patient-related outcomes (eg, length of hospital stay, readmission rates, morbidity, and mortality). Results Eighty-three studies met inclusion criteria. Fifty-one of these studies could be meta-analyzed. Strength of evidence ratings for each practice ranged from high to insufficient. Conclusion Practice recommendations are made for CPOE (specifically, modifications to existing CPOE), reflex testing, and combined practices. No recommendation for or against could be made for CDSS/CDST, education, feedback, test review, and LTU. Findings from this review serve to inform guidance for future studies.",
author = "Matthew Rubinstein and Robert Hirsch and Kakali Bandyopadhyay and Bereneice Madison and Thomas Taylor and Anne Ranne and Millie Linville and Keri Donaldson and Felicitas Lacbawan and Nancy Cornish",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1093/ajcp/aqx147",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "149",
pages = "197--221",
journal = "American Journal of Clinical Pathology",
issn = "0002-9173",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Pathologists",
number = "3",

}

Rubinstein, M, Hirsch, R, Bandyopadhyay, K, Madison, B, Taylor, T, Ranne, A, Linville, M, Donaldson, K, Lacbawan, F & Cornish, N 2018, 'Effectiveness of Practices to Support Appropriate Laboratory Test Utilization', American journal of clinical pathology, vol. 149, no. 3, pp. 197-221. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqx147

Effectiveness of Practices to Support Appropriate Laboratory Test Utilization. / Rubinstein, Matthew; Hirsch, Robert; Bandyopadhyay, Kakali; Madison, Bereneice; Taylor, Thomas; Ranne, Anne; Linville, Millie; Donaldson, Keri; Lacbawan, Felicitas; Cornish, Nancy.

In: American journal of clinical pathology, Vol. 149, No. 3, 17.02.2018, p. 197-221.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of Practices to Support Appropriate Laboratory Test Utilization

AU - Rubinstein, Matthew

AU - Hirsch, Robert

AU - Bandyopadhyay, Kakali

AU - Madison, Bereneice

AU - Taylor, Thomas

AU - Ranne, Anne

AU - Linville, Millie

AU - Donaldson, Keri

AU - Lacbawan, Felicitas

AU - Cornish, Nancy

PY - 2018/2/17

Y1 - 2018/2/17

N2 - Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of practices used to support appropriate clinical laboratory test utilization. Methods This review followed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Laboratory Medicine Best Practices A6 cycle method. Eligible studies assessed one of the following practices for effect on outcomes relating to over- or underutilization: computerized provider order entry (CPOE), clinical decision support systems/tools (CDSS/CDST), education, feedback, test review, reflex testing, laboratory test utilization (LTU) teams, and any combination of these practices. Eligible outcomes included intermediate, systems outcomes (eg, number of tests ordered/performed and cost of tests), as well as patient-related outcomes (eg, length of hospital stay, readmission rates, morbidity, and mortality). Results Eighty-three studies met inclusion criteria. Fifty-one of these studies could be meta-analyzed. Strength of evidence ratings for each practice ranged from high to insufficient. Conclusion Practice recommendations are made for CPOE (specifically, modifications to existing CPOE), reflex testing, and combined practices. No recommendation for or against could be made for CDSS/CDST, education, feedback, test review, and LTU. Findings from this review serve to inform guidance for future studies.

AB - Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of practices used to support appropriate clinical laboratory test utilization. Methods This review followed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Laboratory Medicine Best Practices A6 cycle method. Eligible studies assessed one of the following practices for effect on outcomes relating to over- or underutilization: computerized provider order entry (CPOE), clinical decision support systems/tools (CDSS/CDST), education, feedback, test review, reflex testing, laboratory test utilization (LTU) teams, and any combination of these practices. Eligible outcomes included intermediate, systems outcomes (eg, number of tests ordered/performed and cost of tests), as well as patient-related outcomes (eg, length of hospital stay, readmission rates, morbidity, and mortality). Results Eighty-three studies met inclusion criteria. Fifty-one of these studies could be meta-analyzed. Strength of evidence ratings for each practice ranged from high to insufficient. Conclusion Practice recommendations are made for CPOE (specifically, modifications to existing CPOE), reflex testing, and combined practices. No recommendation for or against could be made for CDSS/CDST, education, feedback, test review, and LTU. Findings from this review serve to inform guidance for future studies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042530707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042530707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ajcp/aqx147

DO - 10.1093/ajcp/aqx147

M3 - Review article

VL - 149

SP - 197

EP - 221

JO - American Journal of Clinical Pathology

JF - American Journal of Clinical Pathology

SN - 0002-9173

IS - 3

ER -

Rubinstein M, Hirsch R, Bandyopadhyay K, Madison B, Taylor T, Ranne A et al. Effectiveness of Practices to Support Appropriate Laboratory Test Utilization. American journal of clinical pathology. 2018 Feb 17;149(3):197-221. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqx147