TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of cognitive load on neural and behavioral responses to smoking-cue distractors
AU - MacLean, R. Ross
AU - Nichols, Travis T.
AU - LeBreton, James M.
AU - Wilson, Stephen J.
N1 - Funding Information:
R.R.M. is currently supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Academic Affiliations Advanced Fellowship Program in Mental Illness Research and Treatment; the Department of Veterans Affairs New England Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC); and the VA Connecticut Healthcare System. S.J.W.’s research is supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21DA037149, R03DA035929) and the National Cancer Institute (R21CA190093). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the National Institutes of Health. We thank the students and staff of the Penn State Addiction, Smoking, and Health Laboratory for their assistance with data collection.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the US).
PY - 2016/8/1
Y1 - 2016/8/1
N2 - Smoking cessation failures are frequently thought to reflect poor top-down regulatory control over behavior. Previous studies have suggested that smoking cues occupy limited working memory resources, an effect that may contribute to difficulty achieving abstinence. Few studies have evaluated the effects of cognitive load on the ability to actively maintain information in the face of distracting smoking cues. For the present study, we adapted an fMRI probed recall task under low and high cognitive load with three distractor conditions: control, neutral images, or smoking-related images. Consistent with a limited-resource model of cue reactivity, we predicted that the performance of daily smokers (n = 17) would be most impaired when high load was paired with smoking distractors. The results demonstrated a main effect of load, with decreased accuracy under high, as compared to low, cognitive load. Surprisingly, an interaction revealed that the effect of load was weakest in the smoking cue distractor condition. Along with this behavioral effect, we observed significantly greater activation of the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) in the low-load condition than in the high-load condition for trials containing smoking cue distractors. Furthermore, load-related changes in rIFG activation partially mediated the effects of load on task accuracy in the smoking-cue distractor condition. These findings are discussed in the context of prevailing cognitive and cue reactivity theories. These results suggest that high cognitive load does not necessarily make smokers more susceptible to interference from smoking-related stimuli, and that elevated load may even have a buffering effect in the presence of smoking cues under certain conditions.
AB - Smoking cessation failures are frequently thought to reflect poor top-down regulatory control over behavior. Previous studies have suggested that smoking cues occupy limited working memory resources, an effect that may contribute to difficulty achieving abstinence. Few studies have evaluated the effects of cognitive load on the ability to actively maintain information in the face of distracting smoking cues. For the present study, we adapted an fMRI probed recall task under low and high cognitive load with three distractor conditions: control, neutral images, or smoking-related images. Consistent with a limited-resource model of cue reactivity, we predicted that the performance of daily smokers (n = 17) would be most impaired when high load was paired with smoking distractors. The results demonstrated a main effect of load, with decreased accuracy under high, as compared to low, cognitive load. Surprisingly, an interaction revealed that the effect of load was weakest in the smoking cue distractor condition. Along with this behavioral effect, we observed significantly greater activation of the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) in the low-load condition than in the high-load condition for trials containing smoking cue distractors. Furthermore, load-related changes in rIFG activation partially mediated the effects of load on task accuracy in the smoking-cue distractor condition. These findings are discussed in the context of prevailing cognitive and cue reactivity theories. These results suggest that high cognitive load does not necessarily make smokers more susceptible to interference from smoking-related stimuli, and that elevated load may even have a buffering effect in the presence of smoking cues under certain conditions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961674980&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961674980&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3758/s13415-016-0416-5
DO - 10.3758/s13415-016-0416-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 27012714
AN - SCOPUS:84961674980
SN - 1530-7026
VL - 16
SP - 588
EP - 600
JO - Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience
JF - Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience
IS - 4
ER -