EFFECTS OF EXPERIENCE ON LEARNING, USING, AND EVALUATING A TEXT EDITOR.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Routine users of a text editor at a research lab were surveyed about their experiences in learning and using the editor and were asked to describe their likes, dislikes, and suggestions for additions to the system. The 121 users responding to the survey represented samples from three user classes - secretaries, nonprogrammer research members, and programmers - and they varied considerably in their experience both with the editor in question and with other text editors. Experience with the system itself predicted a number of survey measures, such as the customization of programmable function keys, the extension of the editor through macros, and the number and type of additions suggested. However, strong effects of both work type and prior experience with other editors were observed, even for users who were very experienced with the system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)463-475
Number of pages13
JournalHuman Factors
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1984

Fingerprint

File editors
editor
Learning
Research
learning
Macros
experience
Surveys and Questionnaires

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Applied Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

@article{bdbd05cb605c407198b3cb102fd48e3c,
title = "EFFECTS OF EXPERIENCE ON LEARNING, USING, AND EVALUATING A TEXT EDITOR.",
abstract = "Routine users of a text editor at a research lab were surveyed about their experiences in learning and using the editor and were asked to describe their likes, dislikes, and suggestions for additions to the system. The 121 users responding to the survey represented samples from three user classes - secretaries, nonprogrammer research members, and programmers - and they varied considerably in their experience both with the editor in question and with other text editors. Experience with the system itself predicted a number of survey measures, such as the customization of programmable function keys, the extension of the editor through macros, and the number and type of additions suggested. However, strong effects of both work type and prior experience with other editors were observed, even for users who were very experienced with the system.",
author = "Rosson, {Mary Beth}",
year = "1984",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/001872088402600409",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "463--475",
journal = "Human Factors",
issn = "0018-7208",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

EFFECTS OF EXPERIENCE ON LEARNING, USING, AND EVALUATING A TEXT EDITOR. / Rosson, Mary Beth.

In: Human Factors, Vol. 26, No. 4, 01.01.1984, p. 463-475.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - EFFECTS OF EXPERIENCE ON LEARNING, USING, AND EVALUATING A TEXT EDITOR.

AU - Rosson, Mary Beth

PY - 1984/1/1

Y1 - 1984/1/1

N2 - Routine users of a text editor at a research lab were surveyed about their experiences in learning and using the editor and were asked to describe their likes, dislikes, and suggestions for additions to the system. The 121 users responding to the survey represented samples from three user classes - secretaries, nonprogrammer research members, and programmers - and they varied considerably in their experience both with the editor in question and with other text editors. Experience with the system itself predicted a number of survey measures, such as the customization of programmable function keys, the extension of the editor through macros, and the number and type of additions suggested. However, strong effects of both work type and prior experience with other editors were observed, even for users who were very experienced with the system.

AB - Routine users of a text editor at a research lab were surveyed about their experiences in learning and using the editor and were asked to describe their likes, dislikes, and suggestions for additions to the system. The 121 users responding to the survey represented samples from three user classes - secretaries, nonprogrammer research members, and programmers - and they varied considerably in their experience both with the editor in question and with other text editors. Experience with the system itself predicted a number of survey measures, such as the customization of programmable function keys, the extension of the editor through macros, and the number and type of additions suggested. However, strong effects of both work type and prior experience with other editors were observed, even for users who were very experienced with the system.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021473013&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021473013&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/001872088402600409

DO - 10.1177/001872088402600409

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 463

EP - 475

JO - Human Factors

JF - Human Factors

SN - 0018-7208

IS - 4

ER -