TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of integrated conservation-development projects on unauthorized resource use in Volcanoes National Park, Rwanda
T2 - A mixed-methods spatio-temporal approach
AU - Bernhard, Katie P.
AU - Smith, Thomas E.L.
AU - Sabuhoro, Edwin
AU - Nyandwi, Elias
AU - Munanura, Ian E.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the University of Rwanda, Rwanda National Council for Science and Technology, Rwanda Development Board, the wardens of Volcanoes National Park, and the International Gorilla Conservation Programme. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, or commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International.
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - This study supplements spatial panel econometrics techniques with qualitative GIS to analyse spatio-temporal changes in the distribution of integrated conservation-development projects relative to poaching activity and unauthorized resource use in Volcanoes National Park, Rwanda. Cluster and spatial regression analyses were performed on data from ranger monitoring containing > 35,000 combined observations of illegal activities in Volcanoes National Park, against tourism revenue sharing and conservation NGO funding data for 2006-2015. Results were enriched with qualitative GIS analysis from key informant interviews. We found a statistically significant negative linear effect of overall integrated conservation-development investments on unauthorized resource use in Volcanoes National Park. However, individually, funding from Rwanda's tourism revenue sharing policy did not have an effect in contrast to the significant negative effect of conservation NGO funding. In another contrast between NGO funding and tourism revenue sharing funding, spatial analysis revealed significant gaps in revenue sharing funding relative to the hotspots of illegal activities, but these gaps were not present for NGO funding. Insight from qualitative GIS analysis suggests that incongruity in prioritization by decision makers at least partly explains the differences between the effects of revenue sharing and conservation NGO investment. Although the overall results are encouraging for integrated conservation-development projects, we recommend increased spatial alignment of project funding with clusters of illegal activities, which can make investment decision-making more data-driven and projects more effective for conservation.
AB - This study supplements spatial panel econometrics techniques with qualitative GIS to analyse spatio-temporal changes in the distribution of integrated conservation-development projects relative to poaching activity and unauthorized resource use in Volcanoes National Park, Rwanda. Cluster and spatial regression analyses were performed on data from ranger monitoring containing > 35,000 combined observations of illegal activities in Volcanoes National Park, against tourism revenue sharing and conservation NGO funding data for 2006-2015. Results were enriched with qualitative GIS analysis from key informant interviews. We found a statistically significant negative linear effect of overall integrated conservation-development investments on unauthorized resource use in Volcanoes National Park. However, individually, funding from Rwanda's tourism revenue sharing policy did not have an effect in contrast to the significant negative effect of conservation NGO funding. In another contrast between NGO funding and tourism revenue sharing funding, spatial analysis revealed significant gaps in revenue sharing funding relative to the hotspots of illegal activities, but these gaps were not present for NGO funding. Insight from qualitative GIS analysis suggests that incongruity in prioritization by decision makers at least partly explains the differences between the effects of revenue sharing and conservation NGO investment. Although the overall results are encouraging for integrated conservation-development projects, we recommend increased spatial alignment of project funding with clusters of illegal activities, which can make investment decision-making more data-driven and projects more effective for conservation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85095441688&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85095441688&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0030605319000735
DO - 10.1017/S0030605319000735
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85095441688
SN - 0030-6053
VL - 55
SP - 613
EP - 624
JO - Oryx
JF - Oryx
IS - 4
ER -