Effects of landscape patterns on biotic communities

Joseph N. Miller, Robert P. Brooks, Mary Jo Croonquist

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

86 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A comparative evaluation was performed using descriptors of landscape and land cover patterns as to how they relate to varying levels of anthropogenic disturbance and the structure of biotic communities. A spatial analysis program (a modified version of SPAN) was used to compute measures of land cover diversity, dominance, contagion, scaled dominance and contagion, fractal dimension of land cover patches, mean forest-wetland patch size, amount of forest edge, clustering of selected forest types, and the largest cover patches within two 100-km2 watersheds of the Ridge and Valley province of central Pennsylvania. Landscape pattern analysis was conducted on a subwatershed basis, emphasizing different levels of residential-agricultural versus forest land cover, the major difference between the two watersheds. Bird and vascular plant guilds were chosen to represent the overall biotic community. The general descriptors of diversity, contagion, mean forest-wetland patch size, proportion of forest cover, and the amount of forest edge were most effective in reflecting the disturbance levels within the watersheds and changes in guild composition for both birds and plants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)137-153
Number of pages17
JournalLandscape Ecology
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997

Fingerprint

land cover
forest edge
patch size
watershed
guild
community
wetland
bird
disturbance
forest cover
vascular plant
spatial analysis
valley
effect
evaluation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Miller, J. N., Brooks, R. P., & Croonquist, M. J. (1997). Effects of landscape patterns on biotic communities. Landscape Ecology, 12(3), 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007970716227
Miller, Joseph N. ; Brooks, Robert P. ; Croonquist, Mary Jo. / Effects of landscape patterns on biotic communities. In: Landscape Ecology. 1997 ; Vol. 12, No. 3. pp. 137-153.
@article{44d7bdd6ee80487f8286f0608f5b3e91,
title = "Effects of landscape patterns on biotic communities",
abstract = "A comparative evaluation was performed using descriptors of landscape and land cover patterns as to how they relate to varying levels of anthropogenic disturbance and the structure of biotic communities. A spatial analysis program (a modified version of SPAN) was used to compute measures of land cover diversity, dominance, contagion, scaled dominance and contagion, fractal dimension of land cover patches, mean forest-wetland patch size, amount of forest edge, clustering of selected forest types, and the largest cover patches within two 100-km2 watersheds of the Ridge and Valley province of central Pennsylvania. Landscape pattern analysis was conducted on a subwatershed basis, emphasizing different levels of residential-agricultural versus forest land cover, the major difference between the two watersheds. Bird and vascular plant guilds were chosen to represent the overall biotic community. The general descriptors of diversity, contagion, mean forest-wetland patch size, proportion of forest cover, and the amount of forest edge were most effective in reflecting the disturbance levels within the watersheds and changes in guild composition for both birds and plants.",
author = "Miller, {Joseph N.} and Brooks, {Robert P.} and Croonquist, {Mary Jo}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1023/A:1007970716227",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "137--153",
journal = "Landscape Ecology",
issn = "0921-2973",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

Miller, JN, Brooks, RP & Croonquist, MJ 1997, 'Effects of landscape patterns on biotic communities', Landscape Ecology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007970716227

Effects of landscape patterns on biotic communities. / Miller, Joseph N.; Brooks, Robert P.; Croonquist, Mary Jo.

In: Landscape Ecology, Vol. 12, No. 3, 01.01.1997, p. 137-153.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of landscape patterns on biotic communities

AU - Miller, Joseph N.

AU - Brooks, Robert P.

AU - Croonquist, Mary Jo

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - A comparative evaluation was performed using descriptors of landscape and land cover patterns as to how they relate to varying levels of anthropogenic disturbance and the structure of biotic communities. A spatial analysis program (a modified version of SPAN) was used to compute measures of land cover diversity, dominance, contagion, scaled dominance and contagion, fractal dimension of land cover patches, mean forest-wetland patch size, amount of forest edge, clustering of selected forest types, and the largest cover patches within two 100-km2 watersheds of the Ridge and Valley province of central Pennsylvania. Landscape pattern analysis was conducted on a subwatershed basis, emphasizing different levels of residential-agricultural versus forest land cover, the major difference between the two watersheds. Bird and vascular plant guilds were chosen to represent the overall biotic community. The general descriptors of diversity, contagion, mean forest-wetland patch size, proportion of forest cover, and the amount of forest edge were most effective in reflecting the disturbance levels within the watersheds and changes in guild composition for both birds and plants.

AB - A comparative evaluation was performed using descriptors of landscape and land cover patterns as to how they relate to varying levels of anthropogenic disturbance and the structure of biotic communities. A spatial analysis program (a modified version of SPAN) was used to compute measures of land cover diversity, dominance, contagion, scaled dominance and contagion, fractal dimension of land cover patches, mean forest-wetland patch size, amount of forest edge, clustering of selected forest types, and the largest cover patches within two 100-km2 watersheds of the Ridge and Valley province of central Pennsylvania. Landscape pattern analysis was conducted on a subwatershed basis, emphasizing different levels of residential-agricultural versus forest land cover, the major difference between the two watersheds. Bird and vascular plant guilds were chosen to represent the overall biotic community. The general descriptors of diversity, contagion, mean forest-wetland patch size, proportion of forest cover, and the amount of forest edge were most effective in reflecting the disturbance levels within the watersheds and changes in guild composition for both birds and plants.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031444548&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031444548&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1007970716227

DO - 10.1023/A:1007970716227

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0031444548

VL - 12

SP - 137

EP - 153

JO - Landscape Ecology

JF - Landscape Ecology

SN - 0921-2973

IS - 3

ER -