Effects of Provider Identity and Locus of Supportive Conversation on Coping With an Identity-Threatening Stressor

Jenny L. Crowley, Andrew High

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Guided by theory that posits outcomes of supportive interactions are shaped by source and message factors, this study examines two relevant features of interactions: the social identity of a support provider and locus of a supportive conversation. This study extends research on supportive communication by examining three possible identities of a provider (in-group, moderate out-group, out-group) alongside provider- or receiver-focused conversations. Participants (N = 200) coping with an identity-threatening stressor related to their college major engaged in an interaction with a confederate who manipulated their identity and locus of the conversation. Immediately following the supportive conversation, participants reported higher cognitive reappraisal when interacting with in-group and moderate out-group providers compared with out-group providers. Analyses revealed a disordinal interaction on internalized stigma, suggesting that the effects of provider- and receiver-focused messages depend on a provider’s identity. Interaction effects also persisted 3 weeks later.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalCommunication Research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

outgroup
coping
conversation
Communication
interaction
recipient
Group
Interaction
Locus
communication

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{73063b0e34d6416a8c2f436838866271,
title = "Effects of Provider Identity and Locus of Supportive Conversation on Coping With an Identity-Threatening Stressor",
abstract = "Guided by theory that posits outcomes of supportive interactions are shaped by source and message factors, this study examines two relevant features of interactions: the social identity of a support provider and locus of a supportive conversation. This study extends research on supportive communication by examining three possible identities of a provider (in-group, moderate out-group, out-group) alongside provider- or receiver-focused conversations. Participants (N = 200) coping with an identity-threatening stressor related to their college major engaged in an interaction with a confederate who manipulated their identity and locus of the conversation. Immediately following the supportive conversation, participants reported higher cognitive reappraisal when interacting with in-group and moderate out-group providers compared with out-group providers. Analyses revealed a disordinal interaction on internalized stigma, suggesting that the effects of provider- and receiver-focused messages depend on a provider’s identity. Interaction effects also persisted 3 weeks later.",
author = "Crowley, {Jenny L.} and Andrew High",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0093650219855906",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Communication Research",
issn = "0093-6502",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of Provider Identity and Locus of Supportive Conversation on Coping With an Identity-Threatening Stressor

AU - Crowley, Jenny L.

AU - High, Andrew

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Guided by theory that posits outcomes of supportive interactions are shaped by source and message factors, this study examines two relevant features of interactions: the social identity of a support provider and locus of a supportive conversation. This study extends research on supportive communication by examining three possible identities of a provider (in-group, moderate out-group, out-group) alongside provider- or receiver-focused conversations. Participants (N = 200) coping with an identity-threatening stressor related to their college major engaged in an interaction with a confederate who manipulated their identity and locus of the conversation. Immediately following the supportive conversation, participants reported higher cognitive reappraisal when interacting with in-group and moderate out-group providers compared with out-group providers. Analyses revealed a disordinal interaction on internalized stigma, suggesting that the effects of provider- and receiver-focused messages depend on a provider’s identity. Interaction effects also persisted 3 weeks later.

AB - Guided by theory that posits outcomes of supportive interactions are shaped by source and message factors, this study examines two relevant features of interactions: the social identity of a support provider and locus of a supportive conversation. This study extends research on supportive communication by examining three possible identities of a provider (in-group, moderate out-group, out-group) alongside provider- or receiver-focused conversations. Participants (N = 200) coping with an identity-threatening stressor related to their college major engaged in an interaction with a confederate who manipulated their identity and locus of the conversation. Immediately following the supportive conversation, participants reported higher cognitive reappraisal when interacting with in-group and moderate out-group providers compared with out-group providers. Analyses revealed a disordinal interaction on internalized stigma, suggesting that the effects of provider- and receiver-focused messages depend on a provider’s identity. Interaction effects also persisted 3 weeks later.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068115306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068115306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0093650219855906

DO - 10.1177/0093650219855906

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85068115306

JO - Communication Research

JF - Communication Research

SN - 0093-6502

ER -