Effects of Sectoral Diversity on Community Coalition Processes and Outcomes

Louis D. Brown, Rebecca Wells, Eric C. Jones, Sarah Chilenski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Collaboration with diverse partners is challenging but essential for the implementation of prevention programs and policies. Increased communication with partners from diverse sectors may help community coalitions overcome the challenges that diversity presents. We examined these issues empirically in a study of 17 substance use prevention coalitions in Mexico. Building on coalition and workgroup literatures, we hypothesized that sectoral diversity would improve outcomes but undermine coalition processes. Conversely, we expected uniformly positive effects from higher levels of intersectoral communication. Data are from a 2015 survey of 211 members within the 17 community coalitions. Regression models used sectoral diversity and intersectoral communication to predict coalition processes (cohesion, leader-member communication, efficiency) and outcomes (community support, community improvement, sustainability planning). Sectoral diversity was negatively associated with coalition processes and was not associated with coalition outcomes. Intersectoral communication was positively associated with two of the three measures of coalition outcomes but not associated with coalition processes. Our findings concur with those from prior research indicating that sectoral diversity may undermine coalition processes. However, more communication between sectors may facilitate the coalition outcomes of community support and sustainability planning. Skilled team leaders and participatory decision making may also help coalitions promote intersectoral communication, thereby engaging diverse community sectors to implement preventive interventions and actualize sustained public health impact.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)600-609
Number of pages10
JournalPrevention Science
Volume18
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2017

Fingerprint

Communication
Interpersonal Relations
Mexico
Decision Making
Public Health
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Brown, Louis D. ; Wells, Rebecca ; Jones, Eric C. ; Chilenski, Sarah. / Effects of Sectoral Diversity on Community Coalition Processes and Outcomes. In: Prevention Science. 2017 ; Vol. 18, No. 5. pp. 600-609.
@article{f5048eedb62249449af35bc49e5833d0,
title = "Effects of Sectoral Diversity on Community Coalition Processes and Outcomes",
abstract = "Collaboration with diverse partners is challenging but essential for the implementation of prevention programs and policies. Increased communication with partners from diverse sectors may help community coalitions overcome the challenges that diversity presents. We examined these issues empirically in a study of 17 substance use prevention coalitions in Mexico. Building on coalition and workgroup literatures, we hypothesized that sectoral diversity would improve outcomes but undermine coalition processes. Conversely, we expected uniformly positive effects from higher levels of intersectoral communication. Data are from a 2015 survey of 211 members within the 17 community coalitions. Regression models used sectoral diversity and intersectoral communication to predict coalition processes (cohesion, leader-member communication, efficiency) and outcomes (community support, community improvement, sustainability planning). Sectoral diversity was negatively associated with coalition processes and was not associated with coalition outcomes. Intersectoral communication was positively associated with two of the three measures of coalition outcomes but not associated with coalition processes. Our findings concur with those from prior research indicating that sectoral diversity may undermine coalition processes. However, more communication between sectors may facilitate the coalition outcomes of community support and sustainability planning. Skilled team leaders and participatory decision making may also help coalitions promote intersectoral communication, thereby engaging diverse community sectors to implement preventive interventions and actualize sustained public health impact.",
author = "Brown, {Louis D.} and Rebecca Wells and Jones, {Eric C.} and Sarah Chilenski",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11121-017-0796-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "600--609",
journal = "Prevention Science",
issn = "1389-4986",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

Effects of Sectoral Diversity on Community Coalition Processes and Outcomes. / Brown, Louis D.; Wells, Rebecca; Jones, Eric C.; Chilenski, Sarah.

In: Prevention Science, Vol. 18, No. 5, 01.07.2017, p. 600-609.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of Sectoral Diversity on Community Coalition Processes and Outcomes

AU - Brown, Louis D.

AU - Wells, Rebecca

AU - Jones, Eric C.

AU - Chilenski, Sarah

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Collaboration with diverse partners is challenging but essential for the implementation of prevention programs and policies. Increased communication with partners from diverse sectors may help community coalitions overcome the challenges that diversity presents. We examined these issues empirically in a study of 17 substance use prevention coalitions in Mexico. Building on coalition and workgroup literatures, we hypothesized that sectoral diversity would improve outcomes but undermine coalition processes. Conversely, we expected uniformly positive effects from higher levels of intersectoral communication. Data are from a 2015 survey of 211 members within the 17 community coalitions. Regression models used sectoral diversity and intersectoral communication to predict coalition processes (cohesion, leader-member communication, efficiency) and outcomes (community support, community improvement, sustainability planning). Sectoral diversity was negatively associated with coalition processes and was not associated with coalition outcomes. Intersectoral communication was positively associated with two of the three measures of coalition outcomes but not associated with coalition processes. Our findings concur with those from prior research indicating that sectoral diversity may undermine coalition processes. However, more communication between sectors may facilitate the coalition outcomes of community support and sustainability planning. Skilled team leaders and participatory decision making may also help coalitions promote intersectoral communication, thereby engaging diverse community sectors to implement preventive interventions and actualize sustained public health impact.

AB - Collaboration with diverse partners is challenging but essential for the implementation of prevention programs and policies. Increased communication with partners from diverse sectors may help community coalitions overcome the challenges that diversity presents. We examined these issues empirically in a study of 17 substance use prevention coalitions in Mexico. Building on coalition and workgroup literatures, we hypothesized that sectoral diversity would improve outcomes but undermine coalition processes. Conversely, we expected uniformly positive effects from higher levels of intersectoral communication. Data are from a 2015 survey of 211 members within the 17 community coalitions. Regression models used sectoral diversity and intersectoral communication to predict coalition processes (cohesion, leader-member communication, efficiency) and outcomes (community support, community improvement, sustainability planning). Sectoral diversity was negatively associated with coalition processes and was not associated with coalition outcomes. Intersectoral communication was positively associated with two of the three measures of coalition outcomes but not associated with coalition processes. Our findings concur with those from prior research indicating that sectoral diversity may undermine coalition processes. However, more communication between sectors may facilitate the coalition outcomes of community support and sustainability planning. Skilled team leaders and participatory decision making may also help coalitions promote intersectoral communication, thereby engaging diverse community sectors to implement preventive interventions and actualize sustained public health impact.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018455825&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018455825&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11121-017-0796-y

DO - 10.1007/s11121-017-0796-y

M3 - Article

C2 - 28480493

AN - SCOPUS:85018455825

VL - 18

SP - 600

EP - 609

JO - Prevention Science

JF - Prevention Science

SN - 1389-4986

IS - 5

ER -