Effects of Task Relevance Instructions and Topic Beliefs on Reading Processes and Memory

Catherine M. Bohn-Gettler, Matthew T. McCrudden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of task relevance instructions and topic beliefs on reading processes and memory for belief-related text. Undergraduates received task instructions (focus on arguments for vs. against) before reading a dual-position text. In Experiment 1 (n = 88), a reading time methodology showed no differences in reading time for task-relevant and task-irrelevant text, but participants recalled task-relevant text better than task-irrelevant text independently of whether the information was consistent with their topic beliefs. In Experiment 2 (n = 76), a think-aloud methodology showed that participants engaged in confirmation strategies when reading belief-consistent text and disconfirmation strategies when reading belief-inconsistent text, independently of whether the information was relevant to their task instructions. Nonetheless, participants recalled task-relevant text better than task-irrelevant text. The results indicate that task relevance instructions affect memory independently of beliefs but that beliefs affect processing independently of task relevance instructions. Thus, moment-by-moment reading processes and memory for text can operate differently as a function of topic beliefs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)410-431
Number of pages22
JournalDiscourse Processes
Volume55
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 19 2018

Fingerprint

instruction
Data storage equipment
Experiments
Processing
Process of Reading
experiment
methodology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{7e94a4ca12ef43f6bc493e821cf8c245,
title = "Effects of Task Relevance Instructions and Topic Beliefs on Reading Processes and Memory",
abstract = "This study investigated the effects of task relevance instructions and topic beliefs on reading processes and memory for belief-related text. Undergraduates received task instructions (focus on arguments for vs. against) before reading a dual-position text. In Experiment 1 (n = 88), a reading time methodology showed no differences in reading time for task-relevant and task-irrelevant text, but participants recalled task-relevant text better than task-irrelevant text independently of whether the information was consistent with their topic beliefs. In Experiment 2 (n = 76), a think-aloud methodology showed that participants engaged in confirmation strategies when reading belief-consistent text and disconfirmation strategies when reading belief-inconsistent text, independently of whether the information was relevant to their task instructions. Nonetheless, participants recalled task-relevant text better than task-irrelevant text. The results indicate that task relevance instructions affect memory independently of beliefs but that beliefs affect processing independently of task relevance instructions. Thus, moment-by-moment reading processes and memory for text can operate differently as a function of topic beliefs.",
author = "Bohn-Gettler, {Catherine M.} and McCrudden, {Matthew T.}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1080/0163853X.2017.1292824",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "410--431",
journal = "Discourse Processes",
issn = "0163-853X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Effects of Task Relevance Instructions and Topic Beliefs on Reading Processes and Memory. / Bohn-Gettler, Catherine M.; McCrudden, Matthew T.

In: Discourse Processes, Vol. 55, No. 4, 19.05.2018, p. 410-431.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of Task Relevance Instructions and Topic Beliefs on Reading Processes and Memory

AU - Bohn-Gettler, Catherine M.

AU - McCrudden, Matthew T.

PY - 2018/5/19

Y1 - 2018/5/19

N2 - This study investigated the effects of task relevance instructions and topic beliefs on reading processes and memory for belief-related text. Undergraduates received task instructions (focus on arguments for vs. against) before reading a dual-position text. In Experiment 1 (n = 88), a reading time methodology showed no differences in reading time for task-relevant and task-irrelevant text, but participants recalled task-relevant text better than task-irrelevant text independently of whether the information was consistent with their topic beliefs. In Experiment 2 (n = 76), a think-aloud methodology showed that participants engaged in confirmation strategies when reading belief-consistent text and disconfirmation strategies when reading belief-inconsistent text, independently of whether the information was relevant to their task instructions. Nonetheless, participants recalled task-relevant text better than task-irrelevant text. The results indicate that task relevance instructions affect memory independently of beliefs but that beliefs affect processing independently of task relevance instructions. Thus, moment-by-moment reading processes and memory for text can operate differently as a function of topic beliefs.

AB - This study investigated the effects of task relevance instructions and topic beliefs on reading processes and memory for belief-related text. Undergraduates received task instructions (focus on arguments for vs. against) before reading a dual-position text. In Experiment 1 (n = 88), a reading time methodology showed no differences in reading time for task-relevant and task-irrelevant text, but participants recalled task-relevant text better than task-irrelevant text independently of whether the information was consistent with their topic beliefs. In Experiment 2 (n = 76), a think-aloud methodology showed that participants engaged in confirmation strategies when reading belief-consistent text and disconfirmation strategies when reading belief-inconsistent text, independently of whether the information was relevant to their task instructions. Nonetheless, participants recalled task-relevant text better than task-irrelevant text. The results indicate that task relevance instructions affect memory independently of beliefs but that beliefs affect processing independently of task relevance instructions. Thus, moment-by-moment reading processes and memory for text can operate differently as a function of topic beliefs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015716010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015716010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0163853X.2017.1292824

DO - 10.1080/0163853X.2017.1292824

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85015716010

VL - 55

SP - 410

EP - 431

JO - Discourse Processes

JF - Discourse Processes

SN - 0163-853X

IS - 4

ER -