Effects of voluntary agonist–antagonist coactivation on stability of vertical posture

Momoko Yamagata, Ali Falaki, Mark Latash

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We explored the effects of voluntary coactivation of agonist–antagonist leg and trunk muscles on stability of vertical posture. Young healthy subjects performed several tasks while standing with no additional muscle coactivation, low coactivation, and high coactivation. Postural stability was estimated using indices of postural sway and of intertrial variance in the space of muscle groups with parallel scaling of activation levels (M-modes). An increase in coactivation led to a significant increase in the postural sway speed reflected in faster rambling and trembling trajectories. Coactivation also led to a relative drop in the variance component that had no effects on the center of pressure coordinate and an increase in the component that shifted the center of pressure. We conclude that additional muscle coactivation does not help to stabilize vertical posture and is more likely to lead to postural destabilization. The results are consistent with an earlier hypothesis on muscle coactivation ensuring abundance (excessive degrees of freedom) at the level of control variables.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)304-326
Number of pages23
JournalMotor control
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Posture
Muscles
Pressure
Leg
Healthy Volunteers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Yamagata, Momoko ; Falaki, Ali ; Latash, Mark. / Effects of voluntary agonist–antagonist coactivation on stability of vertical posture. In: Motor control. 2019 ; Vol. 23, No. 3. pp. 304-326.
@article{5c0f5daa6ef84d039d61bd53b08ee13a,
title = "Effects of voluntary agonist–antagonist coactivation on stability of vertical posture",
abstract = "We explored the effects of voluntary coactivation of agonist–antagonist leg and trunk muscles on stability of vertical posture. Young healthy subjects performed several tasks while standing with no additional muscle coactivation, low coactivation, and high coactivation. Postural stability was estimated using indices of postural sway and of intertrial variance in the space of muscle groups with parallel scaling of activation levels (M-modes). An increase in coactivation led to a significant increase in the postural sway speed reflected in faster rambling and trembling trajectories. Coactivation also led to a relative drop in the variance component that had no effects on the center of pressure coordinate and an increase in the component that shifted the center of pressure. We conclude that additional muscle coactivation does not help to stabilize vertical posture and is more likely to lead to postural destabilization. The results are consistent with an earlier hypothesis on muscle coactivation ensuring abundance (excessive degrees of freedom) at the level of control variables.",
author = "Momoko Yamagata and Ali Falaki and Mark Latash",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1123/mc.2018-0038",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "304--326",
journal = "Motor Control",
issn = "1087-1640",
publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Effects of voluntary agonist–antagonist coactivation on stability of vertical posture. / Yamagata, Momoko; Falaki, Ali; Latash, Mark.

In: Motor control, Vol. 23, No. 3, 01.01.2019, p. 304-326.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of voluntary agonist–antagonist coactivation on stability of vertical posture

AU - Yamagata, Momoko

AU - Falaki, Ali

AU - Latash, Mark

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - We explored the effects of voluntary coactivation of agonist–antagonist leg and trunk muscles on stability of vertical posture. Young healthy subjects performed several tasks while standing with no additional muscle coactivation, low coactivation, and high coactivation. Postural stability was estimated using indices of postural sway and of intertrial variance in the space of muscle groups with parallel scaling of activation levels (M-modes). An increase in coactivation led to a significant increase in the postural sway speed reflected in faster rambling and trembling trajectories. Coactivation also led to a relative drop in the variance component that had no effects on the center of pressure coordinate and an increase in the component that shifted the center of pressure. We conclude that additional muscle coactivation does not help to stabilize vertical posture and is more likely to lead to postural destabilization. The results are consistent with an earlier hypothesis on muscle coactivation ensuring abundance (excessive degrees of freedom) at the level of control variables.

AB - We explored the effects of voluntary coactivation of agonist–antagonist leg and trunk muscles on stability of vertical posture. Young healthy subjects performed several tasks while standing with no additional muscle coactivation, low coactivation, and high coactivation. Postural stability was estimated using indices of postural sway and of intertrial variance in the space of muscle groups with parallel scaling of activation levels (M-modes). An increase in coactivation led to a significant increase in the postural sway speed reflected in faster rambling and trembling trajectories. Coactivation also led to a relative drop in the variance component that had no effects on the center of pressure coordinate and an increase in the component that shifted the center of pressure. We conclude that additional muscle coactivation does not help to stabilize vertical posture and is more likely to lead to postural destabilization. The results are consistent with an earlier hypothesis on muscle coactivation ensuring abundance (excessive degrees of freedom) at the level of control variables.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068125270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068125270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1123/mc.2018-0038

DO - 10.1123/mc.2018-0038

M3 - Article

C2 - 30612525

AN - SCOPUS:85068125270

VL - 23

SP - 304

EP - 326

JO - Motor Control

JF - Motor Control

SN - 1087-1640

IS - 3

ER -