Effluence, “waste” and African Humanism: extra-anthropocentric being and human rightness*

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

I propose a extra-anthropocentric contextualisation of normative human rights as human rightness. To undo the normative construction of the human, I turn to a theory of the effluent. I argue effluent communities, defined as communities who have never depended on the state, re-envision normative human rights. Effluent communities suggest the necessity for a rethinking of the centrality of the state in Butlerian conceptions of precarity and grievability, since effluent communities have never found the state to be a source of such security. Further, I observe that this decentring of the state points to limitations in forms of postcolonial critical resistance that pose the state (be it colonial or postcolonial) as an adversary; or simply deconstruct the impossibility of the state’s support of the human through postmodernist scepticism. I analyse Mphahlele’s specific reading of African Humanism, demonstrating that it offers a way to grieve material being that is extrinsic to the lenses of the state, racially inflected abjection and subject/object-human/non-human animal binaries. Rather than name a set of effluent communities, I propose an exemplary bearing witness to the material dying/dead, instantiating what is commonly regarded as waste, if not toxic dirt, as the occasion for a practice of extra-anthropocentric human rightness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)158-178
Number of pages21
JournalSocial Dynamics
Volume44
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2018

Fingerprint

humanism
community
human rights
dying
witness
animal

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{88c56ba05a8b42b7824dbb7d4f3ac477,
title = "Effluence, “waste” and African Humanism: extra-anthropocentric being and human rightness*",
abstract = "I propose a extra-anthropocentric contextualisation of normative human rights as human rightness. To undo the normative construction of the human, I turn to a theory of the effluent. I argue effluent communities, defined as communities who have never depended on the state, re-envision normative human rights. Effluent communities suggest the necessity for a rethinking of the centrality of the state in Butlerian conceptions of precarity and grievability, since effluent communities have never found the state to be a source of such security. Further, I observe that this decentring of the state points to limitations in forms of postcolonial critical resistance that pose the state (be it colonial or postcolonial) as an adversary; or simply deconstruct the impossibility of the state’s support of the human through postmodernist scepticism. I analyse Mphahlele’s specific reading of African Humanism, demonstrating that it offers a way to grieve material being that is extrinsic to the lenses of the state, racially inflected abjection and subject/object-human/non-human animal binaries. Rather than name a set of effluent communities, I propose an exemplary bearing witness to the material dying/dead, instantiating what is commonly regarded as waste, if not toxic dirt, as the occasion for a practice of extra-anthropocentric human rightness.",
author = "Jolly, {Rosemary Jane}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/02533952.2018.1449723",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "158--178",
journal = "Social Dynamics",
issn = "0253-3952",
publisher = "Centre for African Studies, University of Cape Town",
number = "1",

}

Effluence, “waste” and African Humanism : extra-anthropocentric being and human rightness*. / Jolly, Rosemary Jane.

In: Social Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 1, 02.01.2018, p. 158-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effluence, “waste” and African Humanism

T2 - extra-anthropocentric being and human rightness*

AU - Jolly, Rosemary Jane

PY - 2018/1/2

Y1 - 2018/1/2

N2 - I propose a extra-anthropocentric contextualisation of normative human rights as human rightness. To undo the normative construction of the human, I turn to a theory of the effluent. I argue effluent communities, defined as communities who have never depended on the state, re-envision normative human rights. Effluent communities suggest the necessity for a rethinking of the centrality of the state in Butlerian conceptions of precarity and grievability, since effluent communities have never found the state to be a source of such security. Further, I observe that this decentring of the state points to limitations in forms of postcolonial critical resistance that pose the state (be it colonial or postcolonial) as an adversary; or simply deconstruct the impossibility of the state’s support of the human through postmodernist scepticism. I analyse Mphahlele’s specific reading of African Humanism, demonstrating that it offers a way to grieve material being that is extrinsic to the lenses of the state, racially inflected abjection and subject/object-human/non-human animal binaries. Rather than name a set of effluent communities, I propose an exemplary bearing witness to the material dying/dead, instantiating what is commonly regarded as waste, if not toxic dirt, as the occasion for a practice of extra-anthropocentric human rightness.

AB - I propose a extra-anthropocentric contextualisation of normative human rights as human rightness. To undo the normative construction of the human, I turn to a theory of the effluent. I argue effluent communities, defined as communities who have never depended on the state, re-envision normative human rights. Effluent communities suggest the necessity for a rethinking of the centrality of the state in Butlerian conceptions of precarity and grievability, since effluent communities have never found the state to be a source of such security. Further, I observe that this decentring of the state points to limitations in forms of postcolonial critical resistance that pose the state (be it colonial or postcolonial) as an adversary; or simply deconstruct the impossibility of the state’s support of the human through postmodernist scepticism. I analyse Mphahlele’s specific reading of African Humanism, demonstrating that it offers a way to grieve material being that is extrinsic to the lenses of the state, racially inflected abjection and subject/object-human/non-human animal binaries. Rather than name a set of effluent communities, I propose an exemplary bearing witness to the material dying/dead, instantiating what is commonly regarded as waste, if not toxic dirt, as the occasion for a practice of extra-anthropocentric human rightness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044780167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044780167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02533952.2018.1449723

DO - 10.1080/02533952.2018.1449723

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85044780167

VL - 44

SP - 158

EP - 178

JO - Social Dynamics

JF - Social Dynamics

SN - 0253-3952

IS - 1

ER -