Electoral stress and revenue structures in the american states

Searching for the Elusive Fiscal Illusion

David Lynn Lowery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While frequently used to explain the origin and development of fiscal structures, the concept of “fiscal illusion” has proven remarkably soft when use for purposes that go beyond the most general interpretations of fiscal politics. This results in part because of the lack of any agreement on precisely which revenue mechanisms are illusionary; nearly all of the revenue sources available to state and local governments have been identified as illusionary in one way or another. If all or nearly all revenue sources are used as tools of fiscal illusion, then the concept is of little use in explaining interstate variation in fiscal structures. This article attempts to assess which, if any, of 11 revenue mechanisms or characteristics of the tax system as a whole are used as tools of fiscal illusion by testing the hypothesis that use of illusionary mechanisms is positively related to the level of “electoral stress” in a state. That is, if politicians under electoral pressure do manipulate fiscal instruments in order to generate fiscal illusions, we would expect greater reliance on illusionary mechanisms under conditions of more extreme electoral pressure than under conditions of minimal electoral pressure. The hypothesis is tested with state revenue and electoral data for 46 continental states for the periods 1960 to 1977 and 1977 to 1982.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5-46
Number of pages42
JournalAmerican Politics Research
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1987

Fingerprint

revenue
tax system
politician
interpretation
politics
lack

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{892a99efb7f0408c968bf2572edc55ad,
title = "Electoral stress and revenue structures in the american states: Searching for the Elusive Fiscal Illusion",
abstract = "While frequently used to explain the origin and development of fiscal structures, the concept of “fiscal illusion” has proven remarkably soft when use for purposes that go beyond the most general interpretations of fiscal politics. This results in part because of the lack of any agreement on precisely which revenue mechanisms are illusionary; nearly all of the revenue sources available to state and local governments have been identified as illusionary in one way or another. If all or nearly all revenue sources are used as tools of fiscal illusion, then the concept is of little use in explaining interstate variation in fiscal structures. This article attempts to assess which, if any, of 11 revenue mechanisms or characteristics of the tax system as a whole are used as tools of fiscal illusion by testing the hypothesis that use of illusionary mechanisms is positively related to the level of “electoral stress” in a state. That is, if politicians under electoral pressure do manipulate fiscal instruments in order to generate fiscal illusions, we would expect greater reliance on illusionary mechanisms under conditions of more extreme electoral pressure than under conditions of minimal electoral pressure. The hypothesis is tested with state revenue and electoral data for 46 continental states for the periods 1960 to 1977 and 1977 to 1982.",
author = "Lowery, {David Lynn}",
year = "1987",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1532673X8701500101",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "5--46",
journal = "American Politics Research",
issn = "1532-673X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Electoral stress and revenue structures in the american states : Searching for the Elusive Fiscal Illusion. / Lowery, David Lynn.

In: American Politics Research, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.01.1987, p. 5-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electoral stress and revenue structures in the american states

T2 - Searching for the Elusive Fiscal Illusion

AU - Lowery, David Lynn

PY - 1987/1/1

Y1 - 1987/1/1

N2 - While frequently used to explain the origin and development of fiscal structures, the concept of “fiscal illusion” has proven remarkably soft when use for purposes that go beyond the most general interpretations of fiscal politics. This results in part because of the lack of any agreement on precisely which revenue mechanisms are illusionary; nearly all of the revenue sources available to state and local governments have been identified as illusionary in one way or another. If all or nearly all revenue sources are used as tools of fiscal illusion, then the concept is of little use in explaining interstate variation in fiscal structures. This article attempts to assess which, if any, of 11 revenue mechanisms or characteristics of the tax system as a whole are used as tools of fiscal illusion by testing the hypothesis that use of illusionary mechanisms is positively related to the level of “electoral stress” in a state. That is, if politicians under electoral pressure do manipulate fiscal instruments in order to generate fiscal illusions, we would expect greater reliance on illusionary mechanisms under conditions of more extreme electoral pressure than under conditions of minimal electoral pressure. The hypothesis is tested with state revenue and electoral data for 46 continental states for the periods 1960 to 1977 and 1977 to 1982.

AB - While frequently used to explain the origin and development of fiscal structures, the concept of “fiscal illusion” has proven remarkably soft when use for purposes that go beyond the most general interpretations of fiscal politics. This results in part because of the lack of any agreement on precisely which revenue mechanisms are illusionary; nearly all of the revenue sources available to state and local governments have been identified as illusionary in one way or another. If all or nearly all revenue sources are used as tools of fiscal illusion, then the concept is of little use in explaining interstate variation in fiscal structures. This article attempts to assess which, if any, of 11 revenue mechanisms or characteristics of the tax system as a whole are used as tools of fiscal illusion by testing the hypothesis that use of illusionary mechanisms is positively related to the level of “electoral stress” in a state. That is, if politicians under electoral pressure do manipulate fiscal instruments in order to generate fiscal illusions, we would expect greater reliance on illusionary mechanisms under conditions of more extreme electoral pressure than under conditions of minimal electoral pressure. The hypothesis is tested with state revenue and electoral data for 46 continental states for the periods 1960 to 1977 and 1977 to 1982.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928461735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928461735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1532673X8701500101

DO - 10.1177/1532673X8701500101

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 5

EP - 46

JO - American Politics Research

JF - American Politics Research

SN - 1532-673X

IS - 1

ER -