Electrical conductivity measurements from the GISP2 and GRIP Greenland ice cores

K. C. Taylor, C. U. Hammer, Richard B. Alley, H. B. Clausen, D. Dahl-Jensen, A. J. Gow, N. S. Gundestrup, J. Kipfstuh, J. C. Moore, E. D. Waddington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

183 Scopus citations

Abstract

The direct-current electrical conductivity of glacial ice depends on its acidity1-3, and can also indicate changes in climate, as ice formed in cold, dusty periods has a high concentration of alkaline dust1, 4, 5, which significantly reduces the conductivity6, 7 compared to warmer, less dusty periods. Here we present electrical conductivity records for the Greenland Ice Sheet Project 2 (GISP2) and Greenland Ice-core Project (GRIP) ice cores, drilled 28 km apart to enable direct comparison of the results. The upper parts of both records are consistent with previous evidence from other Greenland cores4, 8& #150;12 for a stable Greenland climate during the Holocene, and a series of warm events punctuating the last glacial period. However, there is a significant discrepancy between the two records in the bottom 10% of the cores, calling into question recent reports of climate variability in the last interglacial4, 8 and the penultimate glaciation8. At this stage, it is too early to say what exactly is causing the discrepancy, although ice flow may have introduced some discontinuities into the records. Further work will be necessary to establish how much climatic information it will eventually be possible to extract from the lower parts of the two cores.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)549-552
Number of pages4
JournalNature
Volume366
Issue number6455
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 1993

    Fingerprint

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General

Cite this

Taylor, K. C., Hammer, C. U., Alley, R. B., Clausen, H. B., Dahl-Jensen, D., Gow, A. J., ... Waddington, E. D. (1993). Electrical conductivity measurements from the GISP2 and GRIP Greenland ice cores. Nature, 366(6455), 549-552. https://doi.org/10.1038/366549a0