Electronic health records improve clinical note quality

Harry B. Burke, Laura L. Sessums, Albert Hoang, Dorothy A. Becher, Paul Fontelo, Fang Liu, Mark Stephens, Louis N. Pangaro, Patrick G. O'Malley, Nancy S. Baxi, Christopher W. Bunt, Vincent F. Capaldill, Julie M. Chen, Barbara A. Cooper, David A. Djuric, Joshua A. Hodge, Shawn Kane, Charles Magee, Zizette R. Makary, Renee M. MalloryThomas Miller, Adam Saperstein, Jessica Servey, Ronald W. Gimbel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: and objective The clinical note documents the clinician's information collection, problem assessment, clinical management, and its used for administrative purposes. Electronic health records (EHRs) are being implemented in clinical practices throughout the USA yet it is not known whether they improve the quality of clinical notes. The goal in this study was to determine if EHRs improve the quality of outpatient clinical notes. Materials and methods: A five and a half year longitudinal retrospective multicenter quantitative study comparing the quality of handwritten and electronic outpatient clinical visit notes for 100 patients with type 2 diabetes at three time points: 6 months prior to the introduction of the EHR (before-EHR), 6 months after the introduction of the EHR (after- EHR), and 5 years after the introduction of the EHR (5-year-EHR). QNOTE, a validated quantitative instrument, was used to assess the quality of outpatient clinical notes. Its scores can range from a low of 0 to a high of 100. Sixteen primary care physicians with active practices used QNOTE to determine the quality of the 300 patient notes. Results: The before-EHR, after-EHR, and 5-year-EHR grand mean scores (SD) were 52.0 (18.4), 61.2 (16.3), and 80.4 (8.9), respectively, and the change in scores for before-EHR to after-EHR and before-EHR to 5-year-EHR were 18% (p<0.0001) and 55% (p<0.0001), respectively. All the element and grand mean quality scores significantly improved over the 5-year time interval. Conclusions: The EHR significantly improved the overall quality of the outpatient clinical note and the quality of all its elements, including the core and non-core elements. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that the EHR significantly improves the quality of clinical notes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)199-205
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Outpatients
Primary Care Physicians
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Multicenter Studies

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Burke, H. B., Sessums, L. L., Hoang, A., Becher, D. A., Fontelo, P., Liu, F., ... Gimbel, R. W. (2015). Electronic health records improve clinical note quality. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 22(1), 199-205. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002726
Burke, Harry B. ; Sessums, Laura L. ; Hoang, Albert ; Becher, Dorothy A. ; Fontelo, Paul ; Liu, Fang ; Stephens, Mark ; Pangaro, Louis N. ; O'Malley, Patrick G. ; Baxi, Nancy S. ; Bunt, Christopher W. ; Capaldill, Vincent F. ; Chen, Julie M. ; Cooper, Barbara A. ; Djuric, David A. ; Hodge, Joshua A. ; Kane, Shawn ; Magee, Charles ; Makary, Zizette R. ; Mallory, Renee M. ; Miller, Thomas ; Saperstein, Adam ; Servey, Jessica ; Gimbel, Ronald W. / Electronic health records improve clinical note quality. In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2015 ; Vol. 22, No. 1. pp. 199-205.
@article{f3c5cf2b1c024256b139cf641f438ac9,
title = "Electronic health records improve clinical note quality",
abstract = "Background: and objective The clinical note documents the clinician's information collection, problem assessment, clinical management, and its used for administrative purposes. Electronic health records (EHRs) are being implemented in clinical practices throughout the USA yet it is not known whether they improve the quality of clinical notes. The goal in this study was to determine if EHRs improve the quality of outpatient clinical notes. Materials and methods: A five and a half year longitudinal retrospective multicenter quantitative study comparing the quality of handwritten and electronic outpatient clinical visit notes for 100 patients with type 2 diabetes at three time points: 6 months prior to the introduction of the EHR (before-EHR), 6 months after the introduction of the EHR (after- EHR), and 5 years after the introduction of the EHR (5-year-EHR). QNOTE, a validated quantitative instrument, was used to assess the quality of outpatient clinical notes. Its scores can range from a low of 0 to a high of 100. Sixteen primary care physicians with active practices used QNOTE to determine the quality of the 300 patient notes. Results: The before-EHR, after-EHR, and 5-year-EHR grand mean scores (SD) were 52.0 (18.4), 61.2 (16.3), and 80.4 (8.9), respectively, and the change in scores for before-EHR to after-EHR and before-EHR to 5-year-EHR were 18{\%} (p<0.0001) and 55{\%} (p<0.0001), respectively. All the element and grand mean quality scores significantly improved over the 5-year time interval. Conclusions: The EHR significantly improved the overall quality of the outpatient clinical note and the quality of all its elements, including the core and non-core elements. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that the EHR significantly improves the quality of clinical notes.",
author = "Burke, {Harry B.} and Sessums, {Laura L.} and Albert Hoang and Becher, {Dorothy A.} and Paul Fontelo and Fang Liu and Mark Stephens and Pangaro, {Louis N.} and O'Malley, {Patrick G.} and Baxi, {Nancy S.} and Bunt, {Christopher W.} and Capaldill, {Vincent F.} and Chen, {Julie M.} and Cooper, {Barbara A.} and Djuric, {David A.} and Hodge, {Joshua A.} and Shawn Kane and Charles Magee and Makary, {Zizette R.} and Mallory, {Renee M.} and Thomas Miller and Adam Saperstein and Jessica Servey and Gimbel, {Ronald W.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002726",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "199--205",
journal = "Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA",
issn = "1067-5027",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

Burke, HB, Sessums, LL, Hoang, A, Becher, DA, Fontelo, P, Liu, F, Stephens, M, Pangaro, LN, O'Malley, PG, Baxi, NS, Bunt, CW, Capaldill, VF, Chen, JM, Cooper, BA, Djuric, DA, Hodge, JA, Kane, S, Magee, C, Makary, ZR, Mallory, RM, Miller, T, Saperstein, A, Servey, J & Gimbel, RW 2015, 'Electronic health records improve clinical note quality', Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 199-205. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002726

Electronic health records improve clinical note quality. / Burke, Harry B.; Sessums, Laura L.; Hoang, Albert; Becher, Dorothy A.; Fontelo, Paul; Liu, Fang; Stephens, Mark; Pangaro, Louis N.; O'Malley, Patrick G.; Baxi, Nancy S.; Bunt, Christopher W.; Capaldill, Vincent F.; Chen, Julie M.; Cooper, Barbara A.; Djuric, David A.; Hodge, Joshua A.; Kane, Shawn; Magee, Charles; Makary, Zizette R.; Mallory, Renee M.; Miller, Thomas; Saperstein, Adam; Servey, Jessica; Gimbel, Ronald W.

In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol. 22, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 199-205.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electronic health records improve clinical note quality

AU - Burke, Harry B.

AU - Sessums, Laura L.

AU - Hoang, Albert

AU - Becher, Dorothy A.

AU - Fontelo, Paul

AU - Liu, Fang

AU - Stephens, Mark

AU - Pangaro, Louis N.

AU - O'Malley, Patrick G.

AU - Baxi, Nancy S.

AU - Bunt, Christopher W.

AU - Capaldill, Vincent F.

AU - Chen, Julie M.

AU - Cooper, Barbara A.

AU - Djuric, David A.

AU - Hodge, Joshua A.

AU - Kane, Shawn

AU - Magee, Charles

AU - Makary, Zizette R.

AU - Mallory, Renee M.

AU - Miller, Thomas

AU - Saperstein, Adam

AU - Servey, Jessica

AU - Gimbel, Ronald W.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Background: and objective The clinical note documents the clinician's information collection, problem assessment, clinical management, and its used for administrative purposes. Electronic health records (EHRs) are being implemented in clinical practices throughout the USA yet it is not known whether they improve the quality of clinical notes. The goal in this study was to determine if EHRs improve the quality of outpatient clinical notes. Materials and methods: A five and a half year longitudinal retrospective multicenter quantitative study comparing the quality of handwritten and electronic outpatient clinical visit notes for 100 patients with type 2 diabetes at three time points: 6 months prior to the introduction of the EHR (before-EHR), 6 months after the introduction of the EHR (after- EHR), and 5 years after the introduction of the EHR (5-year-EHR). QNOTE, a validated quantitative instrument, was used to assess the quality of outpatient clinical notes. Its scores can range from a low of 0 to a high of 100. Sixteen primary care physicians with active practices used QNOTE to determine the quality of the 300 patient notes. Results: The before-EHR, after-EHR, and 5-year-EHR grand mean scores (SD) were 52.0 (18.4), 61.2 (16.3), and 80.4 (8.9), respectively, and the change in scores for before-EHR to after-EHR and before-EHR to 5-year-EHR were 18% (p<0.0001) and 55% (p<0.0001), respectively. All the element and grand mean quality scores significantly improved over the 5-year time interval. Conclusions: The EHR significantly improved the overall quality of the outpatient clinical note and the quality of all its elements, including the core and non-core elements. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that the EHR significantly improves the quality of clinical notes.

AB - Background: and objective The clinical note documents the clinician's information collection, problem assessment, clinical management, and its used for administrative purposes. Electronic health records (EHRs) are being implemented in clinical practices throughout the USA yet it is not known whether they improve the quality of clinical notes. The goal in this study was to determine if EHRs improve the quality of outpatient clinical notes. Materials and methods: A five and a half year longitudinal retrospective multicenter quantitative study comparing the quality of handwritten and electronic outpatient clinical visit notes for 100 patients with type 2 diabetes at three time points: 6 months prior to the introduction of the EHR (before-EHR), 6 months after the introduction of the EHR (after- EHR), and 5 years after the introduction of the EHR (5-year-EHR). QNOTE, a validated quantitative instrument, was used to assess the quality of outpatient clinical notes. Its scores can range from a low of 0 to a high of 100. Sixteen primary care physicians with active practices used QNOTE to determine the quality of the 300 patient notes. Results: The before-EHR, after-EHR, and 5-year-EHR grand mean scores (SD) were 52.0 (18.4), 61.2 (16.3), and 80.4 (8.9), respectively, and the change in scores for before-EHR to after-EHR and before-EHR to 5-year-EHR were 18% (p<0.0001) and 55% (p<0.0001), respectively. All the element and grand mean quality scores significantly improved over the 5-year time interval. Conclusions: The EHR significantly improved the overall quality of the outpatient clinical note and the quality of all its elements, including the core and non-core elements. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that the EHR significantly improves the quality of clinical notes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929503171&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929503171&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002726

DO - 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002726

M3 - Article

C2 - 25342178

AN - SCOPUS:84929503171

VL - 22

SP - 199

EP - 205

JO - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

JF - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

SN - 1067-5027

IS - 1

ER -