Electronic measures of surgical site infection: Implications for estimating risks and costs

Christopher S. Hollenbeak, Melissa M. Boltz, Lucas E. Nikkel, Eric Schaefer, Gail Ortenzi, Peter W. Dillon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. Electronic measures of surgical site infections (SSIs) are being used more frequently in place of labor-intensive measures. This study compares performance characteristics of 2 electronic measures of SSIs with a clinical measure and studies the implications of using electronic measures to estimate risk factors and costs of SSIs among surgery patients. methods. Data included 1,066 general and vascular surgery patients at a single academic center between 2007 and 2008. Clinical data were from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, which includes a nurse-derived measure of SSI. We compared the NSQIP SSI measure with 2 electronic measures of SSI: MedMined Nosocomial Infection Marker (NIM) and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) coding for SSIs. We compared infection rates for each measure, estimated sensitivity and specificity of electronic measures, compared effects of SSI measures on risk factors for mortality using logistic regression, and compared estimated costs of SSIs for measures using linear regression. results. SSIs were observed in 8.8% of patients according to the NSQIP definition, 2.6% of patients according to the NIM definition, and 5.8% according to the ICD-9 definition. Logistic regression for each SSI measure revealed large differences in estimated risk factors. NIM and ICD-9 measures overestimated the cost of SSIs by 134% and 33%, respectively. conclusions. Caution should be taken when relying on electronic measures for SSI surveillance and when estimating risk and costs attributable to SSIs. Electronic measures are convenient, but in this data set they did not correlate well with a clinical measure of infection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)784-790
Number of pages7
JournalInfection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
Volume32
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2011

Fingerprint

Surgical Wound Infection
Costs and Cost Analysis
International Classification of Diseases
Cross Infection
Quality Improvement
Logistic Models
Infection

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Epidemiology
  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

@article{79f27532349049dbafd6e5213f3d2d9a,
title = "Electronic measures of surgical site infection: Implications for estimating risks and costs",
abstract = "Objective. Electronic measures of surgical site infections (SSIs) are being used more frequently in place of labor-intensive measures. This study compares performance characteristics of 2 electronic measures of SSIs with a clinical measure and studies the implications of using electronic measures to estimate risk factors and costs of SSIs among surgery patients. methods. Data included 1,066 general and vascular surgery patients at a single academic center between 2007 and 2008. Clinical data were from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, which includes a nurse-derived measure of SSI. We compared the NSQIP SSI measure with 2 electronic measures of SSI: MedMined Nosocomial Infection Marker (NIM) and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) coding for SSIs. We compared infection rates for each measure, estimated sensitivity and specificity of electronic measures, compared effects of SSI measures on risk factors for mortality using logistic regression, and compared estimated costs of SSIs for measures using linear regression. results. SSIs were observed in 8.8{\%} of patients according to the NSQIP definition, 2.6{\%} of patients according to the NIM definition, and 5.8{\%} according to the ICD-9 definition. Logistic regression for each SSI measure revealed large differences in estimated risk factors. NIM and ICD-9 measures overestimated the cost of SSIs by 134{\%} and 33{\%}, respectively. conclusions. Caution should be taken when relying on electronic measures for SSI surveillance and when estimating risk and costs attributable to SSIs. Electronic measures are convenient, but in this data set they did not correlate well with a clinical measure of infection.",
author = "Hollenbeak, {Christopher S.} and Boltz, {Melissa M.} and Nikkel, {Lucas E.} and Eric Schaefer and Gail Ortenzi and Dillon, {Peter W.}",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/660870",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "784--790",
journal = "Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology",
issn = "0899-823X",
publisher = "University of Chicago Press",
number = "8",

}

Electronic measures of surgical site infection : Implications for estimating risks and costs. / Hollenbeak, Christopher S.; Boltz, Melissa M.; Nikkel, Lucas E.; Schaefer, Eric; Ortenzi, Gail; Dillon, Peter W.

In: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Vol. 32, No. 8, 01.08.2011, p. 784-790.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electronic measures of surgical site infection

T2 - Implications for estimating risks and costs

AU - Hollenbeak, Christopher S.

AU - Boltz, Melissa M.

AU - Nikkel, Lucas E.

AU - Schaefer, Eric

AU - Ortenzi, Gail

AU - Dillon, Peter W.

PY - 2011/8/1

Y1 - 2011/8/1

N2 - Objective. Electronic measures of surgical site infections (SSIs) are being used more frequently in place of labor-intensive measures. This study compares performance characteristics of 2 electronic measures of SSIs with a clinical measure and studies the implications of using electronic measures to estimate risk factors and costs of SSIs among surgery patients. methods. Data included 1,066 general and vascular surgery patients at a single academic center between 2007 and 2008. Clinical data were from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, which includes a nurse-derived measure of SSI. We compared the NSQIP SSI measure with 2 electronic measures of SSI: MedMined Nosocomial Infection Marker (NIM) and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) coding for SSIs. We compared infection rates for each measure, estimated sensitivity and specificity of electronic measures, compared effects of SSI measures on risk factors for mortality using logistic regression, and compared estimated costs of SSIs for measures using linear regression. results. SSIs were observed in 8.8% of patients according to the NSQIP definition, 2.6% of patients according to the NIM definition, and 5.8% according to the ICD-9 definition. Logistic regression for each SSI measure revealed large differences in estimated risk factors. NIM and ICD-9 measures overestimated the cost of SSIs by 134% and 33%, respectively. conclusions. Caution should be taken when relying on electronic measures for SSI surveillance and when estimating risk and costs attributable to SSIs. Electronic measures are convenient, but in this data set they did not correlate well with a clinical measure of infection.

AB - Objective. Electronic measures of surgical site infections (SSIs) are being used more frequently in place of labor-intensive measures. This study compares performance characteristics of 2 electronic measures of SSIs with a clinical measure and studies the implications of using electronic measures to estimate risk factors and costs of SSIs among surgery patients. methods. Data included 1,066 general and vascular surgery patients at a single academic center between 2007 and 2008. Clinical data were from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, which includes a nurse-derived measure of SSI. We compared the NSQIP SSI measure with 2 electronic measures of SSI: MedMined Nosocomial Infection Marker (NIM) and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) coding for SSIs. We compared infection rates for each measure, estimated sensitivity and specificity of electronic measures, compared effects of SSI measures on risk factors for mortality using logistic regression, and compared estimated costs of SSIs for measures using linear regression. results. SSIs were observed in 8.8% of patients according to the NSQIP definition, 2.6% of patients according to the NIM definition, and 5.8% according to the ICD-9 definition. Logistic regression for each SSI measure revealed large differences in estimated risk factors. NIM and ICD-9 measures overestimated the cost of SSIs by 134% and 33%, respectively. conclusions. Caution should be taken when relying on electronic measures for SSI surveillance and when estimating risk and costs attributable to SSIs. Electronic measures are convenient, but in this data set they did not correlate well with a clinical measure of infection.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960732272&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960732272&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/660870

DO - 10.1086/660870

M3 - Article

C2 - 21768762

AN - SCOPUS:79960732272

VL - 32

SP - 784

EP - 790

JO - Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology

JF - Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology

SN - 0899-823X

IS - 8

ER -