Embracing Causal Complexity: The Emergence of a Neo-Configurational Perspective

Vilmos F. Misangyi, Thomas Greckhamer, Santi Furnari, Peer C. Fiss, Donal Crilly, Ruth Aguilera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

95 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Causal complexity has long been recognized as a ubiquitous feature underlying organizational phenomena, yet current theories and methodologies in management are for the most part not well-suited to its direct study. The introduction of the Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) configurational approach has led to a reinvigoration of configurational theory that embraces causal complexity explicitly. We argue that the burgeoning research using QCA represents more than a novel methodology; it constitutes the emergence of a neo-configurational perspective to the study of management and organizations that enables a fine-grained conceptualization and empirical investigation of causal complexity through the logic of set theory. In this article, we identify four foundational elements that characterize this emerging neo-configurational perspective: (a) conceptualizing cases as set theoretic configurations, (b) calibrating cases’ memberships into sets, (c) viewing causality in terms of necessity and sufficiency relations between sets, and (d) conducting counterfactual analysis of unobserved configurations. We then present a comprehensive review of the use of QCA in management studies that aims to capture the evolution of the neo-configurational perspective among management scholars. We close with a discussion of a research agenda that can further this neo-configurational approach and thereby shift the attention of management research away from a focus on net effects and towards examining causal complexity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)255-282
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Management
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Qualitative comparative analysis
Configurational approach
Methodology
Management studies
Empirical investigation
Sufficiency
Conceptualization
Causality
Research agenda
Logic
Management research
Counterfactual analysis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Finance
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Misangyi, Vilmos F. ; Greckhamer, Thomas ; Furnari, Santi ; Fiss, Peer C. ; Crilly, Donal ; Aguilera, Ruth. / Embracing Causal Complexity : The Emergence of a Neo-Configurational Perspective. In: Journal of Management. 2016 ; Vol. 43, No. 1. pp. 255-282.
@article{48ee483de04041ae8670ca45974b2f53,
title = "Embracing Causal Complexity: The Emergence of a Neo-Configurational Perspective",
abstract = "Causal complexity has long been recognized as a ubiquitous feature underlying organizational phenomena, yet current theories and methodologies in management are for the most part not well-suited to its direct study. The introduction of the Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) configurational approach has led to a reinvigoration of configurational theory that embraces causal complexity explicitly. We argue that the burgeoning research using QCA represents more than a novel methodology; it constitutes the emergence of a neo-configurational perspective to the study of management and organizations that enables a fine-grained conceptualization and empirical investigation of causal complexity through the logic of set theory. In this article, we identify four foundational elements that characterize this emerging neo-configurational perspective: (a) conceptualizing cases as set theoretic configurations, (b) calibrating cases’ memberships into sets, (c) viewing causality in terms of necessity and sufficiency relations between sets, and (d) conducting counterfactual analysis of unobserved configurations. We then present a comprehensive review of the use of QCA in management studies that aims to capture the evolution of the neo-configurational perspective among management scholars. We close with a discussion of a research agenda that can further this neo-configurational approach and thereby shift the attention of management research away from a focus on net effects and towards examining causal complexity.",
author = "Misangyi, {Vilmos F.} and Thomas Greckhamer and Santi Furnari and Fiss, {Peer C.} and Donal Crilly and Ruth Aguilera",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0149206316679252",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "255--282",
journal = "Journal of Management",
issn = "0149-2063",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Misangyi, VF, Greckhamer, T, Furnari, S, Fiss, PC, Crilly, D & Aguilera, R 2016, 'Embracing Causal Complexity: The Emergence of a Neo-Configurational Perspective', Journal of Management, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 255-282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316679252

Embracing Causal Complexity : The Emergence of a Neo-Configurational Perspective. / Misangyi, Vilmos F.; Greckhamer, Thomas; Furnari, Santi; Fiss, Peer C.; Crilly, Donal; Aguilera, Ruth.

In: Journal of Management, Vol. 43, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 255-282.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Embracing Causal Complexity

T2 - The Emergence of a Neo-Configurational Perspective

AU - Misangyi, Vilmos F.

AU - Greckhamer, Thomas

AU - Furnari, Santi

AU - Fiss, Peer C.

AU - Crilly, Donal

AU - Aguilera, Ruth

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Causal complexity has long been recognized as a ubiquitous feature underlying organizational phenomena, yet current theories and methodologies in management are for the most part not well-suited to its direct study. The introduction of the Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) configurational approach has led to a reinvigoration of configurational theory that embraces causal complexity explicitly. We argue that the burgeoning research using QCA represents more than a novel methodology; it constitutes the emergence of a neo-configurational perspective to the study of management and organizations that enables a fine-grained conceptualization and empirical investigation of causal complexity through the logic of set theory. In this article, we identify four foundational elements that characterize this emerging neo-configurational perspective: (a) conceptualizing cases as set theoretic configurations, (b) calibrating cases’ memberships into sets, (c) viewing causality in terms of necessity and sufficiency relations between sets, and (d) conducting counterfactual analysis of unobserved configurations. We then present a comprehensive review of the use of QCA in management studies that aims to capture the evolution of the neo-configurational perspective among management scholars. We close with a discussion of a research agenda that can further this neo-configurational approach and thereby shift the attention of management research away from a focus on net effects and towards examining causal complexity.

AB - Causal complexity has long been recognized as a ubiquitous feature underlying organizational phenomena, yet current theories and methodologies in management are for the most part not well-suited to its direct study. The introduction of the Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) configurational approach has led to a reinvigoration of configurational theory that embraces causal complexity explicitly. We argue that the burgeoning research using QCA represents more than a novel methodology; it constitutes the emergence of a neo-configurational perspective to the study of management and organizations that enables a fine-grained conceptualization and empirical investigation of causal complexity through the logic of set theory. In this article, we identify four foundational elements that characterize this emerging neo-configurational perspective: (a) conceptualizing cases as set theoretic configurations, (b) calibrating cases’ memberships into sets, (c) viewing causality in terms of necessity and sufficiency relations between sets, and (d) conducting counterfactual analysis of unobserved configurations. We then present a comprehensive review of the use of QCA in management studies that aims to capture the evolution of the neo-configurational perspective among management scholars. We close with a discussion of a research agenda that can further this neo-configurational approach and thereby shift the attention of management research away from a focus on net effects and towards examining causal complexity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85003890229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85003890229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0149206316679252

DO - 10.1177/0149206316679252

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85003890229

VL - 43

SP - 255

EP - 282

JO - Journal of Management

JF - Journal of Management

SN - 0149-2063

IS - 1

ER -