Emergent properties of sustainability: Using agroecosystem indicators within spatial and temporal frameworks

Veronika Vazhnik, Esther S. Parish, Virginia H. Dale, Keith L. Kline, Thomas Lehman Richard

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

This study reviews sustainability indicators for production of bioenergy crops and assesses the applicability of those indicators at diverse spatial and temporal extents. Various research groups from agricultural, urban development, life cycle assessment and bioenergy domains have generated extensive checklists of sustainability indicators, separating them into environmental, economic and social measurements. The applicability of those measurements depends not only on the crop type and the geographic region where the assessment is done, but also on the spatial resolution and time frame of the assessment. A detailed assessment of agronomic and environmental indicators is possible at a farm, field, or sub-field scale, but few social impact indicators can be measured at that resolution. County-level assessments can introduce additional social and economic impact variables, but can also make it difficult to discriminate field-level impacts like farm profitability or soil quality. Time introduces additional complexity since different measurements may be needed to assess daily, seasonal and multi-year effects. This study uses the example of farm landscape planning and decision support to illustrate such dimension-dependent choices of indicators. Results indicate that assessment boundaries with respect to space and time play a large role in evaluating agroecosystem sustainability. Recognition of those influences is important for improving stakeholder engagement, technical innovation, and policy support.

Original languageEnglish (US)
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018
EventASABE 2018 Annual International Meeting - Detroit, United States
Duration: Jul 29 2018Aug 1 2018

Other

OtherASABE 2018 Annual International Meeting
CountryUnited States
CityDetroit
Period7/29/188/1/18

Fingerprint

agroecosystems
Farms
Sustainable development
social impact
Crops
farm profitability
farms
Economics
life cycle assessment
environmental indicators
environmental economics
urban development
energy crops
bioenergy
economic impact
stakeholders
space and time
Life cycle
soil quality
Profitability

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Bioengineering
  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Cite this

Vazhnik, V., Parish, E. S., Dale, V. H., Kline, K. L., & Richard, T. L. (2018). Emergent properties of sustainability: Using agroecosystem indicators within spatial and temporal frameworks. Paper presented at ASABE 2018 Annual International Meeting, Detroit, United States. https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.201800439
Vazhnik, Veronika ; Parish, Esther S. ; Dale, Virginia H. ; Kline, Keith L. ; Richard, Thomas Lehman. / Emergent properties of sustainability : Using agroecosystem indicators within spatial and temporal frameworks. Paper presented at ASABE 2018 Annual International Meeting, Detroit, United States.
@conference{6017ae1c2bae4ca3aa2c09b58b3fcc5f,
title = "Emergent properties of sustainability: Using agroecosystem indicators within spatial and temporal frameworks",
abstract = "This study reviews sustainability indicators for production of bioenergy crops and assesses the applicability of those indicators at diverse spatial and temporal extents. Various research groups from agricultural, urban development, life cycle assessment and bioenergy domains have generated extensive checklists of sustainability indicators, separating them into environmental, economic and social measurements. The applicability of those measurements depends not only on the crop type and the geographic region where the assessment is done, but also on the spatial resolution and time frame of the assessment. A detailed assessment of agronomic and environmental indicators is possible at a farm, field, or sub-field scale, but few social impact indicators can be measured at that resolution. County-level assessments can introduce additional social and economic impact variables, but can also make it difficult to discriminate field-level impacts like farm profitability or soil quality. Time introduces additional complexity since different measurements may be needed to assess daily, seasonal and multi-year effects. This study uses the example of farm landscape planning and decision support to illustrate such dimension-dependent choices of indicators. Results indicate that assessment boundaries with respect to space and time play a large role in evaluating agroecosystem sustainability. Recognition of those influences is important for improving stakeholder engagement, technical innovation, and policy support.",
author = "Veronika Vazhnik and Parish, {Esther S.} and Dale, {Virginia H.} and Kline, {Keith L.} and Richard, {Thomas Lehman}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.13031/aim.201800439",
language = "English (US)",
note = "ASABE 2018 Annual International Meeting ; Conference date: 29-07-2018 Through 01-08-2018",

}

Vazhnik, V, Parish, ES, Dale, VH, Kline, KL & Richard, TL 2018, 'Emergent properties of sustainability: Using agroecosystem indicators within spatial and temporal frameworks', Paper presented at ASABE 2018 Annual International Meeting, Detroit, United States, 7/29/18 - 8/1/18. https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.201800439

Emergent properties of sustainability : Using agroecosystem indicators within spatial and temporal frameworks. / Vazhnik, Veronika; Parish, Esther S.; Dale, Virginia H.; Kline, Keith L.; Richard, Thomas Lehman.

2018. Paper presented at ASABE 2018 Annual International Meeting, Detroit, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - Emergent properties of sustainability

T2 - Using agroecosystem indicators within spatial and temporal frameworks

AU - Vazhnik, Veronika

AU - Parish, Esther S.

AU - Dale, Virginia H.

AU - Kline, Keith L.

AU - Richard, Thomas Lehman

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - This study reviews sustainability indicators for production of bioenergy crops and assesses the applicability of those indicators at diverse spatial and temporal extents. Various research groups from agricultural, urban development, life cycle assessment and bioenergy domains have generated extensive checklists of sustainability indicators, separating them into environmental, economic and social measurements. The applicability of those measurements depends not only on the crop type and the geographic region where the assessment is done, but also on the spatial resolution and time frame of the assessment. A detailed assessment of agronomic and environmental indicators is possible at a farm, field, or sub-field scale, but few social impact indicators can be measured at that resolution. County-level assessments can introduce additional social and economic impact variables, but can also make it difficult to discriminate field-level impacts like farm profitability or soil quality. Time introduces additional complexity since different measurements may be needed to assess daily, seasonal and multi-year effects. This study uses the example of farm landscape planning and decision support to illustrate such dimension-dependent choices of indicators. Results indicate that assessment boundaries with respect to space and time play a large role in evaluating agroecosystem sustainability. Recognition of those influences is important for improving stakeholder engagement, technical innovation, and policy support.

AB - This study reviews sustainability indicators for production of bioenergy crops and assesses the applicability of those indicators at diverse spatial and temporal extents. Various research groups from agricultural, urban development, life cycle assessment and bioenergy domains have generated extensive checklists of sustainability indicators, separating them into environmental, economic and social measurements. The applicability of those measurements depends not only on the crop type and the geographic region where the assessment is done, but also on the spatial resolution and time frame of the assessment. A detailed assessment of agronomic and environmental indicators is possible at a farm, field, or sub-field scale, but few social impact indicators can be measured at that resolution. County-level assessments can introduce additional social and economic impact variables, but can also make it difficult to discriminate field-level impacts like farm profitability or soil quality. Time introduces additional complexity since different measurements may be needed to assess daily, seasonal and multi-year effects. This study uses the example of farm landscape planning and decision support to illustrate such dimension-dependent choices of indicators. Results indicate that assessment boundaries with respect to space and time play a large role in evaluating agroecosystem sustainability. Recognition of those influences is important for improving stakeholder engagement, technical innovation, and policy support.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054164198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054164198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.13031/aim.201800439

DO - 10.13031/aim.201800439

M3 - Paper

AN - SCOPUS:85054164198

ER -

Vazhnik V, Parish ES, Dale VH, Kline KL, Richard TL. Emergent properties of sustainability: Using agroecosystem indicators within spatial and temporal frameworks. 2018. Paper presented at ASABE 2018 Annual International Meeting, Detroit, United States. https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.201800439