Emerging Nutrition Science on Fatty Acids and Cardiovascular Disease: Nutritionists' Perspectives

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent dietary guidance for heart health recommends a reduction (by ~50%) in saturated fatty acid (SFA) intake to reduce LDL cholesterol and to decrease risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommends substituting unsaturated fat [both polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs and MUFAs, respectively)] for SFAs. There are many dietary options that can be implemented to replace SFAs, given the different sources of unsaturated fats in the food supply. Compelling evidence exists for the cardioprotective benefits of n-3 (v-3) PUFAs, both marine- and plant-derived. In addition, the evidence of cardioprotective benefits of n-6 (v-6) PUFAs is strong, whereas that for MUFAs is mixed, although there is emerging evidence of benefits. Quantitatively, lowering SFAs by 50% will require, in part, substituting food sources of n-6 and n-3 PUFAs and MUFAs for food sources of SFAs. The use of n-3 PUFAs as a replacement for SFAs will result in a shortfall in reaching the SFA goal because of the relatively low amounts that can be incorporated in the diet, even with very high n-3 PUFA substitution. SFAs also can be replaced with dietary carbohydrate and/or protein. Replacing SFAs with carbohydrate, specifically refined sources, however, has little impact on reducing CVD risk. There is evidence about the health benefits of dietary protein on CVD risk, which merits study. Dietary guidelines have advanced considerably with the "replacement of SFA with unsaturated fat message" instead of recommending decreasing SFAs alone. A key question that remains is what is the optimal mix of macronutrients to maximally reduce CVD risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)326S-337S
JournalAdvances in Nutrition
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Nutritional Sciences
nutrition science
Nutritionists
nutritionists
Unsaturated Fats
cardiovascular diseases
Omega-3 Fatty Acids
Cardiovascular Diseases
Fatty Acids
fatty acids
saturated fatty acids
Nutrition Policy
Dietary Guidelines
Dietary Proteins
Dietary Carbohydrates
Food
Monounsaturated Fatty Acids
dietary carbohydrate
Food Supply
dietary recommendations

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Food Science
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

@article{644334ddeec14bdba523aae184e9056d,
title = "Emerging Nutrition Science on Fatty Acids and Cardiovascular Disease: Nutritionists' Perspectives",
abstract = "Recent dietary guidance for heart health recommends a reduction (by ~50{\%}) in saturated fatty acid (SFA) intake to reduce LDL cholesterol and to decrease risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommends substituting unsaturated fat [both polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs and MUFAs, respectively)] for SFAs. There are many dietary options that can be implemented to replace SFAs, given the different sources of unsaturated fats in the food supply. Compelling evidence exists for the cardioprotective benefits of n-3 (v-3) PUFAs, both marine- and plant-derived. In addition, the evidence of cardioprotective benefits of n-6 (v-6) PUFAs is strong, whereas that for MUFAs is mixed, although there is emerging evidence of benefits. Quantitatively, lowering SFAs by 50{\%} will require, in part, substituting food sources of n-6 and n-3 PUFAs and MUFAs for food sources of SFAs. The use of n-3 PUFAs as a replacement for SFAs will result in a shortfall in reaching the SFA goal because of the relatively low amounts that can be incorporated in the diet, even with very high n-3 PUFA substitution. SFAs also can be replaced with dietary carbohydrate and/or protein. Replacing SFAs with carbohydrate, specifically refined sources, however, has little impact on reducing CVD risk. There is evidence about the health benefits of dietary protein on CVD risk, which merits study. Dietary guidelines have advanced considerably with the {"}replacement of SFA with unsaturated fat message{"} instead of recommending decreasing SFAs alone. A key question that remains is what is the optimal mix of macronutrients to maximally reduce CVD risk.",
author = "Kris-Etherton, {Penny Margaret} and Fleming, {Jennifer Anne}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3945/an.114.006981",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "326S--337S",
journal = "Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)",
issn = "2161-8313",
publisher = "American Society for Nutrition",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emerging Nutrition Science on Fatty Acids and Cardiovascular Disease

T2 - Nutritionists' Perspectives

AU - Kris-Etherton, Penny Margaret

AU - Fleming, Jennifer Anne

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Recent dietary guidance for heart health recommends a reduction (by ~50%) in saturated fatty acid (SFA) intake to reduce LDL cholesterol and to decrease risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommends substituting unsaturated fat [both polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs and MUFAs, respectively)] for SFAs. There are many dietary options that can be implemented to replace SFAs, given the different sources of unsaturated fats in the food supply. Compelling evidence exists for the cardioprotective benefits of n-3 (v-3) PUFAs, both marine- and plant-derived. In addition, the evidence of cardioprotective benefits of n-6 (v-6) PUFAs is strong, whereas that for MUFAs is mixed, although there is emerging evidence of benefits. Quantitatively, lowering SFAs by 50% will require, in part, substituting food sources of n-6 and n-3 PUFAs and MUFAs for food sources of SFAs. The use of n-3 PUFAs as a replacement for SFAs will result in a shortfall in reaching the SFA goal because of the relatively low amounts that can be incorporated in the diet, even with very high n-3 PUFA substitution. SFAs also can be replaced with dietary carbohydrate and/or protein. Replacing SFAs with carbohydrate, specifically refined sources, however, has little impact on reducing CVD risk. There is evidence about the health benefits of dietary protein on CVD risk, which merits study. Dietary guidelines have advanced considerably with the "replacement of SFA with unsaturated fat message" instead of recommending decreasing SFAs alone. A key question that remains is what is the optimal mix of macronutrients to maximally reduce CVD risk.

AB - Recent dietary guidance for heart health recommends a reduction (by ~50%) in saturated fatty acid (SFA) intake to reduce LDL cholesterol and to decrease risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommends substituting unsaturated fat [both polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs and MUFAs, respectively)] for SFAs. There are many dietary options that can be implemented to replace SFAs, given the different sources of unsaturated fats in the food supply. Compelling evidence exists for the cardioprotective benefits of n-3 (v-3) PUFAs, both marine- and plant-derived. In addition, the evidence of cardioprotective benefits of n-6 (v-6) PUFAs is strong, whereas that for MUFAs is mixed, although there is emerging evidence of benefits. Quantitatively, lowering SFAs by 50% will require, in part, substituting food sources of n-6 and n-3 PUFAs and MUFAs for food sources of SFAs. The use of n-3 PUFAs as a replacement for SFAs will result in a shortfall in reaching the SFA goal because of the relatively low amounts that can be incorporated in the diet, even with very high n-3 PUFA substitution. SFAs also can be replaced with dietary carbohydrate and/or protein. Replacing SFAs with carbohydrate, specifically refined sources, however, has little impact on reducing CVD risk. There is evidence about the health benefits of dietary protein on CVD risk, which merits study. Dietary guidelines have advanced considerably with the "replacement of SFA with unsaturated fat message" instead of recommending decreasing SFAs alone. A key question that remains is what is the optimal mix of macronutrients to maximally reduce CVD risk.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84950277919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84950277919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3945/an.114.006981

DO - 10.3945/an.114.006981

M3 - Article

C2 - 25979506

AN - SCOPUS:84950277919

VL - 6

SP - 326S-337S

JO - Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)

JF - Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)

SN - 2161-8313

IS - 3

ER -