Emotional aspects of peer relations among children in rural Nepal

Pamela Marie Cole, Alisha R. Walker, Mukta Sing Lama-Tamang

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The quality of relationships between any two people in any culture determines and is determined by emotional factors. Attraction, rejection, attachment, conflict, trust, jealousy, and intimacy all reflect emotional dimensions of relationships. Friendships and peer interactions require emotional skill and also contribute to children’s general social and emotional adjustment (Parker et al., 1995). Peer relations are thought to be unique because they are formed with persons who are close in age and developmental status and are more egalitarian than other relationships (Hartup & Moore, 1990; Ladd, 1988). Friendships are regarded as voluntary and based on a mutual decision to form a relationship (Ladd, 1988; Rubin, Bukowski, & Parker, 1998). Peers teach unique skills to each other (e.g., negotiation and conflict management), when neither partner is the designated authority. Therefore, peer relationships provide a context for behaving in ways that might not exist within the family (Hartup & Sancilio, 1986; Sullivan, 1953). The definition of peers as nonfamilial, reciprocal relationships of choice with persons close in age requires some additional consideration due to cultural variations in what constitutes a family and a peer, and in what constitutes choice and reciprocity. In the small Himalayan kingdom of Nepal, all persons, including peers, are regarded in familial terms. Moreover, among persons of the same age, every relationship is hierarchical; even children determine and behave according to their rank relative to each other.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationPeer Relationships in Cultural Context
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages148-169
Number of pages22
ISBN (Electronic)9780511499739
ISBN (Print)9780521842075
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006

Fingerprint

Nepal
Jealousy
Social Adjustment
Negotiating
Conflict (Psychology)

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Cole, P. M., Walker, A. R., & Lama-Tamang, M. S. (2006). Emotional aspects of peer relations among children in rural Nepal. In Peer Relationships in Cultural Context (pp. 148-169). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499739.007
Cole, Pamela Marie ; Walker, Alisha R. ; Lama-Tamang, Mukta Sing. / Emotional aspects of peer relations among children in rural Nepal. Peer Relationships in Cultural Context. Cambridge University Press, 2006. pp. 148-169
@inbook{732d5b3aee6f434ab63fb3c98d4e6275,
title = "Emotional aspects of peer relations among children in rural Nepal",
abstract = "The quality of relationships between any two people in any culture determines and is determined by emotional factors. Attraction, rejection, attachment, conflict, trust, jealousy, and intimacy all reflect emotional dimensions of relationships. Friendships and peer interactions require emotional skill and also contribute to children’s general social and emotional adjustment (Parker et al., 1995). Peer relations are thought to be unique because they are formed with persons who are close in age and developmental status and are more egalitarian than other relationships (Hartup & Moore, 1990; Ladd, 1988). Friendships are regarded as voluntary and based on a mutual decision to form a relationship (Ladd, 1988; Rubin, Bukowski, & Parker, 1998). Peers teach unique skills to each other (e.g., negotiation and conflict management), when neither partner is the designated authority. Therefore, peer relationships provide a context for behaving in ways that might not exist within the family (Hartup & Sancilio, 1986; Sullivan, 1953). The definition of peers as nonfamilial, reciprocal relationships of choice with persons close in age requires some additional consideration due to cultural variations in what constitutes a family and a peer, and in what constitutes choice and reciprocity. In the small Himalayan kingdom of Nepal, all persons, including peers, are regarded in familial terms. Moreover, among persons of the same age, every relationship is hierarchical; even children determine and behave according to their rank relative to each other.",
author = "Cole, {Pamela Marie} and Walker, {Alisha R.} and Lama-Tamang, {Mukta Sing}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511499739.007",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780521842075",
pages = "148--169",
booktitle = "Peer Relationships in Cultural Context",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Cole, PM, Walker, AR & Lama-Tamang, MS 2006, Emotional aspects of peer relations among children in rural Nepal. in Peer Relationships in Cultural Context. Cambridge University Press, pp. 148-169. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499739.007

Emotional aspects of peer relations among children in rural Nepal. / Cole, Pamela Marie; Walker, Alisha R.; Lama-Tamang, Mukta Sing.

Peer Relationships in Cultural Context. Cambridge University Press, 2006. p. 148-169.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Emotional aspects of peer relations among children in rural Nepal

AU - Cole, Pamela Marie

AU - Walker, Alisha R.

AU - Lama-Tamang, Mukta Sing

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - The quality of relationships between any two people in any culture determines and is determined by emotional factors. Attraction, rejection, attachment, conflict, trust, jealousy, and intimacy all reflect emotional dimensions of relationships. Friendships and peer interactions require emotional skill and also contribute to children’s general social and emotional adjustment (Parker et al., 1995). Peer relations are thought to be unique because they are formed with persons who are close in age and developmental status and are more egalitarian than other relationships (Hartup & Moore, 1990; Ladd, 1988). Friendships are regarded as voluntary and based on a mutual decision to form a relationship (Ladd, 1988; Rubin, Bukowski, & Parker, 1998). Peers teach unique skills to each other (e.g., negotiation and conflict management), when neither partner is the designated authority. Therefore, peer relationships provide a context for behaving in ways that might not exist within the family (Hartup & Sancilio, 1986; Sullivan, 1953). The definition of peers as nonfamilial, reciprocal relationships of choice with persons close in age requires some additional consideration due to cultural variations in what constitutes a family and a peer, and in what constitutes choice and reciprocity. In the small Himalayan kingdom of Nepal, all persons, including peers, are regarded in familial terms. Moreover, among persons of the same age, every relationship is hierarchical; even children determine and behave according to their rank relative to each other.

AB - The quality of relationships between any two people in any culture determines and is determined by emotional factors. Attraction, rejection, attachment, conflict, trust, jealousy, and intimacy all reflect emotional dimensions of relationships. Friendships and peer interactions require emotional skill and also contribute to children’s general social and emotional adjustment (Parker et al., 1995). Peer relations are thought to be unique because they are formed with persons who are close in age and developmental status and are more egalitarian than other relationships (Hartup & Moore, 1990; Ladd, 1988). Friendships are regarded as voluntary and based on a mutual decision to form a relationship (Ladd, 1988; Rubin, Bukowski, & Parker, 1998). Peers teach unique skills to each other (e.g., negotiation and conflict management), when neither partner is the designated authority. Therefore, peer relationships provide a context for behaving in ways that might not exist within the family (Hartup & Sancilio, 1986; Sullivan, 1953). The definition of peers as nonfamilial, reciprocal relationships of choice with persons close in age requires some additional consideration due to cultural variations in what constitutes a family and a peer, and in what constitutes choice and reciprocity. In the small Himalayan kingdom of Nepal, all persons, including peers, are regarded in familial terms. Moreover, among persons of the same age, every relationship is hierarchical; even children determine and behave according to their rank relative to each other.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927036241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927036241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511499739.007

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511499739.007

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84927036241

SN - 9780521842075

SP - 148

EP - 169

BT - Peer Relationships in Cultural Context

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -

Cole PM, Walker AR, Lama-Tamang MS. Emotional aspects of peer relations among children in rural Nepal. In Peer Relationships in Cultural Context. Cambridge University Press. 2006. p. 148-169 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499739.007