Emotional labor threatens decent work: A proposal to eradicate emotional display rules

Alicia A. Grandey, Deborah Rupp, William N. Brice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Emotional labor-the management of emotional displays as part of one's work role-has emerged as a growth area of study within organizational behavior and customer service research. In this article, we call attention to the human costs of "service with a smile" requirements with little benefits. We first review the evidence showing that requiring positive emotions from employees induces dissonance and depleted resources, which hinders task performance and threatens well-being. We articulate how formalized emotion display requirements limit self-determination by threatening the autonomy, competence, and belongingness needs of employees. Further, via an organizational justice lens, we argue that emotional labor is an unfair labor practice because employees in such circumstances are (1) undervalued by the organization (constituting distributive injustice); (2) disrespected by customers (constituting interactional injustice); and (3) self-undermined by organizational policies (constituting procedural injustice). We then argue for bringing light to the dark side of emotional labor with a "modest proposal": Organizations and customers should abandon formalized emotion display expectations and replace such efforts with more humanistic practices that support and value employees, engendering positive climates and an authentically positive workforce.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)770-785
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Organizational Behavior
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015

Fingerprint

Emotions
employee
labor
emotion
customer
Organizations
Organizational Policy
Personal Autonomy
Social Justice
Task Performance and Analysis
Climate
Mental Competency
Lenses
organizational behavior
self-determination
Light
Costs and Cost Analysis
autonomy
well-being
justice

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Psychology(all)
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

@article{f6a814dc3de5429eb3b30537d71f708f,
title = "Emotional labor threatens decent work: A proposal to eradicate emotional display rules",
abstract = "Emotional labor-the management of emotional displays as part of one's work role-has emerged as a growth area of study within organizational behavior and customer service research. In this article, we call attention to the human costs of {"}service with a smile{"} requirements with little benefits. We first review the evidence showing that requiring positive emotions from employees induces dissonance and depleted resources, which hinders task performance and threatens well-being. We articulate how formalized emotion display requirements limit self-determination by threatening the autonomy, competence, and belongingness needs of employees. Further, via an organizational justice lens, we argue that emotional labor is an unfair labor practice because employees in such circumstances are (1) undervalued by the organization (constituting distributive injustice); (2) disrespected by customers (constituting interactional injustice); and (3) self-undermined by organizational policies (constituting procedural injustice). We then argue for bringing light to the dark side of emotional labor with a {"}modest proposal{"}: Organizations and customers should abandon formalized emotion display expectations and replace such efforts with more humanistic practices that support and value employees, engendering positive climates and an authentically positive workforce.",
author = "Grandey, {Alicia A.} and Deborah Rupp and Brice, {William N.}",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/job.2020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "770--785",
journal = "Journal of Organizational Behavior",
issn = "0894-3796",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "6",

}

Emotional labor threatens decent work : A proposal to eradicate emotional display rules. / Grandey, Alicia A.; Rupp, Deborah; Brice, William N.

In: Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 36, No. 6, 01.08.2015, p. 770-785.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emotional labor threatens decent work

T2 - A proposal to eradicate emotional display rules

AU - Grandey, Alicia A.

AU - Rupp, Deborah

AU - Brice, William N.

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - Emotional labor-the management of emotional displays as part of one's work role-has emerged as a growth area of study within organizational behavior and customer service research. In this article, we call attention to the human costs of "service with a smile" requirements with little benefits. We first review the evidence showing that requiring positive emotions from employees induces dissonance and depleted resources, which hinders task performance and threatens well-being. We articulate how formalized emotion display requirements limit self-determination by threatening the autonomy, competence, and belongingness needs of employees. Further, via an organizational justice lens, we argue that emotional labor is an unfair labor practice because employees in such circumstances are (1) undervalued by the organization (constituting distributive injustice); (2) disrespected by customers (constituting interactional injustice); and (3) self-undermined by organizational policies (constituting procedural injustice). We then argue for bringing light to the dark side of emotional labor with a "modest proposal": Organizations and customers should abandon formalized emotion display expectations and replace such efforts with more humanistic practices that support and value employees, engendering positive climates and an authentically positive workforce.

AB - Emotional labor-the management of emotional displays as part of one's work role-has emerged as a growth area of study within organizational behavior and customer service research. In this article, we call attention to the human costs of "service with a smile" requirements with little benefits. We first review the evidence showing that requiring positive emotions from employees induces dissonance and depleted resources, which hinders task performance and threatens well-being. We articulate how formalized emotion display requirements limit self-determination by threatening the autonomy, competence, and belongingness needs of employees. Further, via an organizational justice lens, we argue that emotional labor is an unfair labor practice because employees in such circumstances are (1) undervalued by the organization (constituting distributive injustice); (2) disrespected by customers (constituting interactional injustice); and (3) self-undermined by organizational policies (constituting procedural injustice). We then argue for bringing light to the dark side of emotional labor with a "modest proposal": Organizations and customers should abandon formalized emotion display expectations and replace such efforts with more humanistic practices that support and value employees, engendering positive climates and an authentically positive workforce.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938989345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938989345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/job.2020

DO - 10.1002/job.2020

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84938989345

VL - 36

SP - 770

EP - 785

JO - Journal of Organizational Behavior

JF - Journal of Organizational Behavior

SN - 0894-3796

IS - 6

ER -