Emotionally and cognitively informed consent for clinical care for differences of sex development

Anne Tamar-Mattis, Arlene Baratz, Katharine Baratz Dalke, Katrina Karkazis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Clinicians who utilise recommended best practices for informed consent may be surprised that families in support groups frequently report that some physicians continue to recommend certain irreversible treatments for children with differences of sex development (DSD) without adequate psychosocial support for cognitive processing of information necessary to decision-making. Such practice is contrary to recommendations in the 2006 Consensus Statement on Management of Intersex Disorders. When psychological preparation is lacking for aspects of DSD such as uncertainty about future gender identity, a false sense of urgency can propel parents to agree to genital surgery or removal of gonads without adequate understanding of the long-term consequences in adulthood. If physicians are uncomfortable discussing gender and sexual issues, they may not explore the feasibility of, or offer support for, alternative approaches towards sex atypicality. Families may draw unrealistic conclusions regarding the extent to which such interventions will relieve their distress and improve quality of life for the child and family. Failing to offer adequate psychosocial support to parents making irreversible decisions about DSD can raise significant ethical and legal concerns. Families may experience regret and anger when they make decisions on the basis of limited or even biased information while in an emotionally vulnerable state. Children's autonomy is violated when they are completely excluded from decision-making. We propose adoption of a holistic approach to emotionally and cognitively informed consent in this setting, with inclusion of psychosocial and peer support from the earliest stages.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)44-55
Number of pages12
JournalPsychology and Sexuality
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Sexual Development
Informed Consent
psychosocial care
Decision Making
decision making
parents
Parents
physician
Physicians
Self-Help Groups
gender
holistic approach
Anger
Gonads
Interpersonal Relations
Automatic Data Processing
Practice Guidelines
anger
adulthood
surgery

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Gender Studies
  • Social Psychology
  • Health(social science)
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Tamar-Mattis, Anne ; Baratz, Arlene ; Baratz Dalke, Katharine ; Karkazis, Katrina. / Emotionally and cognitively informed consent for clinical care for differences of sex development. In: Psychology and Sexuality. 2014 ; Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 44-55.
@article{e0a31ce90d5e4ea1b2cbc68a0459a6f3,
title = "Emotionally and cognitively informed consent for clinical care for differences of sex development",
abstract = "Clinicians who utilise recommended best practices for informed consent may be surprised that families in support groups frequently report that some physicians continue to recommend certain irreversible treatments for children with differences of sex development (DSD) without adequate psychosocial support for cognitive processing of information necessary to decision-making. Such practice is contrary to recommendations in the 2006 Consensus Statement on Management of Intersex Disorders. When psychological preparation is lacking for aspects of DSD such as uncertainty about future gender identity, a false sense of urgency can propel parents to agree to genital surgery or removal of gonads without adequate understanding of the long-term consequences in adulthood. If physicians are uncomfortable discussing gender and sexual issues, they may not explore the feasibility of, or offer support for, alternative approaches towards sex atypicality. Families may draw unrealistic conclusions regarding the extent to which such interventions will relieve their distress and improve quality of life for the child and family. Failing to offer adequate psychosocial support to parents making irreversible decisions about DSD can raise significant ethical and legal concerns. Families may experience regret and anger when they make decisions on the basis of limited or even biased information while in an emotionally vulnerable state. Children's autonomy is violated when they are completely excluded from decision-making. We propose adoption of a holistic approach to emotionally and cognitively informed consent in this setting, with inclusion of psychosocial and peer support from the earliest stages.",
author = "Anne Tamar-Mattis and Arlene Baratz and {Baratz Dalke}, Katharine and Katrina Karkazis",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/19419899.2013.831215",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "44--55",
journal = "Psychology and Sexuality",
issn = "1941-9899",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Emotionally and cognitively informed consent for clinical care for differences of sex development. / Tamar-Mattis, Anne; Baratz, Arlene; Baratz Dalke, Katharine; Karkazis, Katrina.

In: Psychology and Sexuality, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 44-55.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emotionally and cognitively informed consent for clinical care for differences of sex development

AU - Tamar-Mattis, Anne

AU - Baratz, Arlene

AU - Baratz Dalke, Katharine

AU - Karkazis, Katrina

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Clinicians who utilise recommended best practices for informed consent may be surprised that families in support groups frequently report that some physicians continue to recommend certain irreversible treatments for children with differences of sex development (DSD) without adequate psychosocial support for cognitive processing of information necessary to decision-making. Such practice is contrary to recommendations in the 2006 Consensus Statement on Management of Intersex Disorders. When psychological preparation is lacking for aspects of DSD such as uncertainty about future gender identity, a false sense of urgency can propel parents to agree to genital surgery or removal of gonads without adequate understanding of the long-term consequences in adulthood. If physicians are uncomfortable discussing gender and sexual issues, they may not explore the feasibility of, or offer support for, alternative approaches towards sex atypicality. Families may draw unrealistic conclusions regarding the extent to which such interventions will relieve their distress and improve quality of life for the child and family. Failing to offer adequate psychosocial support to parents making irreversible decisions about DSD can raise significant ethical and legal concerns. Families may experience regret and anger when they make decisions on the basis of limited or even biased information while in an emotionally vulnerable state. Children's autonomy is violated when they are completely excluded from decision-making. We propose adoption of a holistic approach to emotionally and cognitively informed consent in this setting, with inclusion of psychosocial and peer support from the earliest stages.

AB - Clinicians who utilise recommended best practices for informed consent may be surprised that families in support groups frequently report that some physicians continue to recommend certain irreversible treatments for children with differences of sex development (DSD) without adequate psychosocial support for cognitive processing of information necessary to decision-making. Such practice is contrary to recommendations in the 2006 Consensus Statement on Management of Intersex Disorders. When psychological preparation is lacking for aspects of DSD such as uncertainty about future gender identity, a false sense of urgency can propel parents to agree to genital surgery or removal of gonads without adequate understanding of the long-term consequences in adulthood. If physicians are uncomfortable discussing gender and sexual issues, they may not explore the feasibility of, or offer support for, alternative approaches towards sex atypicality. Families may draw unrealistic conclusions regarding the extent to which such interventions will relieve their distress and improve quality of life for the child and family. Failing to offer adequate psychosocial support to parents making irreversible decisions about DSD can raise significant ethical and legal concerns. Families may experience regret and anger when they make decisions on the basis of limited or even biased information while in an emotionally vulnerable state. Children's autonomy is violated when they are completely excluded from decision-making. We propose adoption of a holistic approach to emotionally and cognitively informed consent in this setting, with inclusion of psychosocial and peer support from the earliest stages.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84895907037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84895907037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19419899.2013.831215

DO - 10.1080/19419899.2013.831215

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84895907037

VL - 5

SP - 44

EP - 55

JO - Psychology and Sexuality

JF - Psychology and Sexuality

SN - 1941-9899

IS - 1

ER -