Employment adequacy in extractive industries: An analysis of underemployment, 1974–1998

Tim Slack, Leif Jensen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Marginal employment stands as a major obstacle to the economic health of American families and communities. This is particularly true among those who work in extractive industries. We conceptualize marginal employment as underemployment, which goes beyond unemployment to include discouraged workers, involuntary part-time workers, and the working poor. Analyzing data from the March Current Population Survey from 1974 through 1998, we find that workers in extractive industries face far higher rates of underemployment than do those employed in other major industrial sectors. However, this aggregation masks great intracategory heterogeneity. The high rates of underemployment observed in extractive industries are largely a driven by the disadvantages of those employed in agriculture and forestry/fishing. In contrast, those employed in mining enjoy substantially lower rates of underemployment. The relative employment circumstances found in each industry are only partly explained by conventional predictors of underemployment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)129-146
Number of pages18
JournalSociety and Natural Resources
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2004

Fingerprint

underemployment
industry
unemployment
part-time worker
forestry
fishing
worker
agriculture
aggregation
economics
rate
analysis
extractive industry
health
community

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Development
  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{fd94e48043c4477da864e5587a0b96fe,
title = "Employment adequacy in extractive industries: An analysis of underemployment, 1974–1998",
abstract = "Marginal employment stands as a major obstacle to the economic health of American families and communities. This is particularly true among those who work in extractive industries. We conceptualize marginal employment as underemployment, which goes beyond unemployment to include discouraged workers, involuntary part-time workers, and the working poor. Analyzing data from the March Current Population Survey from 1974 through 1998, we find that workers in extractive industries face far higher rates of underemployment than do those employed in other major industrial sectors. However, this aggregation masks great intracategory heterogeneity. The high rates of underemployment observed in extractive industries are largely a driven by the disadvantages of those employed in agriculture and forestry/fishing. In contrast, those employed in mining enjoy substantially lower rates of underemployment. The relative employment circumstances found in each industry are only partly explained by conventional predictors of underemployment.",
author = "Tim Slack and Leif Jensen",
year = "2004",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/08941920490261258",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "129--146",
journal = "Society and Natural Resources",
issn = "0894-1920",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Employment adequacy in extractive industries : An analysis of underemployment, 1974–1998. / Slack, Tim; Jensen, Leif.

In: Society and Natural Resources, Vol. 17, No. 2, 01.02.2004, p. 129-146.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Employment adequacy in extractive industries

T2 - An analysis of underemployment, 1974–1998

AU - Slack, Tim

AU - Jensen, Leif

PY - 2004/2/1

Y1 - 2004/2/1

N2 - Marginal employment stands as a major obstacle to the economic health of American families and communities. This is particularly true among those who work in extractive industries. We conceptualize marginal employment as underemployment, which goes beyond unemployment to include discouraged workers, involuntary part-time workers, and the working poor. Analyzing data from the March Current Population Survey from 1974 through 1998, we find that workers in extractive industries face far higher rates of underemployment than do those employed in other major industrial sectors. However, this aggregation masks great intracategory heterogeneity. The high rates of underemployment observed in extractive industries are largely a driven by the disadvantages of those employed in agriculture and forestry/fishing. In contrast, those employed in mining enjoy substantially lower rates of underemployment. The relative employment circumstances found in each industry are only partly explained by conventional predictors of underemployment.

AB - Marginal employment stands as a major obstacle to the economic health of American families and communities. This is particularly true among those who work in extractive industries. We conceptualize marginal employment as underemployment, which goes beyond unemployment to include discouraged workers, involuntary part-time workers, and the working poor. Analyzing data from the March Current Population Survey from 1974 through 1998, we find that workers in extractive industries face far higher rates of underemployment than do those employed in other major industrial sectors. However, this aggregation masks great intracategory heterogeneity. The high rates of underemployment observed in extractive industries are largely a driven by the disadvantages of those employed in agriculture and forestry/fishing. In contrast, those employed in mining enjoy substantially lower rates of underemployment. The relative employment circumstances found in each industry are only partly explained by conventional predictors of underemployment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1342290336&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1342290336&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08941920490261258

DO - 10.1080/08941920490261258

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:1342290336

VL - 17

SP - 129

EP - 146

JO - Society and Natural Resources

JF - Society and Natural Resources

SN - 0894-1920

IS - 2

ER -