Energy efficiency in small and medium-sized manufacturing firms: Order effects and the adoption of process improvement recommendations

Suresh Muthulingam, Charles J. Corbett, Shlomo Benartzi, Bohdan Oppenheim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In many manufacturing operations, profitable energy efficiency opportunities remain unexploited. Although previous studies have tried to explain the underinvestment, we focus on how the way in which a portfolio of opportunities is presented in a list affects adoption decisions. We use information on over 100,000 energy-saving recommendations made to more than 13,000 small and medium-sized manufacturing firms under the Industrial Assessment Centers program of the U.S. Department of Energy. We find that adoption rates are higher for initiatives appearing early in a list of recommendations. This sequence effect is consistent and large: simply moving a recommendation one position lower has the same effect on average as increasing up-front implementation cost by at least 17% from the average value. Given this impact of sequence on adoption of individual recommendations, we utilize variations within our data to examine how various sequencing approaches affect adoption at the portfolio level. Sequences in which recommendations are listed from best to worst payback achieve higher potential energy savings given the investments in energy efficiency made by the firms. We also observe a choice overload effect at the portfolio level, but the magnitude of this effect is small.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)596-615
Number of pages20
JournalManufacturing and Service Operations Management
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2013

Fingerprint

Process improvement
Order effects
Energy efficiency
Manufacturing firms
Energy saving
Manufacturing
Overload
Costs
Payback
Energy
Underinvestment
Sequencing
Assessment center
Information use

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Cite this

@article{42ef42409fe5453cbdb4be443efc9125,
title = "Energy efficiency in small and medium-sized manufacturing firms: Order effects and the adoption of process improvement recommendations",
abstract = "In many manufacturing operations, profitable energy efficiency opportunities remain unexploited. Although previous studies have tried to explain the underinvestment, we focus on how the way in which a portfolio of opportunities is presented in a list affects adoption decisions. We use information on over 100,000 energy-saving recommendations made to more than 13,000 small and medium-sized manufacturing firms under the Industrial Assessment Centers program of the U.S. Department of Energy. We find that adoption rates are higher for initiatives appearing early in a list of recommendations. This sequence effect is consistent and large: simply moving a recommendation one position lower has the same effect on average as increasing up-front implementation cost by at least 17{\%} from the average value. Given this impact of sequence on adoption of individual recommendations, we utilize variations within our data to examine how various sequencing approaches affect adoption at the portfolio level. Sequences in which recommendations are listed from best to worst payback achieve higher potential energy savings given the investments in energy efficiency made by the firms. We also observe a choice overload effect at the portfolio level, but the magnitude of this effect is small.",
author = "Suresh Muthulingam and Corbett, {Charles J.} and Shlomo Benartzi and Bohdan Oppenheim",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1287/msom.2013.0439",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "596--615",
journal = "Manufacturing and Service Operations Management",
issn = "1523-4614",
publisher = "INFORMS Inst.for Operations Res.and the Management Sciences",
number = "4",

}

Energy efficiency in small and medium-sized manufacturing firms : Order effects and the adoption of process improvement recommendations. / Muthulingam, Suresh; Corbett, Charles J.; Benartzi, Shlomo; Oppenheim, Bohdan.

In: Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, Vol. 15, No. 4, 01.09.2013, p. 596-615.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Energy efficiency in small and medium-sized manufacturing firms

T2 - Order effects and the adoption of process improvement recommendations

AU - Muthulingam, Suresh

AU - Corbett, Charles J.

AU - Benartzi, Shlomo

AU - Oppenheim, Bohdan

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - In many manufacturing operations, profitable energy efficiency opportunities remain unexploited. Although previous studies have tried to explain the underinvestment, we focus on how the way in which a portfolio of opportunities is presented in a list affects adoption decisions. We use information on over 100,000 energy-saving recommendations made to more than 13,000 small and medium-sized manufacturing firms under the Industrial Assessment Centers program of the U.S. Department of Energy. We find that adoption rates are higher for initiatives appearing early in a list of recommendations. This sequence effect is consistent and large: simply moving a recommendation one position lower has the same effect on average as increasing up-front implementation cost by at least 17% from the average value. Given this impact of sequence on adoption of individual recommendations, we utilize variations within our data to examine how various sequencing approaches affect adoption at the portfolio level. Sequences in which recommendations are listed from best to worst payback achieve higher potential energy savings given the investments in energy efficiency made by the firms. We also observe a choice overload effect at the portfolio level, but the magnitude of this effect is small.

AB - In many manufacturing operations, profitable energy efficiency opportunities remain unexploited. Although previous studies have tried to explain the underinvestment, we focus on how the way in which a portfolio of opportunities is presented in a list affects adoption decisions. We use information on over 100,000 energy-saving recommendations made to more than 13,000 small and medium-sized manufacturing firms under the Industrial Assessment Centers program of the U.S. Department of Energy. We find that adoption rates are higher for initiatives appearing early in a list of recommendations. This sequence effect is consistent and large: simply moving a recommendation one position lower has the same effect on average as increasing up-front implementation cost by at least 17% from the average value. Given this impact of sequence on adoption of individual recommendations, we utilize variations within our data to examine how various sequencing approaches affect adoption at the portfolio level. Sequences in which recommendations are listed from best to worst payback achieve higher potential energy savings given the investments in energy efficiency made by the firms. We also observe a choice overload effect at the portfolio level, but the magnitude of this effect is small.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886021990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886021990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1287/msom.2013.0439

DO - 10.1287/msom.2013.0439

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84886021990

VL - 15

SP - 596

EP - 615

JO - Manufacturing and Service Operations Management

JF - Manufacturing and Service Operations Management

SN - 1523-4614

IS - 4

ER -