Energy re-investment

Hari M. Osofsky, Jacqueline Peel, Brett H. McDonnell, Anita Foerster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Despite worsening climate change threats, investment in energy - in the United States and globally - is dominated by fossil fuels. This Article provides a novel analysis of two pathways in corporate and securities law that together have the potential to shift patterns of energy investment. The first pathway targets current investments and corporate decision-making. It includes efforts to influence investors to divest from owning shares in fossil fuel companies and to influence companies to address climate change risks in their internal decision-making processes. This pathway has received increasing attention, especially in light of the Paris Agreement and the Trump Administration's decision to withdraw from it. But, alone, it will not be enough to foster transition to a cleaner mix of energy sources. Key to achieving this goal of energy reinvestment is a second pathway focused on fostering investments in new companies innovating in clean energy. This pathway - which has received far less attention - uses emerging legal mechanisms to support greater investment in entrepreneurial clean energy ventures. The Article's analysis of this pathway looks beyond the well-established ways in which subsidies support fossil fuels and renewable energy. It instead examines the significance for energy reinvestment of changes in U.S. securities regulation permitting greater crowdsourcing of investment and in state laws allowing for new types of corporations. This Article is the first to examine how these two pathways can synergistically promote energy reinvestment. The first pathway moves money away from fossil fuels, while the second helps to spur needed reinvestment. The Article proposes strategies for deploying the tools in the two pathways together, taking into account the motivations and constraints of diverse investors and corporations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)595-652
Number of pages58
JournalIndiana Law Journal
Volume94
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

reinvestment
energy
investor
corporation
climate change
energy source
state law
renewable energy
subsidy
decision-making process
money
threat
decision making
regulation
Law

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Law

Cite this

Osofsky, H. M., Peel, J., McDonnell, B. H., & Foerster, A. (2019). Energy re-investment. Indiana Law Journal, 94(2), 595-652.
Osofsky, Hari M. ; Peel, Jacqueline ; McDonnell, Brett H. ; Foerster, Anita. / Energy re-investment. In: Indiana Law Journal. 2019 ; Vol. 94, No. 2. pp. 595-652.
@article{94ef8f83d15148989a03786bf0608ba5,
title = "Energy re-investment",
abstract = "Despite worsening climate change threats, investment in energy - in the United States and globally - is dominated by fossil fuels. This Article provides a novel analysis of two pathways in corporate and securities law that together have the potential to shift patterns of energy investment. The first pathway targets current investments and corporate decision-making. It includes efforts to influence investors to divest from owning shares in fossil fuel companies and to influence companies to address climate change risks in their internal decision-making processes. This pathway has received increasing attention, especially in light of the Paris Agreement and the Trump Administration's decision to withdraw from it. But, alone, it will not be enough to foster transition to a cleaner mix of energy sources. Key to achieving this goal of energy reinvestment is a second pathway focused on fostering investments in new companies innovating in clean energy. This pathway - which has received far less attention - uses emerging legal mechanisms to support greater investment in entrepreneurial clean energy ventures. The Article's analysis of this pathway looks beyond the well-established ways in which subsidies support fossil fuels and renewable energy. It instead examines the significance for energy reinvestment of changes in U.S. securities regulation permitting greater crowdsourcing of investment and in state laws allowing for new types of corporations. This Article is the first to examine how these two pathways can synergistically promote energy reinvestment. The first pathway moves money away from fossil fuels, while the second helps to spur needed reinvestment. The Article proposes strategies for deploying the tools in the two pathways together, taking into account the motivations and constraints of diverse investors and corporations.",
author = "Osofsky, {Hari M.} and Jacqueline Peel and McDonnell, {Brett H.} and Anita Foerster",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "94",
pages = "595--652",
journal = "Indiana Law Journal",
issn = "0019-6665",
publisher = "Indiana University",
number = "2",

}

Osofsky, HM, Peel, J, McDonnell, BH & Foerster, A 2019, 'Energy re-investment', Indiana Law Journal, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 595-652.

Energy re-investment. / Osofsky, Hari M.; Peel, Jacqueline; McDonnell, Brett H.; Foerster, Anita.

In: Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 94, No. 2, 01.01.2019, p. 595-652.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Energy re-investment

AU - Osofsky, Hari M.

AU - Peel, Jacqueline

AU - McDonnell, Brett H.

AU - Foerster, Anita

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Despite worsening climate change threats, investment in energy - in the United States and globally - is dominated by fossil fuels. This Article provides a novel analysis of two pathways in corporate and securities law that together have the potential to shift patterns of energy investment. The first pathway targets current investments and corporate decision-making. It includes efforts to influence investors to divest from owning shares in fossil fuel companies and to influence companies to address climate change risks in their internal decision-making processes. This pathway has received increasing attention, especially in light of the Paris Agreement and the Trump Administration's decision to withdraw from it. But, alone, it will not be enough to foster transition to a cleaner mix of energy sources. Key to achieving this goal of energy reinvestment is a second pathway focused on fostering investments in new companies innovating in clean energy. This pathway - which has received far less attention - uses emerging legal mechanisms to support greater investment in entrepreneurial clean energy ventures. The Article's analysis of this pathway looks beyond the well-established ways in which subsidies support fossil fuels and renewable energy. It instead examines the significance for energy reinvestment of changes in U.S. securities regulation permitting greater crowdsourcing of investment and in state laws allowing for new types of corporations. This Article is the first to examine how these two pathways can synergistically promote energy reinvestment. The first pathway moves money away from fossil fuels, while the second helps to spur needed reinvestment. The Article proposes strategies for deploying the tools in the two pathways together, taking into account the motivations and constraints of diverse investors and corporations.

AB - Despite worsening climate change threats, investment in energy - in the United States and globally - is dominated by fossil fuels. This Article provides a novel analysis of two pathways in corporate and securities law that together have the potential to shift patterns of energy investment. The first pathway targets current investments and corporate decision-making. It includes efforts to influence investors to divest from owning shares in fossil fuel companies and to influence companies to address climate change risks in their internal decision-making processes. This pathway has received increasing attention, especially in light of the Paris Agreement and the Trump Administration's decision to withdraw from it. But, alone, it will not be enough to foster transition to a cleaner mix of energy sources. Key to achieving this goal of energy reinvestment is a second pathway focused on fostering investments in new companies innovating in clean energy. This pathway - which has received far less attention - uses emerging legal mechanisms to support greater investment in entrepreneurial clean energy ventures. The Article's analysis of this pathway looks beyond the well-established ways in which subsidies support fossil fuels and renewable energy. It instead examines the significance for energy reinvestment of changes in U.S. securities regulation permitting greater crowdsourcing of investment and in state laws allowing for new types of corporations. This Article is the first to examine how these two pathways can synergistically promote energy reinvestment. The first pathway moves money away from fossil fuels, while the second helps to spur needed reinvestment. The Article proposes strategies for deploying the tools in the two pathways together, taking into account the motivations and constraints of diverse investors and corporations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069046773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069046773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85069046773

VL - 94

SP - 595

EP - 652

JO - Indiana Law Journal

JF - Indiana Law Journal

SN - 0019-6665

IS - 2

ER -

Osofsky HM, Peel J, McDonnell BH, Foerster A. Energy re-investment. Indiana Law Journal. 2019 Jan 1;94(2):595-652.