Energy storage systems in energy and ancillary markets: A backwards induction approach

Joohyun Cho, Andrew Nathan Kleit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Battery storage technologies have developed to the point that some are mature enough to serve as a generation resource. However, whether a battery can generate profits by interacting solely in energy markets is unclear. Meanwhile, FERC order 784 requires electricity exchange markets in the U.S. to install the necessary technical equipment for batteries to supply ancillary services [12]. We suggest that current economic studies on the battery energy storage system (ESS) are limited because they do not explore possibilities to use battery storage in ancillary (reserve) markets. Applying battery ESS to ancillary service could be profitable enough to cover investment costs.In this study, we consider a battery storage operator's best strategy each day, using backwards induction. We analyze the storage device as an exhaustible resource with a limited number of charging cycles and operating years. Based on this approach, we build a revenue model to maximized the net present value of the battery energy storage system revenues by applying the three-staged-method employed by Shcherbakova et al. [14]. We found that the battery in unable to cover its costs, and it does not use all the cycles available in its lifetime. This result, however, may be a function of the limits of our analytical approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)176-183
Number of pages8
JournalApplied Energy
Volume147
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

Energy storage
market
energy
Costs
Profitability
Electricity
Economics
battery
energy storage
energy market
resource
cost
electricity
economics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Building and Construction
  • Energy(all)
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

@article{99c33de8f1a54b7889f76960c72164a6,
title = "Energy storage systems in energy and ancillary markets: A backwards induction approach",
abstract = "Battery storage technologies have developed to the point that some are mature enough to serve as a generation resource. However, whether a battery can generate profits by interacting solely in energy markets is unclear. Meanwhile, FERC order 784 requires electricity exchange markets in the U.S. to install the necessary technical equipment for batteries to supply ancillary services [12]. We suggest that current economic studies on the battery energy storage system (ESS) are limited because they do not explore possibilities to use battery storage in ancillary (reserve) markets. Applying battery ESS to ancillary service could be profitable enough to cover investment costs.In this study, we consider a battery storage operator's best strategy each day, using backwards induction. We analyze the storage device as an exhaustible resource with a limited number of charging cycles and operating years. Based on this approach, we build a revenue model to maximized the net present value of the battery energy storage system revenues by applying the three-staged-method employed by Shcherbakova et al. [14]. We found that the battery in unable to cover its costs, and it does not use all the cycles available in its lifetime. This result, however, may be a function of the limits of our analytical approach.",
author = "Joohyun Cho and Kleit, {Andrew Nathan}",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.114",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "147",
pages = "176--183",
journal = "Applied Energy",
issn = "0306-2619",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Energy storage systems in energy and ancillary markets : A backwards induction approach. / Cho, Joohyun; Kleit, Andrew Nathan.

In: Applied Energy, Vol. 147, 01.06.2015, p. 176-183.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Energy storage systems in energy and ancillary markets

T2 - A backwards induction approach

AU - Cho, Joohyun

AU - Kleit, Andrew Nathan

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Battery storage technologies have developed to the point that some are mature enough to serve as a generation resource. However, whether a battery can generate profits by interacting solely in energy markets is unclear. Meanwhile, FERC order 784 requires electricity exchange markets in the U.S. to install the necessary technical equipment for batteries to supply ancillary services [12]. We suggest that current economic studies on the battery energy storage system (ESS) are limited because they do not explore possibilities to use battery storage in ancillary (reserve) markets. Applying battery ESS to ancillary service could be profitable enough to cover investment costs.In this study, we consider a battery storage operator's best strategy each day, using backwards induction. We analyze the storage device as an exhaustible resource with a limited number of charging cycles and operating years. Based on this approach, we build a revenue model to maximized the net present value of the battery energy storage system revenues by applying the three-staged-method employed by Shcherbakova et al. [14]. We found that the battery in unable to cover its costs, and it does not use all the cycles available in its lifetime. This result, however, may be a function of the limits of our analytical approach.

AB - Battery storage technologies have developed to the point that some are mature enough to serve as a generation resource. However, whether a battery can generate profits by interacting solely in energy markets is unclear. Meanwhile, FERC order 784 requires electricity exchange markets in the U.S. to install the necessary technical equipment for batteries to supply ancillary services [12]. We suggest that current economic studies on the battery energy storage system (ESS) are limited because they do not explore possibilities to use battery storage in ancillary (reserve) markets. Applying battery ESS to ancillary service could be profitable enough to cover investment costs.In this study, we consider a battery storage operator's best strategy each day, using backwards induction. We analyze the storage device as an exhaustible resource with a limited number of charging cycles and operating years. Based on this approach, we build a revenue model to maximized the net present value of the battery energy storage system revenues by applying the three-staged-method employed by Shcherbakova et al. [14]. We found that the battery in unable to cover its costs, and it does not use all the cycles available in its lifetime. This result, however, may be a function of the limits of our analytical approach.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924663880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924663880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.114

DO - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.114

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84924663880

VL - 147

SP - 176

EP - 183

JO - Applied Energy

JF - Applied Energy

SN - 0306-2619

ER -